Asian Americans are wealthier than white people...that would be impossible if America was racist

[Spare_change]

Second, people of any race who work full time, are married, and have high school diplomas tend not to be poor, meaning that poverty is a function of one’s choice not to do these things.

and because black married couples have a lower poverty rate than white single mothers, “life decisions” are what creates poverty.

the disproportionately black population in America’s prisons say nothing about racism, because black people simply commit more crimes, and if you don’t commit a crime, you’re not going to be arrested for it because the police are not going around arresting black people for the fun of it.

I always find it funny that people who argue that Asians are doing great are never Asians themselves

Why is that ?

Asians wealthier than whites ?

Not really

When you look at the facts

Median family income in 2014:

• $61,000 Asian American
• $52,500 white
• $38,000 Latino
• $35,300 black
• $33,240 Native American

Asian come on top in median family income but when you change it to personal income

You get:

• $24,000 whites
• $23,000
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American
• $19,000
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian Americans come out on top of whites in median family income only because Asian families have by and large more people working. So this was picked because it supports white ppls stereotype about Asians as successful, which in turn makes it seem like American society is not racist.

And let's break it down even more by nationality:

• $26,000 Japanese, Asian Indians
• $25,000
• $24,000 whites
• $23,000 Filipinos
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American, Chinese
• $19,000 Pacific Islanders
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks, Koreans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian American covers too broader range.

Most who fled Indo-China after the Vietnam War and came to America with next to nothing are still at the bottom, making less than blacks on average. Even Korean Americans, despite their supposedly high IQs, have not clearly passed blacks, much less whites: they are the same as blacks in terms of median personal income ($16,300) and rate of home ownership

Where I got my data from

Actually, if you read the statistics, what they say is that Asian Americans work harder, longer hours, and are more committed to economic improvement than other races.

I suggest you take a look at the GROWTH curves and ask why the Asian American curve increases, while whites remain static, and blacks actually regress. (I'll give you a hint - look at their education curves, as well. They directly parallel the growth curves)

May have something to do with their propensity to cheat on tests.

How Sophisticated Test Scams From China Are Making Their Way Into the U.S.

Oh yeah ... that's it. That's definitely it.

Just keep deluding yourself.

 

[Asclepias]

Second, people of any race who work full time, are married, and have high school diplomas tend not to be poor, meaning that poverty is a function of one’s choice not to do these things.

and because black married couples have a lower poverty rate than white single mothers, “life decisions” are what creates poverty.

the disproportionately black population in America’s prisons say nothing about racism, because black people simply commit more crimes, and if you don’t commit a crime, you’re not going to be arrested for it because the police are not going around arresting black people for the fun of it.

I always find it funny that people who argue that Asians are doing great are never Asians themselves

Why is that ?

Asians wealthier than whites ?

Not really

When you look at the facts

Median family income in 2014:

• $61,000 Asian American
• $52,500 white
• $38,000 Latino
• $35,300 black
• $33,240 Native American

Asian come on top in median family income but when you change it to personal income

You get:

• $24,000 whites
• $23,000
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American
• $19,000
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian Americans come out on top of whites in median family income only because Asian families have by and large more people working. So this was picked because it supports white ppls stereotype about Asians as successful, which in turn makes it seem like American society is not racist.

And let's break it down even more by nationality:

• $26,000 Japanese, Asian Indians
• $25,000
• $24,000 whites
• $23,000 Filipinos
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American, Chinese
• $19,000 Pacific Islanders
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks, Koreans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian American covers too broader range.

Most who fled Indo-China after the Vietnam War and came to America with next to nothing are still at the bottom, making less than blacks on average. Even Korean Americans, despite their supposedly high IQs, have not clearly passed blacks, much less whites: they are the same as blacks in terms of median personal income ($16,300) and rate of home ownership

Where I got my data from

Actually, if you read the statistics, what they say is that Asian Americans work harder, longer hours, and are more committed to economic improvement than other races.

I suggest you take a look at the GROWTH curves and ask why the Asian American curve increases, while whites remain static, and blacks actually regress. (I'll give you a hint - look at their education curves, as well. They directly parallel the growth curves)

May have something to do with their propensity to cheat on tests.

How Sophisticated Test Scams From China Are Making Their Way Into the U.S.

Oh yeah ... that's it. That's definitely it.

Just keep deluding yourself.

You have to cheat to get ahead. Whites legislated themselves 400 yrs of affirmative action then fell asleep at the wheel. Asians swooped in and outcheated them.

 

[Spare_change]

Second, people of any race who work full time, are married, and have high school diplomas tend not to be poor, meaning that poverty is a function of one’s choice not to do these things.

and because black married couples have a lower poverty rate than white single mothers, “life decisions” are what creates poverty.

the disproportionately black population in America’s prisons say nothing about racism, because black people simply commit more crimes, and if you don’t commit a crime, you’re not going to be arrested for it because the police are not going around arresting black people for the fun of it.

I always find it funny that people who argue that Asians are doing great are never Asians themselves

Why is that ?

Asians wealthier than whites ?

Not really

When you look at the facts

Median family income in 2014:

• $61,000 Asian American
• $52,500 white
• $38,000 Latino
• $35,300 black
• $33,240 Native American

Asian come on top in median family income but when you change it to personal income

You get:

• $24,000 whites
• $23,000
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American
• $19,000
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian Americans come out on top of whites in median family income only because Asian families have by and large more people working. So this was picked because it supports white ppls stereotype about Asians as successful, which in turn makes it seem like American society is not racist.

And let's break it down even more by nationality:

• $26,000 Japanese, Asian Indians
• $25,000
• $24,000 whites
• $23,000 Filipinos
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American, Chinese
• $19,000 Pacific Islanders
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks, Koreans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian American covers too broader range.

Most who fled Indo-China after the Vietnam War and came to America with next to nothing are still at the bottom, making less than blacks on average. Even Korean Americans, despite their supposedly high IQs, have not clearly passed blacks, much less whites: they are the same as blacks in terms of median personal income ($16,300) and rate of home ownership

Where I got my data from

Actually, if you read the statistics, what they say is that Asian Americans work harder, longer hours, and are more committed to economic improvement than other races.

I suggest you take a look at the GROWTH curves and ask why the Asian American curve increases, while whites remain static, and blacks actually regress. (I'll give you a hint - look at their education curves, as well. They directly parallel the growth curves)

May have something to do with their propensity to cheat on tests.

How Sophisticated Test Scams From China Are Making Their Way Into the U.S.

Oh yeah ... that's it. That's definitely it.

Just keep deluding yourself.

You have to cheat to get ahead. Whites legislated themselves 400 yrs of affirmative action then fell asleep at the wheel. Asians swooped in and outcheated them.

Oh yeah ... that's it. That's definitely it.

Just keep deluding yourself.

 

[Asclepias]

I always find it funny that people who argue that Asians are doing great are never Asians themselves

Why is that ?

Asians wealthier than whites ?

Not really

When you look at the facts

Median family income in 2014:

• $61,000 Asian American
• $52,500 white
• $38,000 Latino
• $35,300 black
• $33,240 Native American

Asian come on top in median family income but when you change it to personal income

You get:

• $24,000 whites
• $23,000
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American
• $19,000
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian Americans come out on top of whites in median family income only because Asian families have by and large more people working. So this was picked because it supports white ppls stereotype about Asians as successful, which in turn makes it seem like American society is not racist.

And let's break it down even more by nationality:

• $26,000 Japanese, Asian Indians
• $25,000
• $24,000 whites
• $23,000 Filipinos
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American, Chinese
• $19,000 Pacific Islanders
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks, Koreans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian American covers too broader range.

Most who fled Indo-China after the Vietnam War and came to America with next to nothing are still at the bottom, making less than blacks on average. Even Korean Americans, despite their supposedly high IQs, have not clearly passed blacks, much less whites: they are the same as blacks in terms of median personal income ($16,300) and rate of home ownership

Where I got my data from

Actually, if you read the statistics, what they say is that Asian Americans work harder, longer hours, and are more committed to economic improvement than other races.

I suggest you take a look at the GROWTH curves and ask why the Asian American curve increases, while whites remain static, and blacks actually regress. (I'll give you a hint - look at their education curves, as well. They directly parallel the growth curves)

May have something to do with their propensity to cheat on tests.

How Sophisticated Test Scams From China Are Making Their Way Into the U.S.

Oh yeah ... that's it. That's definitely it.

Just keep deluding yourself.

You have to cheat to get ahead. Whites legislated themselves 400 yrs of affirmative action then fell asleep at the wheel. Asians swooped in and outcheated them.

Oh yeah ... that's it. That's definitely it.

Just keep deluding yourself.

Delude myself? I've never told myself white boys like you know what youre talking about. Why would I do something stupid like that?

 

[IM2]

Second, people of any race who work full time, are married, and have high school diplomas tend not to be poor, meaning that poverty is a function of one’s choice not to do these things.

and because black married couples have a lower poverty rate than white single mothers, “life decisions” are what creates poverty.

the disproportionately black population in America’s prisons say nothing about racism, because black people simply commit more crimes, and if you don’t commit a crime, you’re not going to be arrested for it because the police are not going around arresting black people for the fun of it.

I always find it funny that people who argue that Asians are doing great are never Asians themselves

Why is that ?

Asians wealthier than whites ?

Not really

When you look at the facts

Median family income in 2014:

• $61,000 Asian American
• $52,500 white
• $38,000 Latino
• $35,300 black
• $33,240 Native American

Asian come on top in median family income but when you change it to personal income

You get:

• $24,000 whites
• $23,000
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American
• $19,000
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian Americans come out on top of whites in median family income only because Asian families have by and large more people working. So this was picked because it supports white ppls stereotype about Asians as successful, which in turn makes it seem like American society is not racist.

And let's break it down even more by nationality:

• $26,000 Japanese, Asian Indians
• $25,000
• $24,000 whites
• $23,000 Filipinos
• $22,000
• $21,000
• $20,000 Asian American, Chinese
• $19,000 Pacific Islanders
• $18,000
• $17,000
• $16,000 blacks, Koreans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians
• $15,000 Native Americans
• $14,000 Latinos

Asian American covers too broader range.

Most who fled Indo-China after the Vietnam War and came to America with next to nothing are still at the bottom, making less than blacks on average. Even Korean Americans, despite their supposedly high IQs, have not clearly passed blacks, much less whites: they are the same as blacks in terms of median personal income ($16,300) and rate of home ownership

Where I got my data from

Actually, if you read the statistics, what they say is that Asian Americans work harder, longer hours, and are more committed to economic improvement than other races.

I suggest you take a look at the GROWTH curves and ask why the Asian American curve increases, while whites remain static, and blacks actually regress. (I'll give you a hint - look at their education curves, as well. They directly parallel the growth curves)

Actually your statistics are a bunch of garbage..

'Model Minority' Myth Again Used As A Racial Wedge Between Asians And Blacks

A piece from New York Magazine's Andrew Sullivan over the weekend ended with an old, well-worn trope: Asian-Americans, with their "solid two-parent family structures," are a shining example of how to overcome discrimination. An essay that began by imagining why Democrats feel sorry for Hillary Clinton — and then detoured to President Trump's policies — drifted to this troubling ending:

"Today, Asian-Americans are among the most prosperous, well-educated, and successful ethnic groups in America. What gives? It couldn't possibly be that they maintained solid two-parent family structures, had social networks that looked after one another, placed enormous emphasis on education and hard work, and thereby turned false, negative stereotypes into true, positive ones, could it? It couldn't be that all whites are not racists or that the American dream still lives?"

Sullivan's piece, rife with generalizations about a group as vastly diverse as Asian-Americans, rightfully raised hackles. Not only inaccurate, his piece spreads the idea that Asian-Americans as a group are monolithic, even though parsing data by ethnicity reveals a host of disparities; for example, Bhutanese-Americans have far higher rates of poverty than other Asian populations, like Japanese-Americans. And at the root of Sullivan's pernicious argument is the idea that black failure and Asian success cannot be explained by inequities and racism, and that they are one and the same; this allows a segment of white America to avoid any responsibility for addressing racism or the damage it continues to inflict.

'Model Minority' Myth Again Used As A Racial Wedge Between Asians And Blacks

Model Minority” Seems Like a Compliment, but It Does Great Harm

For labels that sound so promising in tone, the “model minority” and “Asian advantage” stereotypes do nothing but render discrimination against Asian-Americans invisible.

Arguments of Asian cultural superiority often try to validate the model minority label: The success of Asian-Americans in the United States is “a tribute to hard work, strong families and passion for education.” Positive stereotypes about Asian-Americans are frequently seen as more beneficial than detrimental to the student psyche, in spite of research that these stereotypes harm Asian-American students' mental health and well-being.

The most poignant consequence of the model minority label is its failure to acknowledge socioeconomic and education disparities among the diverse range of communities categorized as Asian-American. Not all ethnic communities under the Asian-American umbrella are advantaged. Southeast Asian-Americans drop out of high school at an alarming rate; nearly 40 percent of Hmong-Americans, 38 percent of Laotian-Americans, and 35 percent of Cambodian-Americans do not finish high school. These Asian-American subgroups, along with Vietnamese-Americans, earn below the national average. Sweeping generalizations of Asian-Americans as the “privileged” and “successful” minority cannot replace unnerving disaggregated data that bring truth to the inequalities that many Asian-Americans face daily.

"Model Minority" Seems Like a Compliment, but It Does Great Harm - NYTimes.com
.

 

[Paul Essien]

Because there's nothing inherently "shitty" that makes the land in Africa worthless. It's the people (leaders especially) that make those countries shitty. Those people being negroes now.

OK. So now your saying the land is not shitty. The people are. So all African people are shitty ? OK. What leaders of what countries in Africa are shitty ? And why are the people in Africa are shitty and what countries in Africa have the shittiest people and why ?

Because it's better here. Now, if I lived in Zimbabwe or some other negro shithole, then I certainly would go there at the very least.

Your people are suffering over there. So why don't you go and help them ? Don't you want to support your people ?

I don't talk tough, I talk intelligently. Obviously, you and your brethren don't understand that so it would be a massive waste of my time.

Well if you don't talk tough then what's the problem ? Just step to black man and say what you on here "negro shit-hole" etc and all that gangster talk you do. Why don't you do that to a black man's face ? Or are you scared of black men ?

 

[Paul Essien]

If you weren't so stupid you'd realize my superior intellect is what keeps me from wasting time chatting with dumb animals on the street.

You don't believe you are superior black men and you know it.

 

[Correll]

If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

Jim crow didn't end...it just evolved in to James Crow esquire...

Jim Crow did end. YOur denial of reality is noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


America was 90% white in 1950.



If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

When did Jim Crow end? Surely you can point to some notable event that signaled the end of it. And if we are going to have an intelligent discussion on this matter we need to agree on the social markers that show whether or not changes have been broad enough to qualify as evidence one way or the other.

Thus far your only proof has been to point to the year 1950 with some bizarre notion that Caucasian population size in that year had something to do with Jim Crow. I can't see the nexus...

Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia



"Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. Enacted by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures in the late 19th century after the Reconstruction period, these laws continued to be enforced until 1965. "


"These Jim Crow laws revived principles of the 1865 and 1866 Black Codes, which had previously restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans. Segregation of public (state-sponsored) schools was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. In some states it took years to implement this decision. Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but years of action and court challenges have been needed to unravel the many means of institutional discrimination."




YOur pretense that you are so stupid that you didn't understand my point about the White Majority is dismissed.


You might be stupid, but you are not THAT stupid.




SOcial markers? LOL!! The Jim Crow laws were a collection of laws, that were repealed and/or no longer enforced.

 

[rightwinger]

Asian Americans prove the dictum that hard work and talent ultimately win out

They are excellent students who graduate from top universities at the top of their class. In the workplace, they perform excellently and earn high incomes

But they also demonstrate racist America. These top students and hard workers are underrepresented in top management and CEO positions. Those prime positions are still reserved for white males who graduated lower in their class

 

[IM2]

Asian Americans prove the dictum that hard work and talent ultimately win out

They are excellent students who graduate from top universities at the top of their class. In the workplace, they perform excellently and earn high incomes

But they also demonstrate racist America. These top students and hard workers are underrepresented in top management and CEO positions. Those prime positions are still reserved for white males who graduated lower in their class

The only thing I will disagree with is that all of those that whites consider Asian do not prove this dictum.

 

[IM2]

If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

Jim crow didn't end...it just evolved in to James Crow esquire...

Jim Crow did end. YOur denial of reality is noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


America was 90% white in 1950.



If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

When did Jim Crow end? Surely you can point to some notable event that signaled the end of it. And if we are going to have an intelligent discussion on this matter we need to agree on the social markers that show whether or not changes have been broad enough to qualify as evidence one way or the other.

Thus far your only proof has been to point to the year 1950 with some bizarre notion that Caucasian population size in that year had something to do with Jim Crow. I can't see the nexus...

Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia



"Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. Enacted by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures in the late 19th century after the Reconstruction period, these laws continued to be enforced until 1965. "


"These Jim Crow laws revived principles of the 1865 and 1866 Black Codes, which had previously restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans. Segregation of public (state-sponsored) schools was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. In some states it took years to implement this decision. Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but years of action and court challenges have been needed to unravel the many means of institutional discrimination."




YOur pretense that you are so stupid that you didn't understand my point about the White Majority is dismissed.


You might be stupid, but you are not THAT stupid.




SOcial markers? LOL!! The Jim Crow laws were a collection of laws, that were repealed and/or no longer enforced.

Laws that are not followed do not count.

 

[JQPublic1]

If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

Jim crow didn't end...it just evolved in to James Crow esquire...

Jim Crow did end. YOur denial of reality is noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


America was 90% white in 1950.



If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

When did Jim Crow end? Surely you can point to some notable event that signaled the end of it. And if we are going to have an intelligent discussion on this matter we need to agree on the social markers that show whether or not changes have been broad enough to qualify as evidence one way or the other.

Thus far your only proof has been to point to the year 1950 with some bizarre notion that Caucasian population size in that year had something to do with Jim Crow. I can't see the nexus...

Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia



"Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. Enacted by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures in the late 19th century after the Reconstruction period, these laws continued to be enforced until 1965. "


"These Jim Crow laws revived principles of the 1865 and 1866 Black Codes, which had previously restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans. Segregation of public (state-sponsored) schools was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. In some states it took years to implement this decision. Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but years of action and court challenges have been needed to unravel the many means of institutional discrimination."




YOur pretense that you are so stupid that you didn't understand my point about the White Majority is dismissed.


You might be stupid, but you are not THAT stupid.




SOcial markers? LOL!! The Jim Crow laws were a collection of laws, that were repealed and/or no longer enforced.

Know what your problem is? Idiots like you just don't pay close enough attention to detail.
Just because Jim Crow laws are no longer enforced doesn't mean Jim Crow ended. That's like saying the Warren Court decision in 1954 ended segregation at the moment of the decision when it didn't. Although the Separate but Equal doctrine was no longer the law of the land It took years of marching, more Anti- segregation legislation and bloodshed before some modicum of Integration was implemented universally in the USA.

Don't confuse enforcement of Jim Crow Laws with Jim Crow effects. The effects of Jim Crow still haunts us in many forms.
1. Cross check disenfranchised millions of American minority voters just because they shared the same ethnic sounding names.

2. Gerrymandering neutralizes the voting power of districts populated by minorities.

Spoiler

Finally, fourteen States consider communities ofshared interests in redistricting. See All AboutRedistricting. These can include “social, cultural,racial, ethnic, and economic interests common to the
population of the area, which are probable subjects of
legislation.” Id. (citing Kansas guidelines).
2. Within these broad constraints and guidelines,
States are free to draw congressional district lines as
they see fit. Unfortunately, this freedom
Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964) (applying the principle to
state legislatures); Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368
(1963) (statewide offices).
The second federal criterion, the Voting Rights Act,
52 U.S.C. § 10301, et seq.7
, builds on the first: it
applies the Equal Protection Clause’s guarantee to
provide enhanced protection against the dilution of
minority votes. Section 2 of the Act prohibits, among
other things, any measure that “results in a denial or
abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United
States to vote on account of race or color.” 52 U.S.C.
§ 10301(a). The Act’s practical effect on redistricting
is a controversial and heavily litigated matter. See,
e.g., LULAC; Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996);
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993). But it means at
least that States may not draw districts in such a
way that minorities “have less opportunity than
other members of the electorate to participate in the
political process and to elect representatives of their
choice.” 52 U.S.C. § 10301(b); see Abrams v. John-
son, 521 U.S. 74, 90-91 (1997)
leaves
ample opportunity for what Justice Fortas called
“the deliberate and arbitrary distortion of district
boundaries and populations for partisan or personal
political purposes.” Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S.
526, 538 (1969) (Fortas, J., concurring).

3. The Ferguson Effect: A scathing DOJ report summed up the racism and extortion perpetrated upon black citizens of that town by the all Caucasian city government. Do i have to convince anyone that the Ferguson effect is still a way of life in many states.

My point? By any other name Jim Crow is still Jim Crow...AND the cusory removal of JC laws from the books has NOT removed it from the hearts and minds of Cauc racists

 

[Paul Essien]

None of that actually follows from the point of the op. The point was about American society being more open to non whites than you lefties give it credit for.
The does not justify any of the silly claims you make above.

For those who don't know when white supremacists say "Lefties" or "Liberals" what they mean is n.i.gger lovers. Only this time Correll is using the term that other white supremacists use to shame other whites for not being racist enough. But this time he's using the term that's normally reserved for other whites on to a black man ?

Even when you look at Asians (who white supremacist love to big up & not all of them are academically successfull, see the hmongs, P-I etc) they maybe are on average better educated than their whites due to cultural factors. But in America this doesn’t translate into greater financial success nor job security (as I have shown).

This is evident in the Ivy League’s admissions.

They (white supremacist) reject Asian applicants with higher GPAs and SATs than white students because they do not want more than 15% of the student body to be Asian. They apply these stereotypes because they do not want a c.h.i.n.k.s and g.o.oks making big bucks on Wall Street. They want a white boy to make big bucks on Wall Street, because of course, only white men are suitable for any big job. Right ?

Even the over 100 Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) dedicated to the advancement of education for blacks. However of course white supremacy affects them due to allocation of funding and resources that generally favor historically white universities like the Ivy League.

Not to mention that African Americans tend to be in the poorest areas of America were resources, teachers and local area are usually substandard. But then whites supremacists say blacks are stupid. Well why go to such efforts to fk shit up ? I mean were just gonna mess up everything. Right ?

White social domination makes sure white schools out compete with black schools.

And even if black people do get the qualification. You really think that those white owned corps in silicon valley and Wall Street would gladly allow truck loads of black people in ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Also as has been mentioned by IM2 or it could have been Asclepias (I'm not sure) Nigerian kids are out perform everyone in the USA and Canada but white privilege allows others to be more forgiving to white children who aren’t that serious about education and who make lots of mistakes. (Doing drugs and not getting caught, this happens a LOT. And slacking off a bit)

The lesson to take away from American education is that if you are white, you will get your due reward, and then some. If you are nonwhite, plan on working harder to get the same reward, if any at all.

Whites do look down on stupid whites, and criminal whites and ill mannered whites.

Yup and you're all three.

Donald Trump and other rich whites don't give a fk about you. What ? You think you're on same team as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett fool ?

Let’s take the ultimate computer nerd. Mark Zuckerberg (Founder or Facebook)

Do you really think he got to where because of intelligence and hard work ?

He attended two of the most expensive and prestigious schools in the USA (Harvard, Phillips Exeter Academy). His success was due to his parents bank account and a bit a luck but had little to do with his intelligence and hard work.

It’s that simple. Everyone from Bill Gates to Warren Buffett needed a substantial amount of money to start up their companies.

Take the average drug dealer born in the ghetto and put them into an upper middle class family all of the sudden they’ll become a fortune five hundred CEO.

The same type of person that has the personality and skills to run a criminal entrepreneurship can easily run a legal one, but many will never have the opportunity that will allow them to earn the credentials necessary to do so.

YOu've been allowed to compete in all fields for generations.
The results are mixed.

Does racism exist ?

It was the vastly white voters and politicians that decided, time and time again, to support civil rights for non whites.

You are just repeating what you have already stated. So I'll post a link to the reply I stated

This nation was 90% white in 1950.

And this is the root of white racism. White genetic survival. Yeah whites will become half or roughly maybe 50% of the nation’s population by the latter part of the this century.

But the idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture and white people will be deculturated even when they are the norm.

White people will STILL be the largest single group BY FAR of any group in the United States.

This idea that whites can’t hang on at 50% when other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated

The idea that whites can’t do that at 50%, I mean, you must think white people are an incredibly weak-willed, or genetically defective, culturally retarded group of people if you think white people can’t maintain their own influence at 50%.

If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

The problems facing black people in America are socially engineered by the system. The system is made by white supremacists for white people interest only.

All white people understand this. That’s why they get hostile when black ppl speak about this.

That’s why in Arizona whites overwhelmingly supported that resolution that banned ethnic studies for black children.

All whites, no matter how ordinary, cheerful or inoffensive they appear to be are extremely RACE-CONSCIOUS, and have a ZERO SUM GAME PREDATORY mindset whenever blacks are concerned.

I never expect anything good coming from a system dominated by white supremacists simply because educated black people = more competitors against their own white children.

So it’s never in white supremacists interest to provide better education to black children.

 

[JQPublic1]

Also as has been mentioned by IM2 or it could have been Asclepias (I'm not sure) Nigerian kids are out perform everyone

it was just little ol me'...

 

[Paul Essien]

it was just little ol me'...

OK. My bad. I knew it was you or IM2 or Asclepias that I read about the Nigerian kids success in education

 

[Asclepias]

Asian Americans prove the dictum that hard work and talent ultimately win out

They are excellent students who graduate from top universities at the top of their class. In the workplace, they perform excellently and earn high incomes

But they also demonstrate racist America. These top students and hard workers are underrepresented in top management and CEO positions. Those prime positions are still reserved for white males who graduated lower in their class

Its like I said. Asians are propped up as the model minority so whites can pretend they arent racist. The real test however is the lack of Asians in the positions of leadership.

 

[rightwinger]

Asian Americans prove the dictum that hard work and talent ultimately win out

They are excellent students who graduate from top universities at the top of their class. In the workplace, they perform excellently and earn high incomes

But they also demonstrate racist America. These top students and hard workers are underrepresented in top management and CEO positions. Those prime positions are still reserved for white males who graduated lower in their class

Its like I said. Asians are propped up as the model minority so whites can pretend they arent racist. The real test however is the lack of Asians in the positions of leadership.

Asians rise quickly when they remain in working level and middle management positions

But when it comes to filling top executive slots, they are viewed as not having the "right stuff" and are bypassed by white males

Japanese, S Korean and Chinese corporations all have Asians as top executives and CEOs. These companies routinely outperform American companies. Those CEOs are also paid significantly less than American CEOs

 

[Correll]

If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

Jim crow didn't end...it just evolved in to James Crow esquire...

Jim Crow did end. YOur denial of reality is noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


America was 90% white in 1950.



If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

When did Jim Crow end? Surely you can point to some notable event that signaled the end of it. And if we are going to have an intelligent discussion on this matter we need to agree on the social markers that show whether or not changes have been broad enough to qualify as evidence one way or the other.

Thus far your only proof has been to point to the year 1950 with some bizarre notion that Caucasian population size in that year had something to do with Jim Crow. I can't see the nexus...

Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia



"Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. Enacted by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures in the late 19th century after the Reconstruction period, these laws continued to be enforced until 1965. "


"These Jim Crow laws revived principles of the 1865 and 1866 Black Codes, which had previously restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans. Segregation of public (state-sponsored) schools was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. In some states it took years to implement this decision. Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but years of action and court challenges have been needed to unravel the many means of institutional discrimination."




YOur pretense that you are so stupid that you didn't understand my point about the White Majority is dismissed.


You might be stupid, but you are not THAT stupid.




SOcial markers? LOL!! The Jim Crow laws were a collection of laws, that were repealed and/or no longer enforced.

Know what your problem is? Idiots like you just don't pay close enough attention to detail.
Just because Jim Crow laws are no longer enforced doesn't mean Jim Crow ended. That's like saying the Warren Court decision in 1954 ended segregation at the moment of the decision when it didn't. Although the Separate but Equal doctrine was no longer the law of the land It took years of marching, more Anti- segregation legislation and bloodshed before some modicum of Integration was implemented universally in the USA.

Don't confuse enforcement of Jim Crow Laws with Jim Crow effects. The effects of Jim Crow still haunts us in many forms.
1. Cross check disenfranchised millions of American minority voters just because they shared the same ethnic sounding names.

2. Gerrymandering neutralizes the voting power of districts populated by minorities.

Spoiler

Finally, fourteen States consider communities ofshared interests in redistricting. See All AboutRedistricting. These can include “social, cultural,racial, ethnic, and economic interests common to the
population of the area, which are probable subjects of
legislation.” Id. (citing Kansas guidelines).
2. Within these broad constraints and guidelines,
States are free to draw congressional district lines as
they see fit. Unfortunately, this freedom
Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964) (applying the principle to
state legislatures); Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368
(1963) (statewide offices).
The second federal criterion, the Voting Rights Act,
52 U.S.C. § 10301, et seq.7
, builds on the first: it
applies the Equal Protection Clause’s guarantee to
provide enhanced protection against the dilution of
minority votes. Section 2 of the Act prohibits, among
other things, any measure that “results in a denial or
abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United
States to vote on account of race or color.” 52 U.S.C.
§ 10301(a). The Act’s practical effect on redistricting
is a controversial and heavily litigated matter. See,
e.g., LULAC; Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996);
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993). But it means at
least that States may not draw districts in such a
way that minorities “have less opportunity than
other members of the electorate to participate in the
political process and to elect representatives of their
choice.” 52 U.S.C. § 10301(b); see Abrams v. John-
son, 521 U.S. 74, 90-91 (1997)
leaves
ample opportunity for what Justice Fortas called
“the deliberate and arbitrary distortion of district
boundaries and populations for partisan or personal
political purposes.” Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S.
526, 538 (1969) (Fortas, J., concurring).

3. The Ferguson Effect: A scathing DOJ report summed up the racism and extortion perpetrated upon black citizens of that town by the all Caucasian city government. Do i have to convince anyone that the Ferguson effect is still a way of life in many states.

My point? By any other name Jim Crow is still Jim Crow...AND the cusory removal of JC laws from the books has NOT removed it from the hearts and minds of Cauc racists

Jim Crow laws were ruled against back in 60s. Sure it took some time to actually enforce the decision. Nixon did a lot of the desegregation of schools, for example.


BUt that was done.


Today, the national policy is a witch hunt against discrimination against blacks. WHole industries of lawyers and government officials sit around all day waiting for an opportunity to justify their existence and paychecks by fucking some poor schmuck who committed the crime of being accused.

 

[Correll]

None of that actually follows from the point of the op. The point was about American society being more open to non whites than you lefties give it credit for.
The does not justify any of the silly claims you make above.

For those who don't know when white supremacists say "Lefties" or "Liberals" what they mean is n.i.gger lovers. Only this time Correll is using the term that other white supremacists use to shame other whites for not being racist enough. But this time he's using the term that's normally reserved for other whites on to a black man ?

When I say liberals, I mean liberals.

You can shove your slander up your ass.

I'm using it against you, because politically you are a liberal. You moron.

Even when you look at Asians (who white supremacist love to big up & not all of them are academically successfull, see the hmongs, P-I etc) they maybe are on average better educated than their whites due to cultural factors. But in America this doesn’t translate into greater financial success nor job security (as I have shown).

This is evident in the Ivy League’s admissions.

They (white supremacist) reject Asian applicants with higher GPAs and SATs than white students because they do not want more than 15% of the student body to be Asian. They apply these stereotypes because they do not want a c.h.i.n.k.s and g.o.oks making big bucks on Wall Street. They want a white boy to make big bucks on Wall Street, because of course, only white men are suitable for any big job. Right ?

They discriminate against asians AND whites in a desperate attempt to get a portion of the student body to be black and brown.

For you to call the liberal faculty of these institutions "white supremacist" is you being a racist fool.

Even the over 100 Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) dedicated to the advancement of education for blacks. However of course white supremacy affects them due to allocation of funding and resources that generally favor historically white universities like the Ivy League.

Not to mention that African Americans tend to be in the poorest areas of America were resources, teachers and local area are usually substandard. But then whites supremacists say blacks are stupid. Well why go to such efforts to fk shit up ? I mean were just gonna mess up everything. Right ?

Money does not drive education outcome. Parental involvement does.

You want blacks to do better in school? Marry the mother of your children and stay with her.

White social domination makes sure white schools out compete with black schools.

And even if black people do get the qualification. You really think that those white owned corps in silicon valley and Wall Street would gladly allow truck loads of black people in ?

Yes. Those institutions are dominated by drones that went though the normal indoctrination of university and most of them are good little mindless liberals who would love to have a diverse work force.

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Also as has been mentioned by IM2 or it could have been Asclepias (I'm not sure) Nigerian kids are out perform everyone in the USA and Canada but white privilege allows others to be more forgiving to white children who aren’t that serious about education and who make lots of mistakes. (Doing drugs and not getting caught, this happens a LOT. And slacking off a bit)

The lesson to take away from American education is that if you are white, you will get your due reward, and then some. If you are nonwhite, plan on working harder to get the same reward, if any at all.

Whites do look down on stupid whites, and criminal whites and ill mannered whites.

Yup and you're all three.

And you lie because you know that you are spewing shit, and you want to distract from that fact.

My point stands. WHites do look down on stupid whites, criminal whites and ill mannered whites.

We do not identify with them, celebrate them, and let them define our communities.

Donald Trump and other rich whites don't give a fk about you. What ? You think you're on same team as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett fool ?

Let’s take the ultimate computer nerd. Mark Zuckerberg (Founder or Facebook)

Do you really think he got to where because of intelligence and hard work ?

He attended two of the most expensive and prestigious schools in the USA (Harvard, Phillips Exeter Academy). His success was due to his parents bank account and a bit a luck but had little to do with his intelligence and hard work.

It’s that simple. Everyone from Bill Gates to Warren Buffett needed a substantial amount of money to start up their companies.

Take the average drug dealer born in the ghetto and put them into an upper middle class family all of the sudden they’ll become a fortune five hundred CEO.

The same type of person that has the personality and skills to run a criminal entrepreneurship can easily run a legal one, but many will never have the opportunity that will allow them to earn the credentials necessary to do so.

An interesting claim. ONe that should be easy to prove if it were so.


After all, there have been plenty of rich blacks over the last couple of generations, from inventors, to singers, to professional athletes, to lawyers, to politicians, ect, ect ect.


So, where are the studies showing that they are just as likely to be successful as their white counterparts?

YOu've been allowed to compete in all fields for generations.
The results are mixed.

Does racism exist ?

It was the vastly white voters and politicians that decided, time and time again, to support civil rights for non whites.

You are just repeating what you have already stated. So I'll post a link to the reply I stated

This nation was 90% white in 1950.

And this is the root of white racism. White genetic survival. Yeah whites will become half or roughly maybe 50% of the nation’s population by the latter part of the this century.

But the idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture and white people will be deculturated even when they are the norm.

White people will STILL be the largest single group BY FAR of any group in the United States.

This idea that whites can’t hang on at 50% when other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated

The idea that whites can’t do that at 50%, I mean, you must think white people are an incredibly weak-willed, or genetically defective, culturally retarded group of people if you think white people can’t maintain their own influence at 50%.

If we whites were as united against blacks as you like to pretend, Jim Crow would still be the Law of the Land.

The problems facing black people in America are socially engineered by the system. The system is made by white supremacists for white people interest only.

All white people understand this. That’s why they get hostile when black ppl speak about this.

That’s why in Arizona whites overwhelmingly supported that resolution that banned ethnic studies for black children.

All whites, no matter how ordinary, cheerful or inoffensive they appear to be are extremely RACE-CONSCIOUS, and have a ZERO SUM GAME PREDATORY mindset whenever blacks are concerned.

I never expect anything good coming from a system dominated by white supremacists simply because educated black people = more competitors against their own white children.

So it’s never in white supremacists interest to provide better education to black children.[/QUOTE]



Ethnic studies for black people in this time means indoctrination into hate by people like you.


THat's not good for anyone or anything. Banning that is nothing but common sense.

 

[Correll]

We whites aren't working to maintain any racism, the consensus has been to work against it for generations.


Your dismissal of those efforts is noted. YOu have my thanks.

Not of all of you. Only lowly poor stooges like yourself and the ones in power. The vast majority of other whites benefit so they dont rock the boat. Very few are working to reverse the centuries of white affirmative action and racism.

No thanks needed.

YOur words have no connection to reality.


But I do appreciate your utter dismissal of their efforts.


I mean, let's face it, they were fools blinded by idealism and hopes for a better future.


Now we have to wake the fuck up and deal with the unholy mess they created.


YOur racism and hate will be very valuable in that process.


I mean this sincerely.


Thank you. Keep up the good work.


I can't do it without people like you.

My words are reality incarnate. Your words are grounded (or should I say floating?) in white delusions.

No problem your white delusions are easily dismissed.

You have no better future. You are recessive and ultimately your fate is to be absorbed back into the human population.

You cant wake up. You have been sold and embraced a delusion of superiority to fight your inferiority complex.. if you were to face your reality you would see mass suicides among your race.

Me pointing this out is not hate. Its casual observation and reporting of the facts.

Youre thoroughly welcome.

Time will tell, idiot boy.

Time is not on your side recessive boy. Daily your women chose less affluent people of color over you in the instinctive hope their genes will pop up now and then as a recessive trait.

My traits might be recessive. Yours aren't going to over come 2 and a half billion asians, any more than mine, in the long run.


Laugh while you can, idiot boy.


Hey, did you know that HIspanics already outnumber you in this country?

YOu think that's going to slow down any time soon?