At this juncture, the RW rejects the science of man-made climate change because it scares them

[Billy_Bob]

Also, your graph means dick considering the global average temperature has increased at an extraordinary rate in the last 100 years or so.

Guess you can't read a graph...if you could, then you would see that the fraction of a degree that we have seen over the past 150 years pales when compared to...oh, say the 3 degree increase in roughly 100 years at 8100 years ago...and if you look at the graph for the northern hemisphere that I provided, you all see nearly a 3.5 degree increase at roughly the same time. So no, billy000...the rate of increase we have seen is positively mundane relative to what the earth has seen.

You have been duped...and apparently aren't bright enough to look at the data and change that condition.

And talk about being lame...It hasn't gone un noticed that you have yet to provide a single piece of actual data to support your position...and again, don't seem to be bright enough to grasp what that might mean.

Lol what? Global temperature figures weren't on record until 1880. Since then, 2016 and 2017 have been the hottest years on record. Learn your facts.

Please note that the unadjusted data sets say your hottest years ever are all total horse shit.. And if we actually place them in context of hundreds of thousands of years, your hottest ever is shown total fraud and nothing but uneducated hype to create fear and panic. Below is our current interglacial period... Guess what, even in the current interglacial we have been far warmer than we are today..



Your 'hottest ever' crap is a big line of bull shit..

 

[SSDD]

Lol what? Global temperature figures weren't on record until 1880. Since then, 2016 and 2017 have been the hottest years on record. Learn your facts.

So you deny all climate data that doesn't support your belief and rather, prefer to look at a literal half an eye blink in geological time to determine what the climate on earth is like. Now isn't that interesting? That is like opening and shutting your eyes as fast as you can, one time and gathering what the next few years is going to be like for you from that single blink.

I understand perfectly why you wackos can't bear to look at the longer picture..when you do, your present position becomes laughable...the warming we have seen...the very slight bit of warming we have seen in the past 150 years is not even noteworthy...much less unprecedented in the rate of warming, or the amount...If I were an idiot and believed in man made global warming, I don't guess I would want to look at the bigger picture either...I might want to restrict myself to the shortest possible view to reassure myself and make sure that I don't actually have to use my brain and think about the climate question.

 

[SSDD]

Yes, climate research got fudged for personal gain. It doesn't negate thousands of other climate studies done over decades. Try to muster some basic critical thinking skills, will you?

Now that poses an interesting question...michael mann is on the verge of losing his court case and being found to have made fraudulent claims and faked data to support those claims. Consider for just a second if you can manage that much mental energy...how many papers over the past couple of decades have relied on the data in mann's hockeystick paper. Such a ruling would put serious doubts on that paper and in turn every paper that has used his data since.

Oh and some guy claimed the world was warmer during medieval times? Well that's just complete bullshit that isn't at all backed by data. You're just cherry picking random contrarian information and claiming the overwhelming evidence for climate change somehow doesn't matter. You come across very dumb doing this.

Of course it was warmer during the medieval period..and even warmer during the roman period, and even warmer during the minoan period and the temperatures are backed by dozens upon dozens of studies all showing the same thing from literally ever corner of the world.

Now if you are such a denier, that you reject accepted peer reviewed, published studies that don't support your beliefs on the climate based on a literal eye blink of time, then it is more than clear that you simply aren't bright enough to really engage in this conversation. You truly are an antiscoience cultist who is only interested in supporting his narrow view and has no interests at all in finding the truth. Congratulations...you are a fundamentalist.

 

[SSDD]

Your 'hottest ever' crap is a big line of bull shit..

Turns out that billy000 is a top shelf denier...he only accepts data that falls within a literal eyeblink of geological time and refuses to consider anything that doesn't support his faith. We have been talking to a genuine cultist. A fundamentalist of the church of AGW.

 

[matildaoxetto]

Yes, climate research got fudged for personal gain. It doesn't negate thousands of other climate studies done over decades. Try to muster some basic critical thinking skills, will you?

Now that poses an interesting question...michael mann is on the verge of losing his court case and being found to have made fraudulent claims and faked data to support those claims. Consider for just a second if you can manage that much mental energy...how many papers over the past couple of decades have relied on the data in mann's hockeystick paper. Such a ruling would put serious doubts on that paper and in turn every paper that has used his data since.

Oh and some guy claimed the world was warmer during medieval times? Well that's just complete bullshit that isn't at all backed by data. You're just cherry picking random contrarian information and claiming the overwhelming evidence for climate change somehow doesn't matter. You come across very dumb doing this.

Of course it was warmer during the medieval period..and even warmer during the roman period, and even warmer during the minoan period and the temperatures are backed by dozens upon dozens of studies all showing the same thing from literally ever corner of the world.

Now if you are such a denier, that you reject accepted peer reviewed, published studies that don't support your beliefs on the climate based on a literal eye blink of time, then it is more than clear that you simply aren't bright enough to really engage in this conversation. You truly are an antiscoience cultist who is only interested in supporting his narrow view and has no interests at all in finding the truth. Congratulations...you are a fundamentalist.

You're 100% right.

 

[skookerasbil]

Goofball progressives have been talking about the "denier" crap for over 10 years now. But.............to what effect? Nobody cares about the 97% consensus. Would love somebody to post up a single link showing us all where it is mattering in the real world?!

Time for Plan B assholes.......and come back and let us know when climate change actually becomes a topic in a presidential debate. Or when a green candidate actually wins a race in congress instead of getting their clock cleaned. Or when solar or wind power actually becomes something more than a fringe energy source.

Until then............nobody cares

 

[LuckyDuck]

They are in denial. They can't accept that human civilization is in its final decades. It's part of their brains. In fact, neuroscience has shown evidence that the rightwing brain is more susceptible to fear than leftwinger brains are. This would inevitably create denial as a defense mechanism.

Again, I stress that human civilization - not the human race altogether - is in serious jeopardy. The human race may have more time, but civilized society and basic government institutions are in danger of collapsing within the next 100 years. That isn't an exaggeration - there are just a variety of factors stacked against us.

The effects of rising global temperatures have disastrous effects. It affects the human food supply, disease, water supply and natural disasters. All of these factors also raise the probability of future large-scale human conflicts.

Human and animal life on this planet is ultimately doomed, but focusing legislation on mitigating the effects of climate change will help to prolong the human race's survival.

Billy000, if you can get hold of a copy of the New Scientist, February 10-16, 2018 issue, there's an article on page 10, titled, Modern society looks unworkable.
The study cited, showed that countries like the US, UK and Australia are basically, not sustainable due to resource drain, however, until such time as the resources become scarce, the people lived well. After that...well....not so well. Some nations like Malawi and Senegal didn't impact the planet negatively and were thus not a problem with the planet, though they reflected very poorly when it came to the social livability of its peoples. A few nations like Sri Lanka, Vietnam and Moldova performed well across the planets resources and social livability of its peoples, but they weren't perfect. None of the 151 nations studied did totally positive across the board. Interesting article.

 

[IsaacNewton]

They are in denial. They can't accept that human civilization is in its final decades. It's part of their brains. In fact, neuroscience has shown evidence that the rightwing brain is more susceptible to fear than leftwinger brains are. This would inevitably create denial as a defense mechanism.

Again, I stress that human civilization - not the human race altogether - is in serious jeopardy. The human race may have more time, but civilized society and basic government institutions are in danger of collapsing within the next 100 years. That isn't an exaggeration - there are just a variety of factors stacked against us.

The effects of rising global temperatures have disastrous effects. It affects the human food supply, disease, water supply and natural disasters. All of these factors also raise the probability of future large-scale human conflicts.

Human and animal life on this planet is ultimately doomed, but focusing legislation on mitigating the effects of climate change will help to prolong the human race's survival.

And the entire human race, 196 countries signed an agreement recognizing these very facts and that action is needed. Unfortunately for humanity, the most backward and easily manipulated minority of people lives in the US and got just enough votes to put an 8 year old into power who still wants to pretend it is 1856 and everything's fine and there is no need for adult action. So now the US and Nicaragua are against all the rest of humanity and are holding up needed immediate action on this.

Noam Chomsky was right when he said "the Republican party in the US is the most dangerous institution in history" to the human race.

 

[bripat9643]

They are in denial. They can't accept that human civilization is in its final decades. It's part of their brains. In fact, neuroscience has shown evidence that the rightwing brain is more susceptible to fear than leftwinger brains are. This would inevitably create denial as a defense mechanism.

Again, I stress that human civilization - not the human race altogether - is in serious jeopardy. The human race may have more time, but civilized society and basic government institutions are in danger of collapsing within the next 100 years. That isn't an exaggeration - there are just a variety of factors stacked against us.

The effects of rising global temperatures have disastrous effects. It affects the human food supply, disease, water supply and natural disasters. All of these factors also raise the probability of future large-scale human conflicts.

Human and animal life on this planet is ultimately doomed, but focusing legislation on mitigating the effects of climate change will help to prolong the human race's survival.

And the entire human race, 196 countries signed an agreement recognizing these very facts and that action is needed. Unfortunately for humanity, the most backward and easily manipulated minority of people lives in the US and got just enough votes to put an 8 year old into power who still wants to pretend it is 1856 and everything's fine and there is no need for adult action. So now the US and Nicaragua are against all the rest of humanity and are holding up needed immediate action on this.

Noam Chomsky was right when he said "the Republican party in the US is the most dangerous institution in history" to the human race.

No one is stopping those other countries from acting. What Trump stopped is their attempt to loot us.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

They are in denial. They can't accept that human civilization is in its final decades. It's part of their brains. In fact, neuroscience has shown evidence that the rightwing brain is more susceptible to fear than leftwinger brains are. This would inevitably create denial as a defense mechanism.

Again, I stress that human civilization - not the human race altogether - is in serious jeopardy. The human race may have more time, but civilized society and basic government institutions are in danger of collapsing within the next 100 years. That isn't an exaggeration - there are just a variety of factors stacked against us.

The effects of rising global temperatures have disastrous effects. It affects the human food supply, disease, water supply and natural disasters. All of these factors also raise the probability of future large-scale human conflicts.

Human and animal life on this planet is ultimately doomed, but focusing legislation on mitigating the effects of climate change will help to prolong the human race's survival.

Uh oh.....

Billy got in the schnapps again.

 

[SSDD]

They are in denial. They can't accept that human civilization is in its final decades. It's part of their brains. In fact, neuroscience has shown evidence that the rightwing brain is more susceptible to fear than leftwinger brains are. This would inevitably create denial as a defense mechanism.

Again, I stress that human civilization - not the human race altogether - is in serious jeopardy. The human race may have more time, but civilized society and basic government institutions are in danger of collapsing within the next 100 years. That isn't an exaggeration - there are just a variety of factors stacked against us.

The effects of rising global temperatures have disastrous effects. It affects the human food supply, disease, water supply and natural disasters. All of these factors also raise the probability of future large-scale human conflicts.

Human and animal life on this planet is ultimately doomed, but focusing legislation on mitigating the effects of climate change will help to prolong the human race's survival.

And the entire human race, 196 countries signed an agreement recognizing these very facts and that action is needed. Unfortunately for humanity, the most backward and easily manipulated minority of people lives in the US and got just enough votes to put an 8 year old into power who still wants to pretend it is 1856 and everything's fine and there is no need for adult action. So now the US and Nicaragua are against all the rest of humanity and are holding up needed immediate action on this.

Noam Chomsky was right when he said "the Republican party in the US is the most dangerous institution in history" to the human race.

Maybe you should delve into history a bit and see just how often the "consensus" turns out to the the easily manipulated ones...consensus is by definition group think...especially in science.

 

[cnelsen]

They are in denial. They can't accept that human civilization is in its final decades. It's part of their brains. In fact, neuroscience has shown evidence that the rightwing brain is more susceptible to fear than leftwinger brains are. This would inevitably create denial as a defense mechanism.

Again, I stress that human civilization - not the human race altogether - is in serious jeopardy. The human race may have more time, but civilized society and basic government institutions are in danger of collapsing within the next 100 years. That isn't an exaggeration - there are just a variety of factors stacked against us.

The effects of rising global temperatures have disastrous effects. It affects the human food supply, disease, water supply and natural disasters. All of these factors also raise the probability of future large-scale human conflicts.

Human and animal life on this planet is ultimately doomed, but focusing legislation on mitigating the effects of climate change will help to prolong the human race's survival.

Billy000, if you can get hold of a copy of the New Scientist, February 10-16, 2018 issue, there's an article on page 10, titled, Modern society looks unworkable.
The study cited, showed that countries like the US, UK and Australia are basically, not sustainable due to resource drain, however, until such time as the resources become scarce, the people lived well. After that...well....not so well. Some nations like Malawi and Senegal didn't impact the planet negatively and were thus not a problem with the planet, though they reflected very poorly when it came to the social livability of its peoples. A few nations like Sri Lanka, Vietnam and Moldova performed well across the planets resources and social livability of its peoples, but they weren't perfect. None of the 151 nations studied did totally positive across the board. Interesting article.

Bull. Hysterics have been screaming the sky is falling since Jesus was in diapers. Usually, the theatrics are only a way to make themselves seem more important than they really are. With the climate change crowd, it is a sneaky way to usurp power from local people and communities and pay a bunch of sophisticated nags a ton of money to fly around the world attending conferences in luxury resorts where they get laid, get hammered, and talk about how they are going to get our money into their hands.