G ginscpy Senior Member Sep 10, 2010 7,950 232 48 Nov 10, 2010 #1 Korea was sort of borderline -between WW2 and Vietnam. Korea was a tweener. Vietnam had some battles -but no campaigns. Irag and afg have neither not wars
Korea was sort of borderline -between WW2 and Vietnam. Korea was a tweener. Vietnam had some battles -but no campaigns. Irag and afg have neither not wars
RetiredGySgt Diamond Member May 6, 2007 56,563 18,587 2,260 North Carolina Nov 10, 2010 #2 Vietnam had several Campaigns, they generally last no more then 1 or 2 months. And the Tet offensive created several campaigns as well. Iraq was one campaign for the whole war. Don't know a lot about Afghanistan but seems to me they had several operations over a large area for a month or so. That would be a campaign.
Vietnam had several Campaigns, they generally last no more then 1 or 2 months. And the Tet offensive created several campaigns as well. Iraq was one campaign for the whole war. Don't know a lot about Afghanistan but seems to me they had several operations over a large area for a month or so. That would be a campaign.
G ginscpy Senior Member Sep 10, 2010 7,950 232 48 Nov 10, 2010 Thread starter #3 Who won the Tet "Offensive??" Not the cong. Recall Saigon police chief executing a cong Unmitigated disaster for the North Vietnamese Traitor media ie Walter Cronkite and anti-war punks made TET out to be a defeat for the US FDR stifled all dissent from the effort in WW2. Threatened to exile them - put them on an island. if thats what it takes.............. Last edited: Nov 10, 2010
Who won the Tet "Offensive??" Not the cong. Recall Saigon police chief executing a cong Unmitigated disaster for the North Vietnamese Traitor media ie Walter Cronkite and anti-war punks made TET out to be a defeat for the US FDR stifled all dissent from the effort in WW2. Threatened to exile them - put them on an island. if thats what it takes..............
editec Mr. Forgot-it-All Jun 5, 2008 41,421 5,672 48 Maine Nov 10, 2010 #4 The nature of war is changing. Technology is, in part, the reason. Plus the USA hasn't really faced a large army since its brief encounter with the Iraqi Army, and they were so outclassed that no WWII type conditions arose that would have created long campaigns.
The nature of war is changing. Technology is, in part, the reason. Plus the USA hasn't really faced a large army since its brief encounter with the Iraqi Army, and they were so outclassed that no WWII type conditions arose that would have created long campaigns.