Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I appreciate your IQ testing ability, but let's stay the course on topic here.
All Iran has to do is abide by the UN resolutions... hmmm... so the UN is an authority worth respecting, then? If so - all nations should abide by international law - did you ever answer the question about your stance? Should everyone have to obey the law - or only some?
Bill Clinton did a lot of things, be specific.
China is a communist state in name only. The Central Committee has adopted free market mechanisms while trying to retain control of those mechanisms. They will soon find they have a tiger by the tail, and it will soon turn on them. As for propping up NK, they just do it to piss off the Bush administration.
Oh ok...so China bases their foreign policy on their dislike for Bush? What was their reason before that?
Yeah, as I pointed out earlier, Chimpy and Co's inaction made it possible for Kim Jong Il and NK to devalop their nukes. Horsecrap and you know it; you are ignoring a whole bunch of histor there bubba.....But they don't have a delivery system, unless you count ox-carts. The Tae Pho Dong only stayed up 42 seconds before it came down. I have heard, however, that they are developing a new missile called the Ciallis that'll stay up for 36 hours. Very funny, but I'm with you, lets wait until they get the delivery system, after all we waited unitl they got the nuke! then we can wait for them to hit a city in Japan. Wait, then we wait until they hit a city in CA (SF maybe?) but better wait unitl they hit Chicago just to be sure!
Sorry,but I disagree. not that we should not be involved in the turmoil. but simply in the fact a nuclear confrontation would not stay simply between the two opposing factors, but would likely result in the destruction of most of the civilization of the world. Using Nukes, is committing suicide. What we should be doing is getting rid of them world-wide INCLUDING, and especially OUR OWN.Whether or not Iran attacks Israel should be none of our concern. The United States should not interfere in a fued between two terrorist nations.
glockmail, it is no wonder you get banned. look at this whole post.Get real. Don't be an asshole idiot.
1. Iran has pubilically STATED that they will destroy Israel. No prediction necessary.
2. Conducting WAR and killing your enemy is not illegal. To think otherwise is stoopid.
By and large, I agree.Who said anything about fighting? Is that what you really want to do? If so, go have at it. If we'd played our cards right, Iran wouldn't have resorted to the development of nuclear weapons. But Chimpy and Co would rather bask in their opium dreams of Middle-Eastern hegemony than actually do the work of negotiating with some one they don't like. It's called the "Paris Hilton School of Diplomacy". Don't talk to anyone you don't like. On the world stage that doesn't so much work.
As for Communism, It's pretty much failed everywhere it's been tried. It was dying a natural death by the time Reagan came to office.
Glad to see you haven't changed though. Your posts are still the same name-calling, adolescent, temper tantrums you've aways had.
glockmail, it is no wonder you get banned. look at this whole post.
Asshole, stupid, stoopid, cuckoo ??????
now to sensible things.
It is true that years ago, those statenments were made by OTHERS, not the ones presently in power. It is now pure reteric, and such reteric has been toned down.
Oh wow then. I'll take the word of your commie lover over real facts anyday. Not.No, in fact, there was a debate about six months ago on another board I post on. Actually spoke to somebody who lived in the Soviet Union for 20 years (an American believe it or not). She said the Soviet Union was fucked from about the 1930s and Raygun had very little to do with it..
Iran stated what EXACTLY? Please reprint the statement instead of paraphrasing.
Conducting war and killing your 'enemy' can be legal, it can illegal.
Nuremburg showed that there is such a thing as 'law' when war is undertaken.
*Please read, and then re-read that sentence until you understand that I am not comparing the Nazis to anyone, just the idea that war can be legal and/or illegal.
yes, I read them, and they didn't say what you seem to think they say.Just a bit out of touch are we? Recent statements by the leader of Iran calling for the destrction of Israel, etc. ring a bell?
Yeah right. Iran is developing nukes bevause of Bush. Of course you totally ignore the fact that they have been working on this SINCE THE CLINTON YEARS.Who said anything about fighting? Is that what you really want to do? If so, go have at it. If we'd played our cards right, Iran wouldn't have resorted to the development of nuclear weapons. ........
Actually I got banned for replying to an asshole. And banned FOREVER. By some fat bitch that no longer has NAZI power, what was her name?glockmail, it is no wonder you get banned. look at this whole post.
Asshole, stupid, stoopid, cuckoo ??????
now to sensible things.
It is true that years ago, those statenments were made by OTHERS, not the ones presently in power. It is now pure reteric, and such reteric has been toned down.
yes, I read them, and they didn't say what you seem to think they say.
SO Bully you think China's foreign policy is based on Bush...isn't that a bit shortsighted on their part?
Actually I got banned for replying to an asshole. And banned FOREVER. By some fat bitch that no longer has NAZI power, what was her name?
Yeah right. Iran is developing nukes bevause of Bush. Of course you totally ignore the fact that they have been working on this SINCE THE CLINTON YEARS.
As a liberal, explain something to me please: Why do y'all have your heads so far up your asses with regards to just about every issue?
Any military action against Iran's atomic programme is likely to backfire and accelerate Tehran's development of a nuclear bomb, a report today by a British former nuclear weapons scientist warns.
The 'asshole' was trying to engage you in a debate. Rather than rise to the challenge you resorted then, as now, with speech better fitted to Paris Hilton having a temper tantrum...You know...name calling...ad hominem attacks...base vulgarity. Are you simply trailer trash trying pass himself off as his betters?
And as for woman you mention, she's a far better person than you could ever aspire to be.
You mean that asshole? Delicious irony.maineman said:fuck off and pound sand
