Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I find it amusing that we're STILL debating the issue of whether Global Weirding is actually happening.
This proves to me the truth that the NAZIs so understood.
The BIG LIE works.
LOL. I'm not too sure you understood the post you quoted.I find it amusing that we're STILL debating the issue of whether Global Weirding is actually happening.
This proves to me the truth that the NAZIs so understood.
The BIG LIE works.
Don't worry, the deniers' lies will start to unravel. They always do. I have faith that science will get it right. They're AFRAID science will get it right. If that's "religion" on my part, so be it.
Yes, I've asked it and you have yet to answer it.Asked and answered.
Fellows, here is how it is. This game can be played by both parties. I think it high time that we look at the funding of such liars as Watts. And someone should go through all his e-mails back to the Arpnet.
And then there is the matter of Dr. Lindzen and the tobacco and energy company money. Same treatment for that bozo.
And we already have the letter written by the Royal Society to Exxon concerning the money they put out to lie about global warming.
Time to get aggressive with assholes. Including that twerp in Virginia. Seems that there is grounds for a harrassment suit there. As well as personal libel.
Fellows, here is how it is. This game can be played by both parties. I think it high time that we look at the funding of such liars as Watts. And someone should go through all his e-mails back to the Arpnet.
And then there is the matter of Dr. Lindzen and the tobacco and energy company money. Same treatment for that bozo.
And we already have the letter written by the Royal Society to Exxon concerning the money they put out to lie about global warming.
Time to get aggressive with assholes. Including that twerp in Virginia. Seems that there is grounds for a harrassment suit there. As well as personal libel.
Old Rocks- it is rather unseemly that you are using deflection distraction and ad homenem to avoid the issue that you brought up by starting this thread. The inquiry by Penn State did not address in a meaningful way any of the serious criticisms leveled against Mann. Why do you consider this an exoneration rather than a whitewash?
What a joke of an article. Since when is exposing lack of scientific integrity an attack on science? If there is no scientific integrity, there is no science.
The article is lame but leave it to dilettantes to think it has any merit.
What a joke of an article. Since when is exposing lack of scientific integrity an attack on science? If there is no scientific integrity, there is no science.
The article is lame but leave it to dilettantes to think it has any merit.
But so far the claim of lack of scientific integrity is only the opinion of people that didn't like him in the first place. That's hardly an unbiased sample. The people who would be expected to protect their institution from such charges, if at all true, exonerated him. It now appears that "Climategate" was nothing more than a hoax, ginned up over the misinterpretation of stolen private emails. If the skeptics are to be believed, they're going to have to come up with some actual evidence.
Yes, I've asked it and you have yet to answer it.Asked and answered.
Yes, I've asked it and you have yet to answer it.Asked and answered.
Oh stop playing games, old gal. Everyone here knows that you deny any reality that conflicts with your Conservative talking points. A partisan dingleberry incapable of entering into a rational debate is what you are. Completely evident to one and all on this board.
Problem is, this kettle isn't black.Yes, I've asked it and you have yet to answer it.
Oh stop playing games, old gal. Everyone here knows that you deny any reality that conflicts with your Conservative talking points. A partisan dingleberry incapable of entering into a rational debate is what you are. Completely evident to one and all on this board.
Yet again the pot calls the kettle.
Yes, I've asked it and you have yet to answer it.Asked and answered.
Oh stop playing games, old gal. Everyone here knows that you deny any reality that conflicts with your Conservative talking points. A partisan dingleberry incapable of entering into a rational debate is what you are. Completely evident to one and all on this board.
Fellows, here is how it is. This game can be played by both parties. I think it high time that we look at the funding of such liars as Watts. And someone should go through all his e-mails back to the Arpnet.
And then there is the matter of Dr. Lindzen and the tobacco and energy company money. Same treatment for that bozo.
And we already have the letter written by the Royal Society to Exxon concerning the money they put out to lie about global warming.
Time to get aggressive with assholes. Including that twerp in Virginia. Seems that there is grounds for a harrassment suit there. As well as personal libel.
Old Rocks- it is rather unseemly that you are using deflection distraction and ad homenem to avoid the issue that you brought up by starting this thread. The inquiry by Penn State did not address in a meaningful way any of the serious criticisms leveled against Mann. Why do you consider this an exoneration rather than a whitewash?
Because the extreme right's attack on Mann is the real distraction.
The real question is, what will be the effect on the earth's climate of doubling atmospheric CO2?
the effect will be you'll have to put your head back up that sheep's asshole.Fellows, here is how it is. This game can be played by both parties. I think it high time that we look at the funding of such liars as Watts. And someone should go through all his e-mails back to the Arpnet.
And then there is the matter of Dr. Lindzen and the tobacco and energy company money. Same treatment for that bozo.
And we already have the letter written by the Royal Society to Exxon concerning the money they put out to lie about global warming.
Time to get aggressive with assholes. Including that twerp in Virginia. Seems that there is grounds for a harrassment suit there. As well as personal libel.
Old Rocks- it is rather unseemly that you are using deflection distraction and ad homenem to avoid the issue that you brought up by starting this thread. The inquiry by Penn State did not address in a meaningful way any of the serious criticisms leveled against Mann. Why do you consider this an exoneration rather than a whitewash?
Because the extreme right's attack on Mann is the real distraction.
The real question is, what will be the effect on the earth's climate of doubling atmospheric CO2?
Michael E. Mann - Get the anti-science bent out of politics
As a scientist, I shouldn't have a stake in the upcoming midterm elections, but unfortunately, it seems that I -- and indeed all my fellow climate scientists -- do.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has threatened that, if he becomes chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, he will launch what would be a hostile investigation of climate science. The focus would be on e-mails stolen from scientists at the University of East Anglia in Britain last fall that climate-change deniers have falsely claimed demonstrate wrongdoing by scientists, including me. Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) may do the same if he takes over a committee on climate change and energy security.
My employer, Penn State University, exonerated me after a thorough investigation of my e-mails in the East Anglia archive. Five independent investigations in Britain and the United States, and a thorough recent review by the Environmental Protection Agency, also have cleared the scientists of accusations of impropriety.
Nonetheless, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is investigating my previous employer, the University of Virginia, based on the stolen e-mails. A judge rejected his initial subpoena, finding that Cuccinelli had failed to provide objective evidence of wrongdoing. Undeterred, Cuccinelli appealed the decision to the Virginia Supreme Court and this week issued a new civil subpoena.
What could Issa, Sensenbrenner and Cuccinelli possibly think they might uncover now, a year after the e-mails were published?
The truth is that they don't expect to uncover anything. Instead, they want to continue a 20-year assault on climate research, questioning basic science and promoting doubt where there is none.
Old Rocks- it is rather unseemly that you are using deflection distraction and ad homenem to avoid the issue that you brought up by starting this thread. The inquiry by Penn State did not address in a meaningful way any of the serious criticisms leveled against Mann. Why do you consider this an exoneration rather than a whitewash?
Because the extreme right's attack on Mann is the real distraction.
The real question is, what will be the effect on the earth's climate of doubling atmospheric CO2?
It's not just the 'extreme right' who attacks Mann. It's anyone who values integrity, scientific or otherwise.