As Russian Collusion Fades, Ukrainian Help to Hillary Emerges

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,083
61,723
2,605
Right coast, classified
The torpedoes Democrats put in the water are circling around.

The Hill today:

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election — this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine’s top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton. . . .

In our interview, Lutsenko accused the Obama-era U.S. Embassy in 2016 of interfering in his ability to prosecute corruption cases, saying the U.S. ambassador gave him a list of defendants that he would not be allowed to pursue and then refused to cooperate in an early investigation into the alleged misappropriation of U.S. aid in Ukraine.

As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges
 
The torpedoes Democrats put in the water are circling around.

The Hill today:

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election — this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine’s top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton. . . .

In our interview, Lutsenko accused the Obama-era U.S. Embassy in 2016 of interfering in his ability to prosecute corruption cases, saying the U.S. ambassador gave him a list of defendants that he would not be allowed to pursue and then refused to cooperate in an early investigation into the alleged misappropriation of U.S. aid in Ukraine.

As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges
/-----/ But but but Mueller hasn't concluded his investigation yet...tick tock tick tock...
liberal rapid resonse team.jpg
 
The torpedoes Democrats put in the water are circling around.

The Hill today:

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election — this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine’s top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton. . . .

In our interview, Lutsenko accused the Obama-era U.S. Embassy in 2016 of interfering in his ability to prosecute corruption cases, saying the U.S. ambassador gave him a list of defendants that he would not be allowed to pursue and then refused to cooperate in an early investigation into the alleged misappropriation of U.S. aid in Ukraine.

As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges
/-----/ But but but Mueller hasn't concluded his investigation yet...tick tock tick tock...
View attachment 251522
Any day the orange man will be in jail!
 
I know every liberal will be playing the why are you bringing up Hillary or but but 44. But the last guy in the White House was the worst and most corrupt and ineffectual president we have ever had. Add in that we are aware that Hillary was not prosecuted for her server. The fact that she was given the questions before a debate. The fact she controlled the DNC funding. The fact that she was responsible for a smear piece on her opponent which came not from reliable sources. 44 administration holdovers tried a coup. Is anyone really surprised by this?
 

Forum List

Back
Top