Atlanta Woman Didn't Want to Offend Black Man, Ends up Killed

Bah ... only bothered with the first three .. here's why:

European News ... really ... like they know what's going on over here.
Biased ... and easily spotted from a mile away.
Suspect ... never proven, until proven in a court they are just suspects not convicts. Though I can still give you that one ... oooh one, out of how many shootings we have per year?

Though from the titles and links I cn guess at the rest:
Seattle Times ... shows that black people don't get along with hispanics a lot ... big surprise. *yawn*
Wizbang ... really, the name alone should tell you it's probably not a good source for facts, but still, one story ... no real statistics yet.
FOX ... the mall shooting wasn't gang related, the police chief (I saw the interview when it was happening) said it could be, but later they discovered it was just a few people in an argument ... guess who they arrested and was convicted by the court ...
Music Promoter ... bah, they're scum anyway so no big loss.
Using two links to the same story ... bad form, also, notice how most of those involved were *gasp* white ... they even have a picture of one of them.
NPR ... not worth the time to type this sentence reminding you it's not real news.

So ... you have still proven nothing.
 
According to the most recent census figures, blacks make up 8.2 percent of Seattle’s population and 5.7 percent of King County’s population. But nearly a third of those booked into the King County jails for homicides are black.

More than half of the 4,000 people from King County in the state prison system are black. Nationally, for every three black men in college, there are four in prison.

Black people have serious problems in this country.

Hmm .. where's the link oh great link master?
 
Bah ... only bothered with the first three .. here's why:

European News ... really ... like they know what's going on over here.
Biased ... and easily spotted from a mile away.
Suspect ... never proven, until proven in a court they are just suspects not convicts. Though I can still give you that one ... oooh one, out of how many shootings we have per year?

Though from the titles and links I cn guess at the rest:
Seattle Times ... shows that black people don't get along with hispanics a lot ... big surprise. *yawn*
Wizbang ... really, the name alone should tell you it's probably not a good source for facts, but still, one story ... no real statistics yet.
FOX ... the mall shooting wasn't gang related, the police chief (I saw the interview when it was happening) said it could be, but later they discovered it was just a few people in an argument ... guess who they arrested and was convicted by the court ...
Music Promoter ... bah, they're scum anyway so no big loss.
Using two links to the same story ... bad form, also, notice how most of those involved were *gasp* white ... they even have a picture of one of them.
NPR ... not worth the time to type this sentence reminding you it's not real news.

So ... you have still proven nothing.


If you wont recognize official news stories, then you are incapable of determining whats fact and what is not. Ive provided the links you asked for and they more than prove what ive said is true. You are embarrassed that i made you look like a dumbass (not actually that hard to do), so now you do this thing where you pretend that these news storiesw are lies and unproven, but im not buying it and neither is anyone else.

Ive provided proof of the black violence i spoke about, now its your turn. You made stupid claims about White Gangs in Capitol Hill, and white people shooting people inside seattle bars.....lets see your proof then. Without any proof, everyhting youve said is just a bunch of lies. You ARE a liar, therefore you wont provide any proof.

This was a pitiful one sided debate, and now you look like a jackass.
 
Exactly ... so why bother with the links, you wouldn't have done anything different, I am just smart enough not to bother wasting my time posting a ton of links.

Oh, and so far you are the only one who has truly lied.
 
According to the most recent census figures, blacks make up 8.2 percent of Seattle’s population and 5.7 percent of King County’s population. But nearly a third of those booked into the King County jails for homicides are black.

More than half of the 4,000 people from King County in the state prison system are black. Nationally, for every three black men in college, there are four in prison.

Black people have serious problems in this country.

Hmm .. where's the link oh great link master?

What would be the point of me providing more links for you? Im done providing links until you provide links to news stories that will back up the things YOUVE said.
 
Exactly ... so why bother with the links, you wouldn't have done anything different, I am just smart enough not to bother wasting my time posting a ton of links.

Oh, and so far you are the only one who has truly lied.


I only asked for 1 link. Just 1 current news story that talks about "white" capitol hill gangs and white shootings in seattle bars.

...and what was the lie i told?

God, you are stupid, and a liar, and you have no shame about it. Youve provided NOTHING, because you cant.
 
Last edited:
Here's the problem with your posts and why you are just wrong, no matter what evidence you think you have (not to mention that most of those who have been proven wrongfully convicted are black, but that's another post). The problem, you keep moving the concepts around and changing what the topic is about. For instance, how is it that all club shootings are now gang shootings, the original post you made kept them as two separate issues, I never once combined them, but now you are making it sound like it's all one solid topic, which is far from the original topic. End result, nothing you say can ever show you are using facts, instead t shows you will change what other people say in failed and pointless attempts to make them look bad.
 
Here's the problem with your posts and why you are just wrong, no matter what evidence you think you have (not to mention that most of those who have been proven wrongfully convicted are black, but that's another post). The problem, you keep moving the concepts around and changing what the topic is about. For instance, how is it that all club shootings are now gang shootings, the original post you made kept them as two separate issues, I never once combined them, but now you are making it sound like it's all one solid topic, which is far from the original topic. End result, nothing you say can ever show you are using facts, instead t shows you will change what other people say in failed and pointless attempts to make them look bad.


Blah, blah, blah. Provide your evidence or shut up. I provided the evidence YOU asked for, now its your turn. This is how debates work.

Provide the evidence of "white gangs in Capitol Hill", and provide evidence of "drunk white men shooting people in Seattle bars". YOU made these claims, not me, so YOU have to provide evidence of those things if you wish to use them to support your arguement.

I have nothing further to say to you until you provide evidence to back your claim, and until youve done so, i wont respond to anything you say. You have stalled long enough and if you dont provide the evidence in your very next post, i win the debate. If you dont want me to win the debate, you know what you have to do.

Personally, i think your a fucking racist liar that just made that shit up to try and make white people look bad, and when you dont provide the evidence in your next post, you will prove my theory that youre a racist liar.
 
Last edited:
Here's the problem with your posts and why you are just wrong, no matter what evidence you think you have (not to mention that most of those who have been proven wrongfully convicted are black, but that's another post). The problem, you keep moving the concepts around and changing what the topic is about. For instance, how is it that all club shootings are now gang shootings, the original post you made kept them as two separate issues, I never once combined them, but now you are making it sound like it's all one solid topic, which is far from the original topic. End result, nothing you say can ever show you are using facts, instead t shows you will change what other people say in failed and pointless attempts to make them look bad.


Blah, blah, blah. Provide your evidence or shut up. I provided the evidence YOU asked for, now its your turn. This is how debates work.

Provide the evidence of "white gangs in Capitol Hill", and provide evidence of "drunk white men shooting people in Seattle bars". YOU made these claims, not me, so YOU have to provide evidence of those things if you wish to use them to support your arguement.

I have nothing further to say to you until you provide evidence to back your claim, and until youve done so, i wont respond to anything you say. You have stalled long enough and if you dont provide the evidence in your very next post, i win the debate. If you dont want me to win the debate, you know what you have to do.

Personally, i think your a fucking liar, so you WONT post the evidence. Of course thats an easy prediction for me to make, because i already know the evidence you need does not exist, because the shit you said is untrue.

You really are dumb ... so you are saying that there are no whit Blood anywhere? Hell, I have seen white Chicos. That's like saying that all mobsters are Itallian, which were the very first gang bangers in the US.
 
I told you you couldnt do it. You ARE a racist liar. I win the debate, though i cant really be too pleased with the victory. At no point in this debate did you ever have a single worthwile point. All you had were lies, and i exposed them. Hopefully you will learn from this and not look like a complete fucking idiot the next time around...i wont hold my breath though.

Ok, im finished with you now loser. Goodbye.
 
Stop projecting onto me, and then maybe you will see how much a fool you really are. Do you even know the history of gangs and who started them in the US? White people, mostly Italian. Now they just operate under the legal status known as unions, but most are still the same. The concepts of gangs shifted to other areas, black people soon formed them but theirs were revolutionaries at the beginning just fighting for equality. Once they got equality the gangs turned on each other lacking any other enemy. Then as the gang influence in youth increased the actually achieved their goal of diversifying, containing almost equal members of all races and skin colors.

Of course that's the simplified history because well ... you know what happens when any links are posted. the best sources for this info is to look into the Encyclopedias (wiki is garbage though). The problem is that it's not under just one topic, you have to *gasp* do a little research.

As for personal experience ... almost all the gang bangers I have known were white. This completely goes against one of your claims. Almost all the junkies I know and have known are white, hell, I had a friend in Tucson nick named "Stoney" (he would smoke anything he could and take any pill you hand him), he was pale white in spite of living in the desert. Most of the ex-cons I know are white. Also, almost all those who have been proven to be wrongfully accused by DNA evidence (most have served almost all the sentences already) are black ... so this blows you whole "most the people in prison are black" because the evidence shows that being in jail doesn't mean you are a criminal, nor does being out of jail prove that you are not. So ... it is you is not being honest, or at least not using your brain, simply to justify your own hatred of people with a different skin color.

Oh ... and in case you never noticed, I'm Jewish.
 
Here's yet another case in which being a "racist" would have saved a life.

Police: 'Brazen' suspect returned to scene of Midtown slaying | ajc.com

While crossing through Aqua’s lobby, she overheard Thompson and a real-estate agent chatting about taking a tour of two condos that were for sale, Meadows said.

“She said, ‘Don’t forget about mine. It’s for sale, also,’” Meadows said.

Thompson didn’t. After the tour, a security guard called Calle and said that Thompson was in the lobby.

“Would you like for me to escort him up?” the guard asked Calle, according to Meadows.

“No, it’ll be fine,” Calle responded. “I don’t want him to think that we don’t trust him.’ “


by your logic, young and middle aged white males - those with your demographic profile, william - shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children, since the overwhelming majority of pedophiles fit your racial and age profile, William
 
Here's yet another case in which being a "racist" would have saved a life.

Police: 'Brazen' suspect returned to scene of Midtown slaying | ajc.com

While crossing through Aqua’s lobby, she overheard Thompson and a real-estate agent chatting about taking a tour of two condos that were for sale, Meadows said.

“She said, ‘Don’t forget about mine. It’s for sale, also,’” Meadows said.

Thompson didn’t. After the tour, a security guard called Calle and said that Thompson was in the lobby.

“Would you like for me to escort him up?” the guard asked Calle, according to Meadows.

“No, it’ll be fine,” Calle responded. “I don’t want him to think that we don’t trust him.’ “


by your logic, young and middle aged white males - those with your demographic profile, william - shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children, since the overwhelming majority of pedophiles fit your racial and age profile, William

Not to mention they are the overwhelming majority of serial killers also!
 
by your logic, young and middle aged white males - those with your demographic profile, william - shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children, since the overwhelming majority of pedophiles fit your racial and age profile, William

If I were on the hunt for a pedophile, yeah, I'd probably concentrate on white males. But statistically, we're probably talking about way less than one percent of white males. As for black violence, the chances are far higher.

Anyway, as a liberal, you probably support child rape as an "alternative sexuality", so why would you care?
 
by your logic, young and middle aged white males - those with your demographic profile, william - shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children, since the overwhelming majority of pedophiles fit your racial and age profile, William

If I were on the hunt for a pedophile, yeah, I'd probably concentrate on white males. But statistically, we're probably talking about way less than one percent of white males. As for black violence, the chances are far higher.

Anyway, as a liberal, you probably support child rape as an "alternative sexuality", so why would you care?

Um ... you do realize that the black people in your neighborhood are not the only ones in the world ... right?
 
Um ... you do realize that the black people in your neighborhood are not the only ones in the world ... right?

Stats for black crime I would imagine have some uniformity across the country. Wherever there's a high concentration of blacks -- Camden, NJ, Detroit, Washington, D.C. -- you've got crime, and lots of it. Everyone pretty much seems to get this, including blacks, who move out of black neighborhoods if they can.
 
Um ... you do realize that the black people in your neighborhood are not the only ones in the world ... right?

Stats for black crime I would imagine have some uniformity across the country. Wherever there's a high concentration of blacks -- Camden, NJ, Detroit, Washington, D.C. -- you've got crime, and lots of it. Everyone pretty much seems to get this, including blacks, who move out of black neighborhoods if they can.

Okay ... let's expand to the whole country ... do you really think that all the black people in the US are not the only ones in the world?
 

Forum List

Back
Top