Barnry Frank Blames SEC Porn Scandal on GOP

It's so interesting how the rightwingnuts can take something true, and use it to advance their own hate and homophobia.

And they wonder why moderates can't vote for them? Their lunacy always shows.

:cuckoo:


what wads actually said, despite the mischaracterization of the rightwingnuts who didn't get past the title given to the comments, the culture of the SEC during the bush admin was do nothing... do not regulate.

ended up people had nothing to do. and it was so bad that what they DID do was download porn. instead of responding to that, it's made into a homophobic rant because you can't justify what your losers did.
 
Last edited:
There are people on the planet who serve no purpose to man or beast. Franks is one of them. I kinda look forward to participating in the thread announcing his demise.
 

ROFLMNAO!

Poor Bawney... This is the same species of reasoning which Bawney uses to dissemble from his responsibility in the Mortgage meltdown, across the board.

Remember, kids... this is a person who lacks the moral clarity to recognize that as a biological outee... that his sexual responsibility is to focus his attentions to biological inees.

This is just one more example of why homosexuals have no business being allowed to assume any position of th public trust; they simply do not possess the means to recognize sound reasoning. A tendency which is the minimal standard for admission into the ideological Left; deceit, fraud... it's the nature of evil.
 
Barney is one extremely disgusting human being. He does need to leave Washington.

Just seeing him invokes the gag reflex. I am not sure if it's drool or something else oozing when he speaks.
 

Sad, but true comment from the link:

I'm sorry, but wasn't it Bawney Fwank who said Freddie and Fannie were perfectly sound and there was no reason to be concerned about their solvency back in 2008 right before everything collapsed? And BTW, who was running the legislative branch of the government in 2007 and 2008? Oh yeah, Bawney's party.
Only CON$ can blame people, even if they have to make crap up to do so.

It was Sept 2003 not 2008 and the GOP ran everything at the time. AFTER Frank spoke, the GOP in Dec 2003 changed the rules letting people with bad credit and who could not afford the payments get no down payment loans for more than the value of the house. It was called the American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI).
Bush owns the housing crash.

American Dream Downpayment Initiative - Affordable Housing - CPD - HUD
American Dream Downpayment Initiative
Summary

The American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI) was signed into law on December 16, 2003. The American Dream Downpayment Assistance Act authorizes up to $200 million annually for fiscal years 2004 - 2007. ADDI will provide funds to all fifty states and to local participating jurisdictions that have a population of at least 150,000 or will receive an allocation of at least $50,000 under the ADDI formula. ADDI will be administered as a part of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, a formula grant program.

Purpose

ADDI aims to increase the homeownership rate, especially among lower income and minority households, and to revitalize and stabilize communities. ADDI will help first-time homebuyers with the biggest hurdle to homeownership: downpayment and closing costs. The program was created to assist low-income first-time homebuyers in purchasing single-family homes by providing funds for downpayment, closing costs, and rehabilitation carried out in conjunction with the assisted home purchase.

Type of Assistance

ADDI will provide downpayment, closing costs, and rehabilitation assistance to eligible individuals. The amount of ADDI assistance provided may not exceed $10,000 or six percent of the purchase price of the home, whichever is greater. The rehabilitation must be completed within one year of the home purchase. Rehabilitation may include, but is not limited to, the reduction of lead paint hazards and the remediation of other home health hazards.

Eligible Customers

To be eligible for ADDI assistance, individuals must be first-time homebuyers interested in purchasing single family housing. A first-time homebuyer is defined as an individual and his or her spouse who have not owned a home during the three-year period prior to the purchase of a home with ADDI assistance. ADDI funds may be used to purchase one- to four- family housing, condominium unit, cooperative unit, or manufactured housing. Additionally, individuals who qualify for ADDI assistance must have incomes not exceeding 80% of area median income.

Eligible Activities

ADDI funds may be used for downpayment, closing costs and, if necessary, rehabilitation in conjunction with home purchase. ADDI funds used for rehabilitation may not exceed twenty percent of the participating jurisdiction's total ADDI allocation. The rehabilitation assisted with ADDI funds must be completed within one year of the home purchase.

Funding Status

In FY 2007, Congress appropriated $24,750,000 for ADDI. Previously, Congress appropriated $74,513,000 in FY2003 and $86,984 in FY2004, $49,600,000 in FY2005 and $24,750,000 in FY2006. HUD has issued formula allocations for FY 2007 to assist participating jurisdictions in preparing their consolidated plans.

Obtaining Assistance

First, check the formula allocation page to determine whether your local HOME administering agency received ADDI funding. If they did not receive ADDI funding, ADDI funds may be available through your state. Every state received ADDI funds. The contacts for state are available in the HOME administering agency list.
USATODAY.com - Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY

In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.

In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.

Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

The FHA isn't a direct lender, but guarantees loan payments for mortgages on moderately priced owner-occupied property. The FHA guarantee now permits private lenders to finance as much as 97% of the purchase price of a home for millions of low- and middle-income borrowers.

In the proposal soon to be delivered to Congress, Bush would allow the FHA to guarantee loans for the full purchase price of the home, plus down-payment costs. As a practical matter, the FHA would guarantee mortgages as high as 103% of the value of the underlying property.
 
Last edited:
And the insanity CONTINUES: :lol: This could be posted in several threads.

What are We/They thinking?

An Obama Treasury department official behind the consumer protection language in the proposed financial reform legislation is a former head of the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), the advocacy wing of a non-profit community development lender funded by none other than John Paulson — the billionaire who worked with Goldman Sachs to package bad mortgages into securities and offer them on the market.


Obama Treasury official who worked on subprime markets is writing consumer financial protection legislation? | Washington Examiner
 
It's so interesting how the rightwingnuts can take something true, and use it to advance their own hate and homophobia.

And they wonder why moderates can't vote for them? Their lunacy always shows.

:cuckoo:


what wads actually said, despite the mischaracterization of the rightwingnuts who didn't get past the title given to the comments, the culture of the SEC during the bush admin was do nothing... do not regulate.

ended up people had nothing to do. and it was so bad that what they DID do was download porn. instead of responding to that, it's made into a homophobic rant because you can't justify what your losers did.

It's a pretty mainstream belief that the United States didn't come into existence on January 21, 2001. The responsibility for this extends to many administrations both Democrat and Republican. Frank chose to single out the Bush Administration because he believes that it's still OK to blame the other guy for his, and many others involved in the regulation of our financial industry, failure to act, his failure to see what was coming despite numerous signs and warnings. Frank is an incompetent ignoramus and has no business being in Congress. We need lawmakers looking out for America...not lawmakers looking for ways to ignore reality and blame the other guy.
 
Last edited:
Money wasn't the problem, moron.

If the SEC could afford to pay people over $200K per year to Surf Pr0n, then they had plenty of money.

Or do you think they should have hired even more people to Surf Pr0n all day?
 

Forum List

Back
Top