Back in 2000 in debt was going down; then we elected a Republican.

Discussion in 'Economy' started by GreatDay, Aug 31, 2012.

  1. GreatDay
    Offline

    GreatDay Wasn't it?

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    436
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +37
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,066
    Thanks Received:
    6,883
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,911
    It's not Republicans that's the problem. It's the conservatives.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Warrior102
    Offline

    Warrior102 Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    16,554
    Thanks Received:
    4,019
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +4,029
  4. GreatDay
    Offline

    GreatDay Wasn't it?

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    436
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +37
    Why should anybody care about fixing it if the Repupicans are just going to fuck it up again, you see any sign they have learned anything from 2001?

    Bush's budget dilemma | The Economist

    and this

    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - Google News Archive Search

    and this

    Why the Dems Are Singing "I Told You So" on the Budget - TIME


    and this

    See budget gimmick and risk to Soc Sec - New York Daily News

    then this

    CNN.com - Lower estimated surplus stirs up budget debate - August 25, 2001


    Before we fix it this time tell me how we don’t just do this again?
     
  5. GreatDay
    Offline

    GreatDay Wasn't it?

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    436
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +37
    ALL Repulicans and all who vote for them are to blame, not just Bush...
     
  6. Leweman
    Offline

    Leweman Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,009
    Thanks Received:
    489
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +737
  7. GreatDay
    Offline

    GreatDay Wasn't it?

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    436
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +37

    In 1993 the Democrats passed a budget plan that led to a balanced budget without a single Republican vote, here is the proof:


    “The most recent projections from OMB and CBO indicate that, if current policies remain in place, the total unified surplus will reach about $800 billion in fiscal year 2010, including an on-budget surplus of almost $500 billion. Moreover, the admittedly quite uncertain long-term budget exercises released by the CBO last October maintain an implicit on-budget surplus under baseline assumptions well past 2030 despite the budgetary pressures from the aging of the baby-boom generation, especially on the major health programs.

    These most recent projections, granted their tentativeness, nonetheless make clear that the highly desirable goal of paying off the federal debt is in reach and, indeed, would occur well before the end of the decade under baseline assumptions. This is in marked contrast to the perception of a year ago, when the elimination of the debt did not appear likely until the next decade. But continuing to run surpluses beyond the point at which we reach zero or near-zero federal debt brings to center stage the critical longer-term fiscal policy issue of whether the federal government should accumulate large quantities of private (more technically, nonfederal) assets.

    At zero debt, the continuing unified budget surpluses now projected under current law imply a major accumulation of private assets by the federal government. Such an accumulation would make the federal government a significant factor in our nation's capital markets and would risk significant distortion in the allocation of capital to its most productive uses. Such a distortion could be quite costly, as it is our extraordinarily effective allocation process that has enabled such impressive increases in productivity and standards of living despite a relatively low domestic saving rate.”


    “Returning to the broader fiscal picture, I continue to believe, as I have testified previously, that all else being equal, a declining level of federal debt is desirable because it holds down long-term real interest rates, thereby lowering the cost of capital and elevating private investment. The rapid capital deepening that has occurred in the U.S. economy in recent years is a testament to these benefits. But the sequence of upward revisions to the budget surplus projections for several years now has reshaped the choices and opportunities before us.
    Indeed, in almost any credible baseline scenario, short of a major and prolonged economic contraction, the full benefits of debt reduction are now achieved well before the end of this decade--a prospect that did not seem reasonable only a year or even six months ago. Thus, the emerging key fiscal policy need is now to address the implications of maintaining surpluses beyond the point at which publicly held debt is effectively eliminated.”


    Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan
    Current fiscal issues
    Before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives
    March 2, 2001
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2012
  8. Rshermr
    Offline

    Rshermr VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,804
    Thanks Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Location:
    LaConner, WA
    Ratings:
    +855
    Yup. You have it. And, since the great repub recession of 2008, repubs have filibustered, or later, when they had the house, refused every effort of the Pres to stimulate the economy.
     
  9. tjvh
    Offline

    tjvh Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    6,893
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +916
  10. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,548
    Thanks Received:
    1,130
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,047
    and the tech bubble burst!!

    Republicans want to make debt illegal once and forever. Liberals exist to buy votes with promises of more and more welfare entitlements so of course are opposed to the Republican proposal.
     

Share This Page