Atlas Shrugged.........

are you claiming capitalism died in 1913,.

dear, the Fed was created in 1913 and not as a capitalist institution but you would not say it killed all of capitalism just the part that relates to the money supply
it can be claimed that simply having a central bank control the money supply through fiscal policy means socialism is the Boss in the monetary relationship with capitalism in our mixed-market economy, and, that vote of "no confidence" in Capitalism when it matters most.

Is it any wonder why some on the left believe and have Faith in the acquisition and possession of more (perfect) knowledge of good and evil of Capitalism so we can merely use Capitalism for all of its worth and still maintain social risk management control over the "evils" of unregulated lucre.
 
it can be claimed that simply having a central bank control the money supply through fiscal policy means socialism is the Boss.

so now you're admitting there was no capitalism in 1929 to be bailed out??

Isn't learning fun? Your big nazi lie just collapsed around your liberal feet.
 
it can be claimed that simply having a central bank control the money supply through fiscal policy means socialism is the Boss.

so now you're admitting there was no capitalism in 1929 to be bailed out??

Isn't learning fun? Your big nazi lie just collapsed around your liberal feet.
dear; in my opinion, capitalism finally bailed and left its stockholders, holding the capital bag in 1929; the smarter capital money knew to diversify with the creation of a central bank, earlier.
 
capitalism finally bailed and left its stockholders, holding the capital bag in 1929;

100% stupid!! you already admitted that there was no capitalism in 1929 which was 16 years after Fed was created. Dies the idiot understand that the Fed gives the govt a 100% govt monopoly on creating money???
 
capitalism finally bailed and left its stockholders, holding the capital bag in 1929;

100% stupid!! you already admitted that there was no capitalism in 1929 which was 16 years after Fed was created. Dies the idiot understand that the Fed gives the govt a 100% govt monopoly on creating money???
it was the final, "nail in the coffin" in 1929.

And, no it doesn't. There is no way to Prohibit private sector paper if it is agreed to and upheld by the parties involved.
 
dear, is the dichotomy of a public sector and a private sector too difficult for you; it is about capitalism and socialism.


100% stupid!! you already admitted that there was no capitalism in 1929 which was 16 years after Fed was created. Does the idiot liberal understand that the Fed gives the govt a 100% govt monopoly on creating money and that the creation of money or lack thereof was at the heart of what happened in 1929???
 
dear, is the dichotomy of a public sector and a private sector too difficult for you; it is about capitalism and socialism.


100% stupid!! you already admitted that there was no capitalism in 1929 which was 16 years after Fed was created. Does the idiot liberal understand that the Fed gives the govt a 100% govt monopoly on creating money and that the creation of money or lack thereof was at the heart of what happened in 1929???
it is about relative versus absolute instead of just diversion without any care or any Cause.

True capitalism hasn't existed since man invent the concept of the other Peoples' monies to leverage Capitalism to accomplish Statism and Statehood.

1929 was about unregulated private money.
 
1929 was about unregulated private money.

100% stupid of course since Federal Reserve had been created in 1913 to have 100% control of money regulation.
 
A company is doing well so they reward their employees, and ANYONE has a problem with this? There was a company a while ago that gave everyone in the company a new BMW for Christmas. How many people quit there because "less deserving employees were in essence getting a $40,000 raise this year".

Cons whine about EVERYTHING.

If you are mad because your fellow employees got a raise and a better life and you quit, then as an employer I'd say you are not a team player and good luck in your next job.

These are people whining about making $70,000 a year. Fine, go flip hamburgers. Your choice.
 
A company is doing well so they reward their employees, and ANYONE has a problem with this? There was a company a while ago that gave everyone in the company a new BMW for Christmas. How many people quit there because "less deserving employees were in essence getting a $40,000 raise this year".

Cons whine about EVERYTHING.

If you are mad because your fellow employees got a raise and a better life and you quit, then as an employer I'd say you are not a team player and good luck in your next job.

These are people whining about making $70,000 a year. Fine, go flip hamburgers. Your choice.

dear, care to tell us what your point is?? Do you have any idea??
 

Forum List

Back
Top