Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are you a member of a well regulated militia? No? Then you get a musket.
The first amendment has more restrictions on it than the 2nd and it doesn't even have 'well regulated' in the text.
I swore a couple of oaths on the Constitution so you can kiss my ass.
Same here, and go fuck yourself. You're a disgrace to those oaths.
oh and
Hunt down your American history teacher and get a refund for your parents, b/c clearly he skipped a huge chunk.
Thank you for your service.
No, I'm not a disgrace to the oaths I took, I simply have a different take on it than you do...and last time I checked, the SCOTUS agrees that restrictions on "arms" ARE Constitutional.
So they are banning assault weapons in New York now.
I'm just curious as to whether the gun nuts in New York will actually make good on their threats to use deadly force to keep government from taking away their guns -
or will they puss out yet again?
N.Y. poised to pass toughest gun law in the nation | NJ.com
Also - what about the rest of you gun nuts? You know if you stand by and do nothing while they take the guns away in NEw York - next it will be California, then Oregon, then 20-30 states later they will get to you and by then - TOO LATE!
Same here, and go fuck yourself. You're a disgrace to those oaths.
oh and
Hunt down your American history teacher and get a refund for your parents, b/c clearly he skipped a huge chunk.
Thank you for your service.
No, I'm not a disgrace to the oaths I took, I simply have a different take on it than you do...and last time I checked, the SCOTUS agrees that restrictions on "arms" ARE Constitutional.
Outright bans are not "restrictions" and the agreed upon restrictions have not been fleshed out yet.
A restriction is no felons with guns, and a background check. A restrcition is not a ban on a commonly used firearm to an entire class of law abiding citizens.
^^ The Mohammed Ali of stoopud.
natural talent meets hard work plus a big mouth.
allow me to educate you; all these shooting occur where people know there is no one that can shoot back, b/c guns are not allowed.
I know you can't grasp that, or don't care to. But at least I tried.
The problem with absolutes...
Guns at Virginia tech
Guns at Columbine
Guns at Fort Hood
Concealed carry in Colorado
Concealed carry in Arizona
Funny that didn't stop someone from killing a bunch of people.
Guns at Virginia tech link showing students are allowed to carry
Guns at Columbine HS, no one gets to carry
Guns at Fort Hood Army base, no one gets to carry except security
Concealed carry in Colorado the theater had a no gun policy
Concealed carry in Arizona If this was for the Senator, it was a crowd of liberals, soooo
but do carry on, you might get 1 out of 5 right.
Thank you for your service.
No, I'm not a disgrace to the oaths I took, I simply have a different take on it than you do...and last time I checked, the SCOTUS agrees that restrictions on "arms" ARE Constitutional.
Outright bans are not "restrictions" and the agreed upon restrictions have not been fleshed out yet.
A restriction is no felons with guns, and a background check. A restrcition is not a ban on a commonly used firearm to an entire class of law abiding citizens.
The Amendment makes to mention of guns.
It says "Arms".
And you are "banned' from owning nuclear arms.
It's case law that's determined that.
Same here, and go fuck yourself. You're a disgrace to those oaths.
oh and
Hunt down your American history teacher and get a refund for your parents, b/c clearly he skipped a huge chunk.
Thank you for your service.
No, I'm not a disgrace to the oaths I took, I simply have a different take on it than you do...and last time I checked, the SCOTUS agrees that restrictions on "arms" ARE Constitutional.
Outright bans are not "restrictions" and the agreed upon restrictions have not been fleshed out yet.
A restriction is no felons with guns, and a background check. A restrcition is not a ban on a commonly used firearm to an entire class of law abiding citizens.
The problem with absolutes...
Guns at Virginia tech
Guns at Columbine
Guns at Fort Hood
Concealed carry in Colorado
Concealed carry in Arizona
Funny that didn't stop someone from killing a bunch of people.
Guns at Virginia tech link showing students are allowed to carry
Guns at Columbine HS, no one gets to carry
Guns at Fort Hood Army base, no one gets to carry except security
Concealed carry in Colorado the theater had a no gun policy
Concealed carry in Arizona If this was for the Senator, it was a crowd of liberals, soooo
but do carry on, you might get 1 out of 5 right.
Virginia tech has its own police force
Columbine armed guards
Fort Hood own police force
Colorado theater - do you have a picture of the sign prohibiting guns?
Arizona public fucking shopping center
Thank you for your service.
No, I'm not a disgrace to the oaths I took, I simply have a different take on it than you do...and last time I checked, the SCOTUS agrees that restrictions on "arms" ARE Constitutional.
Outright bans are not "restrictions" and the agreed upon restrictions have not been fleshed out yet.
A restriction is no felons with guns, and a background check. A restrcition is not a ban on a commonly used firearm to an entire class of law abiding citizens.
Assault weapons do not fall into the "widely used" category.
I want a nuke.
Outright bans are not "restrictions" and the agreed upon restrictions have not been fleshed out yet.
A restriction is no felons with guns, and a background check. A restrcition is not a ban on a commonly used firearm to an entire class of law abiding citizens.
The Amendment makes to mention of guns.
It says "Arms".
And you are "banned' from owning nuclear arms.
It's case law that's determined that.
A nuclear warhead is not an "arm" it is crew served artillery, which has never been allowed for private ownership.
A semi automatic rifle is an "arm" as is a semi automatic pistol, as is a shotgun.
The Amendment makes to mention of guns.
It says "Arms".
And you are "banned' from owning nuclear arms.
It's case law that's determined that.
A nuclear warhead is not an "arm" it is crew served artillery, which has never been allowed for private ownership.
A semi automatic rifle is an "arm" as is a semi automatic pistol, as is a shotgun.
It's called a nuclear armament.
Outright bans are not "restrictions" and the agreed upon restrictions have not been fleshed out yet.
A restriction is no felons with guns, and a background check. A restrcition is not a ban on a commonly used firearm to an entire class of law abiding citizens.
The Amendment makes to mention of guns.
It says "Arms".
And you are "banned' from owning nuclear arms.
It's case law that's determined that.
A nuclear warhead is not an "arm" it is crew served artillery, which has never been allowed for private ownership.
A semi automatic rifle is an "arm" as is a semi automatic pistol, as is a shotgun.
A nuclear warhead is not an "arm" it is crew served artillery, which has never been allowed for private ownership.
A semi automatic rifle is an "arm" as is a semi automatic pistol, as is a shotgun.
It's called a nuclear armament.
it has always been controlled militatily by the artillery branch of the service. Infrantymen, who typically carry "arms" have never had access to nukes.
an "armament" is another word for weapon in this case, not an "arm"
Arms have been always seen as rifles, pistols, and shotguns. single user weapons.
This is NY, we react like babies. The shit didn't even happen in our state and Coumo and crew were quick to target law abiding citizens. Meanwhile, in the toughest gun control city in the country, people are still being shot daily.
We already had an assault weapons ban in NY. All this does is further restrict law abiding citizens. It solves nothing.
Pass a balanced budget?
Not in years.
Pass legislation to restrict law abiding citizens?
They can bang that out in a few hours.
The Amendment makes to mention of guns.
It says "Arms".
And you are "banned' from owning nuclear arms.
It's case law that's determined that.
A nuclear warhead is not an "arm" it is crew served artillery, which has never been allowed for private ownership.
A semi automatic rifle is an "arm" as is a semi automatic pistol, as is a shotgun.
Sure it is an armament.
They are commonly referred to as nuclear arms.
And there are other "arms" that are prohibited. Like knives, swords, blackjacks, nunchukas, grenades, rpgs and a whole host of other things.
It's called a nuclear armament.
it has always been controlled militatily by the artillery branch of the service. Infrantymen, who typically carry "arms" have never had access to nukes.
an "armament" is another word for weapon in this case, not an "arm"
Arms have been always seen as rifles, pistols, and shotguns. single user weapons.
And why is that?
Point the the clause or section in the Constitution that covers that.
Q; What kind of low life douche is happy that Americans have had their rights removed and wants to see people that want to keep their rights killed?
A; A typical run of the mil liberal.
pfft
To think I was once innocent enough to think that just a few liberals were fucked in the head. clearly the majority of them are complete scum.
It is pretty scummy to want to figure out a way to prevent innocent people and children from being mass slaughtered. Great point!
Your "gun rights" are not "removed" by having some weapons off limits.
"Well regulated" is clearly stated.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Go hunt down your english teachers and beat the fuck out of them for not teaching you reading comprehension.
or admit you're a lying douche that doesn't give a fuck about the Constitution.
Are you a member of a well regulated militia? No? Then you get a musket.
The first amendment has more restrictions on it than the 2nd and it doesn't even have 'well regulated' in the text.
I swore a couple of oaths on the Constitution so you can kiss my ass.
