Backed Into A Corner, Boehner Admits That Obama Is Not A Socialist

If Boner (Boehner) doesn't think Obama is a socialist, then WHY THE FUCK WAS HE SAYING IT JUST A LITTLE WHILE AGO?

Seems like the GOP has lost it's spine. Started when Steele had to back down to Limp Idiot (hows THAT one for irony), and the GOP has been backing down whenever publicly challenged since.

So much for the GOP.
 
If Boner (Boehner) doesn't think Obama is a socialist, then WHY THE FUCK WAS HE SAYING IT JUST A LITTLE WHILE AGO?

Seems like the GOP has lost it's spine. Started when Steele had to back down to Limp Idiot (hows THAT one for irony), and the GOP has been backing down whenever publicly challenged since.

So much for the GOP.

They'll just have to keep focusing on their prime message now, which is "That ******'s going to kill your granny!"

I doubt it will get them very far, but we'll see if they back down from that, too.
 
Last edited:
Boner may have been trapped, but it wasn't by the interview.........

It was his own blind loyalty to a corrupt party and stupidity that trapped him.
 
The Hope Change Brigade has so little to cheer for these days.

LOL

This is hilarious

That's it? That's the movie?

LOLOLOLOL
 
the problem is, obama is not 100% socialist, his actions so far though have absolutely had socialist characteristics....take over of GM for instance....

there are some things about capitalism that are just to good to pass up and a true socialism doesn't work, so obama is slowly trying to get as much socialism in because he knows the american public won't support and he his controller soros won't allow a full socialist movement
 
Americans has hard time accepting that socialism is already here. If nobody else, Chinese would know what is socialism. They are laughing at us now...

ObaMao - ChinaDaily

001ec95974af0c1d1c8201.jpg
 
Michael Steele has had a good couple of weeks, and appears to be finding his voice and grounding as the RNC Chair...

_____

Yet, thanks to Jimmy Carter's outrageous remarks about how much of the criticism of President Obama is "based on racism" and stems from "a belief among many white people ... that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country," Steele is finding his voice...

Steele is firing back. He accused Carter of being "dead wrong" and "out of line" in a way that serves to "diminish real instances of racism that need to be addressed." Later, during an interview by CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Steele blasted Johnson's comments about white hoods and intimidating people as "an ignorant statement" and insisted that it is "beyond anyone's comprehension that you can make that leap..."

But where Steele really delivered was when he tried to turn the tables on Democrats who are criticizing Rep. Joe Wilson and insist that many of those who represent poor and minority constituents are doing more harm than the South Carolinian who called out Obama.

"You tell me where racism really exists," Steele said. "Is it in the words of a congressman who says 'you lie'? Or is it how we strip education funding through opportunity scholarships? Or is it how we cut money for our HBCUs (historically black colleges and universities) around the country? Or is it the fact that so many African-Americans still live in neighborhoods that are burnt out and run-down?"


Exactly. And Steele was just scratching the surface. He could also have mentioned how Democrats work to undermine educational reform efforts that help black students through their slavish adherence to teachers' unions. Or how liberals attack and try to discredit African-American conservatives who dare to think their own thoughts. Or how Democrats in the 1990s actually challenged using race in redistricting because they feared having minorities concentrated in one district would make surrounding districts majority Republican. Or how white Democrats worry about changing demographics as much as anyone when nonwhite Democratic voters begin to represent ever-larger shares of the Democratic electorate in states such as Arizona, Colorado, Texas and California.


RealClearPolitics - The Chairman Finds His Voice

Except today Steele went right to the race card off the bottom of the deck:

"I found that to be stunning, that the White House would send word to one of only two black governors in the country not to run for re-election," said Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, reacting to news accounts on CBS' "Face the Nation."

"That will be very interesting to see what the response from black leadership around the country will be about the president calling the governor to step down or not run for election," said Steele, who is black.
 
If Obama is a socialist, even a democratic socialist, then he's pretty piss poor at it.

this of course assumes that his agenda could get passed or become that acceptable to the american public in such a short time....he won the election solely on not being bush....or a clinton....

time will tell
 
Here is an excerpt of a piece by Mark Levin written BEFORE the debacle of an eletion which got President Obama into the White House:

* * * *

Obama's entire campaign is built on class warfare and human envy. The "change" he peddles is not new. We've seen it before. It is change that diminishes individual liberty for the soft authoritarianism of socialism. It is a populist appeal that disguises government mandated wealth redistribution as tax cuts for the middle class, falsely blames capitalism for the social policies and government corruption (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) that led to the current turmoil in our financial markets, fuels contempt for commerce and trade by stigmatizing those who run successful small and large businesses, and exploits human imperfection as a justification for a massive expansion of centralized government. Obama's appeal to the middle class is an appeal to the "the proletariat," as an infamous philosopher once described it, about which a mythology has been created. Rather than pursue the American Dream, he insists that the American Dream has arbitrary limits, limits Obama would set for the rest of us — today it's $250,000 for businesses and even less for individuals. If the individual dares to succeed beyond the limits set by Obama, he is punished for he's now officially "rich." The value of his physical and intellectual labor must be confiscated in greater amounts for the good of the proletariat (the middle class). And so it is that the middle class, the birth-child of capitalism, is both celebrated and enslaved — for its own good and the greater good. The "hope" Obama represents, therefore, is not hope at all. It is the misery of his utopianism imposed on the individual.

Unlike past Democrat presidential candidates, Obama is a hardened ideologue. He's not interested in playing around the edges. He seeks "fundamental change," i.e., to remake society. And if the Democrats control Congress with super-majorities led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, he will get much of what he demands.

The question is whether enough Americans understand what's at stake in this election and, if they do, whether they care. Is the allure of a charismatic demagogue so strong that the usually sober American people are willing to risk an Obama presidency? After all, it ensnared Adelman, Kmiec, Powell, Fried, and numerous others. And while America will certainly survive, it will do so, in many respects, as a different place.

10/25 09:29 PMShare
The Obama Temptation - Mark R. Levin - The Corner on National Review Online

I post it here, now, for a couple of reasons:

(1) Mark was amongst the first to note that at his core, President Obama is a Marxist; and

(2) I'm wondering something, now that I think about this and the close affinity for Saul Alinsky which President Obama has shown. The latter point/question I will note/ask in a separate thread.

But as to the first point, what the hell IS a "Marxist" if we can go by some concise defintion and how does one pretend to distinguish the political ideology of President Obama from that of a Marxist?
 
obama is a Marxist.

"Socialist" and "Marxist" are what Republicans call people who are smarter than they are.

Joe McCarthy did the same thing.

precisely. I have yet to see a republican on this or any other board who has the slightest idea what the true meaing of either of those terms is.

I posted the link,, ignore it if you want to, 20 years in a church that preached black liberation theology, which of course is rooted as deep as it can get in marxism.
 
Some silly goof was pontificating that any government regulation was fascism. J. Edgar Hoover would have had Mel Purvis stand him against a wall and shoot him. The death penalty would have the price for not being able to tell the difference between a socialist democrat and an authoritarin capitalist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top