AZ Sec Of State Wont Let Obama On Ballot Unless Hawaii Shows More Birth Records

Obama_Exposer

Member
May 11, 2012
107
18
6
It looks like the Arizona Secretary of State has decided that Sheriff Joe Arpaio's findings of probable cause that Obama's abstract long form birth certificate may be a forgery that it is necessary for Hawaii to provide more evidence that Obama was born there before he goes on the ballot. This actually is a first. Sec of State Ken Bennett stated:

“Because of the importance and profile of the president’s case, and at the request of many constituents, I have gone the extra step of asking the state of Hawaii to verify the facts contained in his birth certificate,” “Hawaii is bound by their own statutes to provide such verifications to other state officials in their official duties."

“With all due respect, the [Arpaio] investigation has not proven anything other than raised probable cause that the birth certificate posted on the White House website ‘may be’ a forgery. The next lawful step would be for the sheriff’s office to turn their findings over to the county attorney for prosecution,” he continued. “Evidence would be brought on both sides and a judge should issue a decision.

“Whether or not that happens, if Hawaii can’t or won’t provide verification of the president’s birth certificate, I will not put his name on the ballot,” he wrote.



All I can say is that it will be interesting what Hawaii does. They have been silent since the Maricopa County Sheriffs Department investigation findings. More can be read here.
Arizona official to Hawaii: Show birth verification
 
Last edited:
AZ Sec Of State Wont Let Obama On Ballot Unless Hawaii Shows More Birth Records

ObamaBC%2525252BandBinLaden.jpg


*



*

s-BOEHNER-large.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You'll get a letter thanking you for distracting the people from Obama's record with this stupid story. Obama couldnt have a more willing asset.
 
The OP link didn't go anywhere. So when I did a search, World Nut Daily came up.

You'd think if the SoS AZ was staying at the Waldorf Hysteria, there'd be a paper trail.
 
Well past time for Hussein to come clean.

But only if he wants to be on ballots, of course.

Well past time for you to pull your head from your ass; but only if you want to take a whiff of the real world, of course.
 
Arizona Ballot Challenge: Allen v. Obama, Arizona Democratic Party–DISMISSED

Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986 (1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702-03 (1898) (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV); Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678, 684-88 (Ind. App. 2010) (addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.

END DUMB ASS BIRFER THREAD
 
OK, last time.

Arizona can say whatever they want, but making a law that invalidates the citizenship of residents of another state, when that state has verified said person's citizenship, is ILLEGAL.

Article IV, section 1 of the Constitution specifically states the following:

Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.

Both the State of Hawaii, and the US Congress, have already stated that the documents presented are sufficient to prove Obama's natural born citizenship.

Therefore, if the Arizona legislature attempts to overrule the state of Hawaii in this matter, and attempt to illegally invalidate the records and judgement of the state of Hawaii, they should be arrested.
 

Forum List

Back
Top