Attorney for Cain accuser: Cain is lying

[Si modo]

I guess the racist libs don't understand that Dems mad the Jim Crow laws. Just like the racist Dems started the KKK.

And here we are again with racist libs going after Herman Cain.

What's really funny.... they're high fiving a right wing racist... Matthew. Politics makes for strange bedfellows. Personally, I have higher standards than to high five a racist for anything.

And David Duke loves the OWS.

Hmmmm.

 

[bripat9643]

I did hear one legal analyst state that by talking about the settlement in public, Cain actually violated the terms of the "gag order" where the settlement stated that it wouldn't be discussed. So it, according to the analyst, "frees up" the supposedly injured party to go public with her (we are assuming it's a her) case.

It appears the woman or her attorneys discussed it first. Otherwise, how would we know about it?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Cain has repeatedly demonstrating a glaring inability to handle adversity. He made a mess of the abortion issue, a mess of questions surrounding his tax scheme,

and now he's made a mess of this.

You people on the right have 7 candidates in your race. Why would you throw in with this bungler?

He's a pretend candidate; he always was. When are you going to wake up and realize that?

 

[LilOlLady]

Cain is a flip flopper. First he did not remember and now he remembers selectively.

 

[LilOlLady]

Democrats of the Jim Crow era are all dead and the KKK has been taken over by the Republicans.

 

[Full-Auto]

Democrats of the Jim Crow era are all dead and the KKK has been taken over by the Republicans.

Not accurate.

The skinheads voted for Kerry. Then refused to vote last election.

But thanks

 

[Avatar4321]

an attorney says someone else is lying? Shocking development. After all, there isn't an attorney before who has never lied or spun on behalf of a client.

Seriously, when this woman tells her own story and the facts back her up, that will be one thing, but until she has the guts to do that, too bad.

And if she wants to speak up so badly, no one is stopping her. She just has to return the money she took from the company. Which really wouldn be difficult even if she is lying through her teeth because any media outlet would likely pay her more.

And if she isn't. well, isnt the truth more important than money?

Either way, playing surrogate with the attorney in an attempt to have it both ways is pretty pathetic. It doesn't speak much for her credibility.

 

[MarcATL]

an attorney says someone else is lying? Shocking development. After all, there isn't an attorney before who has never lied or spun on behalf of a client.

Seriously, when this woman tells her own story and the facts back her up, that will be one thing, but until she has the guts to do that, too bad.

And if she wants to speak up so badly, no one is stopping her. She just has to return the money she took from the company. Which really wouldn be difficult even if she is lying through her teeth because any media outlet would likely pay her more.

And if she isn't. well, isnt the truth more important than money?

Either way, playing surrogate with the attorney in an attempt to have it both ways is pretty pathetic. It doesn't speak much for her credibility.

Three words for ya bub: NDA

Let Cain free her up to speak!

 

[FuelRod]

She's waiting on the highest bidder.

 

[jillian]

What happened to attorney-client privilege?

he didn't violate it. cain isn't his client.

 

[jillian]

She's waiting on the highest bidder.

there isn't anything to indicate that. she's waiting to be released from the confidentiality agreement.

because she says the facts aren't as herman said they were. (shocking, i know....)

 

[Si modo]

an attorney says someone else is lying? Shocking development. After all, there isn't an attorney before who has never lied or spun on behalf of a client.

Seriously, when this woman tells her own story and the facts back her up, that will be one thing, but until she has the guts to do that, too bad.

And if she wants to speak up so badly, no one is stopping her. She just has to return the money she took from the company. Which really wouldn be difficult even if she is lying through her teeth because any media outlet would likely pay her more.

And if she isn't. well, isnt the truth more important than money?

Either way, playing surrogate with the attorney in an attempt to have it both ways is pretty pathetic. It doesn't speak much for her credibility.

Three words for ya bub: NDA

Let Cain free her up to speak!

If the NDA is between Cain and the woman, you have a point.

If the NDA is between the association and the woman, Cain can't do shit about it.

Apparently, with the little information we have, the association paid the women, so the NDA is between them and the women.

Cain has no control over that.

 

[jillian]

If the NDA is between Cain and the woman, you have a point.

If the NDA is between the association and the woman, Cain can't do shit about it.

Apparently, with the little information we have, the association paid the women, so the NDA is between them and the women.

Cain has no control over that.

the NRA has no reason not to release the woman to speak except to protect Cain. if cain had the power to make them responsible for his actions monetarily, why would you think he has no power over the circumstances?

 

[FuelRod]

She's waiting on the highest bidder.

there isn't anything to indicate that. she's waiting to be released from the confidentiality agreement.

because she says the facts aren't as herman said they were. (shocking, i know....)

You may know the law but I know the media.
Probably a case of us both being right.

 

[Si modo]

If the NDA is between Cain and the woman, you have a point.

If the NDA is between the association and the woman, Cain can't do shit about it.

Apparently, with the little information we have, the association paid the women, so the NDA is between them and the women.

Cain has no control over that.

the NRA has no reason not to release the woman to speak except to protect Cain.

....

Then if they don't have any reason not to, they will.

But, Cain cannot, if the NDA is between the NRA and the women. If the NRA paid them, which apparently they did, then those are the parties of the NDA.

.... if cain had the power to make them responsible for his actions monetarily, why would you think he has no power over the circumstances?

"Had" is the operative word. Because, obviously, it has been years since Cain had been on the board (or an officer) of the NRA.

 

[edthecynic]

I guess the racist libs don't understand that Dems mad the Jim Crow laws. Just like the racist Dems started the KKK.

And here we are again with racist libs going after Herman Cain.

Actually it was CON$ervative racists who made the Jim Crow laws and CON$ervative racists who started the KKK. When CON$ervative racists who would not renounce their racism were rejected by the Democratic Party in the 1960s, the CON$ervative racists were welcomed with open arms by the GOP. Now the CON$ervative racists completely dominate the Republican Party. Racism is a CON$ervative thing, not a Dem or Rep thing. Racism is a sacrament in the hate religion of CON$ervatism.

 

[Si modo]

I guess the racist libs don't understand that Dems mad the Jim Crow laws. Just like the racist Dems started the KKK.

And here we are again with racist libs going after Herman Cain.

Actually it was CON$ervative racists who made the Jim Crow laws and CON$ervative racists who started the KKK. When CON$ervative racists who would not renounce their racism were rejected by the Democratic Party in the 1960s, the CON$ervative racists were welcomed with open arms by the GOP. Now the CON$ervative racists completely dominate the Republican Party. Racism is a CON$ervative thing, not a Dem or Rep thing. Racism is a sacrament in the hate religion of CON$ervatism.

Like the poster said - Democrats.

 

[edthecynic]

I guess the racist libs don't understand that Dems mad the Jim Crow laws. Just like the racist Dems started the KKK.

And here we are again with racist libs going after Herman Cain.

Actually it was CON$ervative racists who made the Jim Crow laws and CON$ervative racists who started the KKK. When CON$ervative racists who would not renounce their racism were rejected by the Democratic Party in the 1960s, the CON$ervative racists were welcomed with open arms by the GOP. Now the CON$ervative racists completely dominate the Republican Party. Racism is a CON$ervative thing, not a Dem or Rep thing. Racism is a sacrament in the hate religion of CON$ervatism.

Like the poster said - Democrats.

Like I said, CON$ervative Democrats who became CON$ervative Republicans in the 1960s.

 

[Si modo]

Actually it was CON$ervative racists who made the Jim Crow laws and CON$ervative racists who started the KKK. When CON$ervative racists who would not renounce their racism were rejected by the Democratic Party in the 1960s, the CON$ervative racists were welcomed with open arms by the GOP. Now the CON$ervative racists completely dominate the Republican Party. Racism is a CON$ervative thing, not a Dem or Rep thing. Racism is a sacrament in the hate religion of CON$ervatism.

Like the poster said - Democrats.

Like I said, CON$ervative Democrats who became CON$ervative Republicans in the 1960s.

Right. DEMOCRATS were against civil rights and who made Jim Crow laws and who started the KKK.

Democrats did that.

Democrats.

 

[edthecynic]

Like the poster said - Democrats.

Like I said, CON$ervative Democrats who became CON$ervative Republicans in the 1960s.

Right. DEMOCRATS were against civil rights and who made Jim Crow laws and who started the KKK.

Democrats did that.

Democrats.

That's right CON$ervatives were against civil rights and CON$ervatives made Jim Crow laws and it was CON$ervatives who started the KKK. CON$ervatives who are no longer welcome in the Democratic Party. CON$ervatives who are NOW Republicans.

CON$ervatives did that.

CON$ervatives.