Be very afraid

loosecannon

Senior Member
May 7, 2007
4,888
269
48
Following the publication of my article titled “Gate Rape of America,” I was contacted by a source within the DHS who is troubled by the terminology and content of an internal memo reportedly issued yesterday at the hand of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. Indeed, both the terminology and content contained in the document are troubling. The dissemination of the document itself is restricted by virtue of its classification, which prohibits any manner of public release. While the document cannot be posted or published, the more salient points are revealed here.

The memo, which actually takes the form of an administrative directive, appears to be the product of undated but recent high level meetings between Napolitano, John Pistole, head of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA),and one or more of Obama’s national security advisors. This document officially addresses those who are opposed to, or engaged in the disruption of the implementation of the enhanced airport screening procedures as “domestic extremists.”

The introductory paragraph of the multi-page document states that it is issued “in response to the growing public backlash against enhanced TSA security screening procedures and the agents conducting the screening process.” Implicit within the same section is that the recently enhanced security screening procedures implemented at U.S. airports, and the measures to be taken in response to the negative public backlash as detailed [in this directive], have the full support of the President. In other words, Obama not only endorses the enhanced security screening, but the measures outlined in this directive to be taken in response to public objections.

The terminology contained within the reported memo is indeed troubling. It labels any person who “interferes” with TSA airport security screening procedure protocol and operations by actively objecting to the established screening process, “including but not limited to the anticipated national opt-out day” as a “domestic extremist.” The label is then broadened to include “any person, group or alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel disruptions at U.S. airports in response to the enhanced security procedures.

For individuals who engaged in such activity at screening points, it instructs TSA operations to obtain the identities of those individuals and other applicable information and submit the same electronically to the Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division, the Extremism and Radicalization branch of the Office of Intelligence & Analysis (IA) division of the Department of Homeland Security.

For “any person, group or domestic alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel “disruptions” at U.S. airports (as defined above) in response to the enhanced security procedures, the [applicable DHS administrative branch] is instructed to identify and collect information about the persons or entities, and submit such information in the manner outlined [within this directive].


It would appear that the Department of Homeland Security is not only prepared to enforce the enhanced security procedures at airports, but is involved in gathering intelligence about those who don’t. They’re making a list and most certainly will be checking it twice. Meanwhile, legitimate threats to our air travel security (and they DO exist) seem to be taking a back seat to the larger threat of the multitude of non-criminal American citizens who object to having their Constitutional rights violated.

DHS & TSA: Making a list, checking it twice
 
If this is true then those involved should be tried for treason and executed. But we need to see that memo or all bets are off.
 
In other words, Obama not only endorses the enhanced security screening, but the measures outlined in this directive to be taken in response to public objections.

The terminology contained within the reported memo is indeed troubling. It labels any person who “interferes” with TSA airport security screening procedure protocol and operations by actively objecting to the established screening process, “including but not limited to the anticipated national opt-out day” as a “domestic extremist.” The label is then broadened to include “any person, group or alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel disruptions at U.S. airports in response to the enhanced security procedures.

DHS & TSA: Making a list, checking it twice

Sort of Reminds me affectionately of Alexander Hamilton and the "Alien" and "Sedition" Acts.

Some pretty fucked up shit huh. I wonder if Obama hears Evil Conservatives under his bed and in his closet too. The man has thrown so many people under the bus, it has made him paranoid, afraid of his own shadow.
 
The Left has no problem executing revolutionaries.
I dont know whether the memo is true or not. Time will tell. But this is the same administration that classed returning war vets as possible domestic terrorists.
 
Without the memo, this story has no credibility, just saying. I could call a reporter at the canadian free press, a hardly prestigious group, and claim to be a TSA with a secret memo.

Then again I wouldn't put it past big sis since I too was on her list because of my bumper sticker identified me as a potential "terrorist". I was actually quizzed by the police because of a bumper sticker.

If this story is true then I'll proudly wear the badge of "domestic terrorist".
 
The Left has no problem executing revolutionaries.
I dont know whether the memo is true or not. Time will tell. But this is the same administration that classed returning war vets as possible domestic terrorists.

That was the same fusion center memo that had me detained over my bumper sticker although that was not the cause for the stop.
 
Without the memo, this story has no credibility, just saying. I could call a reporter at the canadian free press, a hardly prestigious group, and claim to be a TSA with a secret memo.

Then again I wouldn't put it past big sis since I too was on her list because of my bumper sticker identified me as a potential "terrorist". I was actually quizzed by the police because of a bumper sticker.

If this story is true then I'll proudly wear the badge of "domestic terrorist".

If combat vets are "domestic terrorists" then count me in. And, I'd bet my bottom nickel that the overwhelming majority of vets would be glad to be included.

I don't believe in "absolutes"..... so the very few CRAZED, I repeat CRAZED Obamarrhoidal LIEbturd vets, who lost their minds, refuse that honour......then let them bask in the love of Incompetano. Who knows.....she might even service them. Belay that.....who'd want that ?
 
Last edited:
Without the memo, this story has no credibility, just saying. I could call a reporter at the canadian free press, a hardly prestigious group, and claim to be a TSA with a secret memo.

Then again I wouldn't put it past big sis since I too was on her list because of my bumper sticker identified me as a potential "terrorist". I was actually quizzed by the police because of a bumper sticker.

If this story is true then I'll proudly wear the badge of "domestic terrorist".

If combat vets are "domestic terrorists" then count me in. And, I'd bet my bottom nickel that the overwhelming majority of vets would be glad to be included.

I don't believe in "absolutes"..... so the very few CRAZED, I repeat CRAZED Obamarrhoidal LIEbturd vets, who lost their minds refuse that honour......then let them bask in the love of Incompetano. Who knows.....she might even service them. Belay that.....who'd want that ?


That's the spirit.
 
its always striking to see and read somehting like this, let me say right off i am suspicious........Ito will wait and see...but I think its worth noting that though reps are always ballyhooed as the great oppressors it was Wilson who caged over 10,000 German here in America, enforced sedition acts, that today would have the aclu in full apoplexy FDR concentrated over 100,000 Japanese, RFK bugged MLK.......Wilson put us in WW1, fdr ww2, with help from the japs yes, but hey, why equivocate now, many on the left don't when it comes to afghan., the the Korean war, Vietnam.....banana wars up the wazoo, Reagan did Grenada big whoop, bush 1 panama, W afghan and iraq......shall we do a body count?
 

Forum List

Back
Top