Once more for the slow kid: nuclear power WORKS. Solar and wind is pixie dust and unicorn flatulence.
Still produces more energy than butthurt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once more for the slow kid: nuclear power WORKS. Solar and wind is pixie dust and unicorn flatulence.
They aren't profitable.Why do you think big business is against solar and wind energy.
And if developed to be so, they threaten the profitable status quo.
Big business simply doesn't care where the energy comes from, as long as it's reliable and cost effective.
Solar and wind being neither.
As, say, nucyulur wasn't without the massive subsidies propping it up -- which it still gets.
That's exactly why I said "And if developed to be so". That's part of any infrastructural development that government plays a key role in building.
They aren't profitable.
And if developed to be so, they threaten the profitable status quo.
Big business simply doesn't care where the energy comes from, as long as it's reliable and cost effective.
Solar and wind being neither.
As, say, nucyulur wasn't without the massive subsidies propping it up -- which it still gets.
That's exactly why I said "And if developed to be so". That's part of any infrastructural development that government plays a key role in building.
Horseshit. Oil didn't need huge subsidies to become a huge industry. Neither did coal or natural gas. Nuclear probably didn't even need them, although it did get plenty of them.
And if developed to be so, they threaten the profitable status quo.
Big business simply doesn't care where the energy comes from, as long as it's reliable and cost effective.
Solar and wind being neither.
As, say, nucyulur wasn't without the massive subsidies propping it up -- which it still gets.
That's exactly why I said "And if developed to be so". That's part of any infrastructural development that government plays a key role in building.
Horseshit. Oil didn't need huge subsidies to become a huge industry. Neither did coal or natural gas. Nuclear probably didn't even need them, although it did get plenty of them.
Oh but they did, Finger Boy. And you're using the fruits of those subsidies right now as you read this.
That's right --- you're a Statist.
Big Tax Authoritarians don't every teach this 150+ year travesty in public school:
Citizenship
A 'window tax' was first introduced in 1696. It was a tax on light and air; and despite its unpopularity, it was not abolished until 1851. Because houses with more than a certain number of windows were liable to be taxed, house owners often, reluctantly, blocked up windows, and there was a tendency to include fewer windows when new houses were built. Reproduced here is a petition requesting that ministers of the Church of Scotland be exempted from paying the tax, together with the Treasury's reply refusing to grant exemption.
In the United States they started taxing the rain. How long before the "pro-environment" crowd drops this hammer?
Nobody taxes rain....but if you block natural seepage you can be taxed
In NH a friend of mine pays a "view tax" because he lives in a scenic areaBig Tax Authoritarians don't every teach this 150+ year travesty in public school:
Citizenship
A 'window tax' was first introduced in 1696. It was a tax on light and air; and despite its unpopularity, it was not abolished until 1851. Because houses with more than a certain number of windows were liable to be taxed, house owners often, reluctantly, blocked up windows, and there was a tendency to include fewer windows when new houses were built. Reproduced here is a petition requesting that ministers of the Church of Scotland be exempted from paying the tax, together with the Treasury's reply refusing to grant exemption.
In the United States they started taxing the rain. How long before the "pro-environment" crowd drops this hammer?