Baptist minister molested so many boys "he can't remember how many"

[Syriusly]

As said above, terminology is important. A man who molests boys is a HOMOSEXUAL. He is sexually attracted to people of his own gender. That what the word means.

One can observe that he is a homosexual whose sexual maturation was stunted for some reason, and probably suppressed, but the inclination is there, which defines him as homosexual.

But this is not a general indictment of homosexuals any more than observing that men who abuse little girls are heterosexual.

But a man who is an "open" homosexual and has "normal" relationships with other men is no more likely to molest children than a heterosexual adult who relates normally to his spouse. Almost NONE of the abusers who have come to light in recent decades have been "open" homosexuals, and yet many of them have been married, with wives and kids. One might almost conclude that an open homosexual is less likely to be a child abuser than a married man.

The point is that "openly" homosexual men are attracted to teenage boys just as "normal" heterosexual men are attracted to teenage girls. No parent in his/her right mind would allow a "normal" heterosexual man to supervise a camp full of teenage girls but the quirky left wing mentality would force the BSA to allow an "openly" homosexual man to supervise teenage boys.

The minister who molested these boys was an openly heterosexual man.

A children’s pastor and father of two boys in Muscle Shoals, Alabama pleaded guilty on Thursday to 31 counts of second-degree sodomy, two counts of possession of pictures of underage children, and three counts of sexually abusing a child under twelve.

The reality is that Boy Scouts have a history of concealing child molestation- that occurred while it banned homosexuals from being troop leaders.

The boy scout leaders- like this minister- tended to be fathers, and grandfathers, who molested boys.

These are men who are child molesters. They are also heterosexuals.

When people like you go around yelling about the 'homosexuals' molesting boys' you make it easier for the Jerry Sandusky's of the world- the openly heterosexual fathers and grandfathers and stepfathers- to be out there molesting our boys and girls.

All child molesters should be dealt with harshly- and our children should be defended from persons who are most likely to molest them.

And by the way- those persons are overwhelmingly men.

IF your only concern was protecting boys from the possibility of being sexually molested, you would insist that no men be allowed to supervise boys.

I mean if your concern was really for the boys welfare.