Audacity of Nope: Supermax Prison Calls Obama Books Objectionable

Here is the TITLE of the original AP release:

Supermax prison: Obama's books objectionable
By MATTHEW BARAKAT
Associated Press

Do you see anything therein that says "AUDACITY OF NOPE"?????? It's F.A.U.X news doing their usual biased embellishing by re-naming the title in its headline, which of course took off and every fucking radical rightie on the globe only read THAT faux title.
i see no difference
the say basiccally the same thing
only a fucking moron like you would think otherwise

and next time, include a LINK to that AP story

No difference? Why did FAUX need to preface the article with "AUDACITY OF NOPE"????

And you need to get KittenKoder to fix your search engine. Any 3-year old could find the original article, but here ya go. And don't ask again. Do your own fucking homework.

The Associated Press: Supermax prison: Obama's books objectionable
sorry bitch, its YOUR job to include the link, not mine

and you really need to seek out help with your obsession with Fox News
 
Last edited:
In his second term, both of Barry's books and another yet to come pamphlet concerning the expected behavior of loyal subjects will become required reading in all government schools and mosques. It won't matter what the prison officials say because all prisoners will be released.

We'll all be required to say :udaman: every hour on the hour.
 
In his second term, both of Barry's books and another yet to come pamphlet concerning the expected behavior of loyal subjects will become required reading in all government schools and mosques. It won't matter what the prison officials say because all prisoners will be released.

We'll all be required to say :udaman: every hour on the hour.

Good one! Soon you will have medals and an honored designated position on USMB!!
 
EVERYONE should read his books. They are quite telling. Like Gore and Hitler, no one really read their books or paid much attention to them either until it was too late.

Here's a parlor game:

Who AM I?

Our first contestant gives this narrative:

"I was raised in one country but my father was born in another. I was not his only child. He fathered several children with a number of women. I became very close to my mother because my father showed little interest in me. Then my mother died at an early age from cancer. Later in life, questions arose over my real name. My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a reliable birth certificate.

I grew up practicing one faith, but converted to Christianity because this was widely accepted in my country. But I practiced non-traditional beliefs and did not follow mainstream Christianity. I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and I embarked on a new career.

I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child. I became active in local politics when I was in my 30s and then burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office when I was in my 40s.

I had a virtually non-existent resume, very little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization. Yet I was a powerful speaker who managed to draw incredibly large crowds during my public appearances.

At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy. I was critical of my country in the last war. But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy. I had a plan on how we could do better. I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. Mine was a peoples campaign. The atmosphere was right, and I stressed the negative. Exaggerated it to the extreme, feeding off people's negative emotions.

I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support. I offered the people the hope that together we could change our country and the world. I spoke on behalf of the downtrodden including persecuted minorities such as Jews, but my actual views were not widely known until after I became my nations leader.

However, anyone could have easily learned what I really believed if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with. But they did not. Then I became the most powerful man in the world. And then the world learned the truth. Who am I?"
 
How the hell do PRISON OFFICIALS determine what is "potentially detrimental to national security"?

Load of prison-official, control-freaking blather, that.
Probably because those books DIVULGE FAR TOO MUCH PERSONAL INFORMATION about our CinC.

When I said "everyone" should read his books earlier, I am of course exempting terrorists in Supermax. Or Gitmo, for that matter.
 
]EVERYONE should read his books. [/B]They are quite telling. Like Gore and Hitler, no one really read their books or paid much attention to them either until it was too late.

Here's a parlor game:

Who AM I?

Our first contestant gives this narrative:

"I was raised in one country but my father was born in another. I was not his only child. He fathered several children with a number of women. I became very close to my mother because my father showed little interest in me. Then my mother died at an early age from cancer. Later in life, questions arose over my real name. My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a reliable birth certificate.

I grew up practicing one faith, but converted to Christianity because this was widely accepted in my country. But I practiced non-traditional beliefs and did not follow mainstream Christianity. I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and I embarked on a new career.

I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child. I became active in local politics when I was in my 30s and then burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office when I was in my 40s.

I had a virtually non-existent resume, very little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization. Yet I was a powerful speaker who managed to draw incredibly large crowds during my public appearances.

At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy. I was critical of my country in the last war. But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy. I had a plan on how we could do better. I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. Mine was a peoples campaign. The atmosphere was right, and I stressed the negative. Exaggerated it to the extreme, feeding off people's negative emotions.

I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support. I offered the people the hope that together we could change our country and the world. I spoke on behalf of the downtrodden including persecuted minorities such as Jews, but my actual views were not widely known until after I became my nations leader.

However, anyone could have easily learned what I really believed if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with. But they did not. Then I became the most powerful man in the world. And then the world learned the truth. Who am I?"

somebody generous enough to loan them to me will have to come along cause I damn sure ain't gonna spend no money on em
 

Forum List

Back
Top