Bleipriester
Freedom!
You primitive Zion parrot have no idea what you are talking about. The "Jewish neighborhoods", the illegal armed Zionist settlers, with little to no Jewish knowledge and culture are not supported by international law. Also, don´t try to make this a religious matter, it is entirely political.You say this as if the law of the jungle applies to the grounds the settlers occupy. But it doesn´t. Your foreign US neighborhoods exist with the agreement of the government.This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. ...
You say this with no consideration of sovereignty or how sovereignty over soil is transferred. The act of any number of people immigrating to a certain square of soil does not transfer sovereignty, of itself, nor does it meet the legal standards of "occupation". (Just think of large neighborhoods in the US composed of groups of Koreans, Japanese, Italians, Irish, etc.)
It does seem apparent to me that the meaning of the word "settler" has taken on a new connotation due to its association with Jewish people moving to Israel and the territories in dispute. That connotation has certainly taken on a negative meaning.
And the Jewish neighbourhoods exist with the full weight of international law supporting and defending them. Or do you believe that international law should only work in islams favour ?