As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges

[kwc57]

There is proof. The two Trump Tower meetings are proof of a conspiracy to use Russia in order to help Trump get elected.

All funny faces and no counter arguments to that truth. Lol! What does that tell us?

Probably that you continually lie and divert attention to how really stupid you are...but that is only the opinion of NORMAL citizens!

Lie about what? You didn't provide us with anything to debate, other than some fantasy conspiracy that no one knows where it is going. "Opening an investigation" Lol! And? That tells us nothing.

You mean JUST LIKE THE PHONY DISSIER that you bitter clingers CLING TO!!! That can't be proven!!!

Changing the subject from your own OP confirms how phony your own OP is.

The Dossier has already been verified by the FBI. You can pedal that lie until the cows come home, and reality will keep you in your potty chair.

Bullshit you say? Care to provide the class with the "verification". Comey disagrees with you.

 

[BWK]

All funny faces and no counter arguments to that truth. Lol! What does that tell us?

Probably that you continually lie and divert attention to how really stupid you are...but that is only the opinion of NORMAL citizens!

Lie about what? You didn't provide us with anything to debate, other than some fantasy conspiracy that no one knows where it is going. "Opening an investigation" Lol! And? That tells us nothing.

You mean JUST LIKE THE PHONY DISSIER that you bitter clingers CLING TO!!! That can't be proven!!!

Changing the subject from your own OP confirms how phony your own OP is.

The Dossier has already been verified by the FBI. You can pedal that lie until the cows come home, and reality will keep you in your potty chair.

Bullshit you say? Care to provide the class with the "verification". Comey disagrees with you.

Fact-checking Donald Trump: What the law says on collusion

Explain in legal terms how I am wrong.

 

[BWK]

If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

In your dreams, baby!
See all those redacted data in Mueller's reports to court? Do you imagine that's all jay-walking and speeding matters?

It's Mueller Time!

Hey moron, ask yourself one question. If there were rock solid proof in Mueller's hands that Trump and Russia conspired to steal the election, why would Mueller sit on it all this time and allow Trump to continue as President? Seriously, answer that. if he knew something a year and half ago or even a year or six months, do you let someone who stole the election continue running the country? The answer is no. If Mueller did that, it would be dereliction of duty and could face charges himself. Mueller has nothing of substance or Trump would already have been forced to resign, be impeached or sitting in jail.

Because it has evolved into a RICO investigation, and there are hundreds of leads that need to be followed totallying seventeen different investigations into Trump. That is why there is no Mueller report yet. This is the largest criminal investigation of a sitting president in US history. 37 players have already been indicted, more to come, and none of these players have been acquitted.

False, try again. Did Mueller's investigation stop with the indictments that have been handed down? No. Can Mueller indict the President if he has hard proof of a crime and continue on with further investigation? Yes. In fact, it would be irresponsible to allow Trump to stay in the position under false pretenses. Indict and keep digging. The fact that this has not happened is pretty good indication that Mueller has squat. Sorry to burst your bubble, but you need to prepare yourself for that eventuality.

We are presently under a RICO investigation into Trump. It is way bigger than just Trump, because so many players around Trump's circle are involved with Russia. From my vantage point, we are just getting started. Russia is just one leg up for Trump that he used in his tool box to get where he has gotten. Others he surrounded himself with were already involved with the Russian Mafia.

And by the way, 37 indictments and no acquittals tells me you better be prepared. This is the biggest organized criminal venture of a sitting president in US history.

Unfortunately, the report won't tell us everything, because a ton of it is in the SDNY.

 

[dudmuck]

Joe "The worlds dumbest politician and sexual abuser" Biden is going to have a Ukraine problem, too...

Biden’s Nepotism and Hypocrisy in Ukraine

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election - this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine's top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country's law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called "black ledger" files to U.S. media prompted Manafort's resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko's probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

First, anything from John Solomon can be dismissed immediately. Zero reputation of factual reporting.
But lets look at it anyway..

has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called “black ledger” files to U.S. media prompted Manafort’s resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

So, Ukrainians released dirt on Manafort, causing him to resign from the Trump campaign.

And they are arguing that was to benefit Clinton? No indications whatsoever that the Clinton campaign had anything to do with it.

 

[BWK]

Joe "The worlds dumbest politician and sexual abuser" Biden is going to have a Ukraine problem, too...

Biden’s Nepotism and Hypocrisy in Ukraine

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election - this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine's top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country's law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called "black ledger" files to U.S. media prompted Manafort's resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko's probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

First, anything from John Solomon can be dismissed immediately. Zero reputation of factual reporting.
But lets look at it anyway..

has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called “black ledger” files to U.S. media prompted Manafort’s resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

So, Ukrainians released dirt on Manafort, causing him to resign from the Trump campaign.

And they are arguing that was to benefit Clinton? No indications whatsoever that the Clinton campaign had anything to do with it.

I think this thread was intended as a diversion rather than a debate, seeing that there was no substance to it to begin with.

Calling it proof of something, when they were "opening an ivestigation", tells us this thread was never serious to begin with.

 

[sealybobo]

Joe "The worlds dumbest politician and sexual abuser" Biden is going to have a Ukraine problem, too...

Biden’s Nepotism and Hypocrisy in Ukraine

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election - this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine's top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country's law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called "black ledger" files to U.S. media prompted Manafort's resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko's probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

You know what's funny? The Mueller report isn't even out yet and you are already declaring it's a nothing burger. How do you know what Mueller has learned?

Here's What May Happen When The Mueller Investigation Is Completed

Despite some indications that special counsel Robert Mueller could be wrapping up, there has been no official word from the Justice Department confirming that's so.

But the prospect for the end of the Russia investigation, or at least the end of this phase, has resurrected many questions about where the story stands and what could happen next.

Here's what you need to know.

What is Mueller investigating?
The president goes back and forth about what he accepts about Russia's election interference, but he has been consistent about calling the Mueller investigation a "hoax" or a "witch hunt," part of a conspiracy by disgruntled Justice Department insiders who are out to get him.

Trump says he didn't know in 2016, for example, that Russians were making overtures to people on his campaign, including one that resulted in a delegation meeting at Trump Tower with Trump's son Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his then-campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.

Skeptics argue it's implausible that Trump couldn't have known about the Russian outreach, including that meeting, and have pointed to the fact that one month after it took place, Trump asked Russia — "if you're listening" — to try to locate Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's missing emails.

Mueller's investigators have since established that Russian hackers redoubled their cyberattacks against Clinton that very day. So far it isn't clear whether there was any connection to Trump's comments or whether there were other ties with Trump.

When could we learn whether there was a connection?
There's no official word as to when the special counsel's office may conclude its work and, if it does, whether it might release findings other than those that have been included in the public court cases.

So Mueller's report might not be public?
Correct — and there might not even be a "report."

The Justice Department's regulations call for Mueller's office to give the attorney general a "confidential" report when he completes his work, but new Attorney General William Barr doesn't have to release it.

Other regulations call upon Barr to make certain notices to the House and Senate judiciary committees, but not for Barr to give them, or the public, the work product from Mueller.

Barr has said he supports the idea of making public a report from Mueller's office, consistent with regulations and the law. Democrats say they worry about Barr not making an unconditional commitment to release something.

 

[Aponi]

So foreign meddling in our election suddenly isn't an problem because it involved Hillary Clinton and no doubt the Podesta Brothers?...
Actually there are billing records proving Hillary paid Perkins -Coie to contact Fusion GPS for the Dossier. It took an act of Congress to get those records. She worked at hiding that info, as she always does. She has lots of experience with collusion.
If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

There is proof. The two Trump Tower meetings are proof of a conspiracy to use Russia in order to help Trump get elected.

Bs thats npt proof of anything moron

 

[Aponi]

Joe "The worlds dumbest politician and sexual abuser" Biden is going to have a Ukraine problem, too...

Biden’s Nepotism and Hypocrisy in Ukraine

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election - this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine's top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country's law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called "black ledger" files to U.S. media prompted Manafort's resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko's probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

So where is the proof?

What? You need to be hit between the eyes with a 2x4.....typical denier!

Sounds like you got hit by one did you do it your self or did your mom

 

[Aponi]

I still thinks this should be in politics

 

[Doc7505]

So where is the proof?

What? You need to be hit between the eyes with a 2x4.....typical denier!

So, the thread is one of speculation, and you provided no proof. "Opening an investigation" is not proof boss. You lose.

Speculate that the Surrender Monkey and JoJo did nothing to help Ukraine....you can't even lie well!!

And you cannot prove anything. It's all hyperbole that tells us absolutely nothing. You lose, because you never had a dog in this fight. You showed up here with nothing but a prayer hoping this was really about something. You provided us with nothing.

And you can't prove the article is not true except in your deluded mind and apparently in the other low 2 digit IQ freaks that make up our ABNORMALS....ROTFLMFAO!!!!

Please note BWK never has quoted any researched information to support his/her statements. No facts to back it up.

 

[BWK]

What? You need to be hit between the eyes with a 2x4.....typical denier!

So, the thread is one of speculation, and you provided no proof. "Opening an investigation" is not proof boss. You lose.

Speculate that the Surrender Monkey and JoJo did nothing to help Ukraine....you can't even lie well!!

And you cannot prove anything. It's all hyperbole that tells us absolutely nothing. You lose, because you never had a dog in this fight. You showed up here with nothing but a prayer hoping this was really about something. You provided us with nothing.

And you can't prove the article is not true except in your deluded mind and apparently in the other low 2 digit IQ freaks that make up our ABNORMALS....ROTFLMFAO!!!!

Please note BWK never has quoted any researched information to support his/her statements. No facts to back it up.

Post #23 is a link to the proof and the statute, that Trump committed multiple conspiracies.

 

[BWK]

So foreign meddling in our election suddenly isn't an problem because it involved Hillary Clinton and no doubt the Podesta Brothers?...
Actually there are billing records proving Hillary paid Perkins -Coie to contact Fusion GPS for the Dossier. It took an act of Congress to get those records. She worked at hiding that info, as she always does. She has lots of experience with collusion.
If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

There is proof. The two Trump Tower meetings are proof of a conspiracy to use Russia in order to help Trump get elected.

Bs thats npt proof of anything moron

Post # 23 links the statute with the activity perfectly. It's a clear example of a conspiracy to attack the US in a presidential election. And if you think I am wrong, present the legal argument, or we will consider your no show a concession to the lawful facts.

 

[BWK]

So foreign meddling in our election suddenly isn't an problem because it involved Hillary Clinton and no doubt the Podesta Brothers?...
Actually there are billing records proving Hillary paid Perkins -Coie to contact Fusion GPS for the Dossier. It took an act of Congress to get those records. She worked at hiding that info, as she always does. She has lots of experience with collusion.
If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

There is proof. The two Trump Tower meetings are proof of a conspiracy to use Russia in order to help Trump get elected.

Bs thats npt proof of anything moron

The statute aligns perfectly with the cooperation and coordination of the two parties to get dirt on Clinton, while one of the parties was a foreign adversary. That is a textbook case of conspiracy to collude and attack the US in a presidential election. If you think it is not, presnt the legal argument against mine?

 

[BWK]

What? You need to be hit between the eyes with a 2x4.....typical denier!

So, the thread is one of speculation, and you provided no proof. "Opening an investigation" is not proof boss. You lose.

Speculate that the Surrender Monkey and JoJo did nothing to help Ukraine....you can't even lie well!!

And you cannot prove anything. It's all hyperbole that tells us absolutely nothing. You lose, because you never had a dog in this fight. You showed up here with nothing but a prayer hoping this was really about something. You provided us with nothing.

And you can't prove the article is not true except in your deluded mind and apparently in the other low 2 digit IQ freaks that make up our ABNORMALS....ROTFLMFAO!!!!

Please note BWK never has quoted any researched information to support his/her statements. No facts to back it up.

That is a lie.

 

[Doc7505]

So, the thread is one of speculation, and you provided no proof. "Opening an investigation" is not proof boss. You lose.

Speculate that the Surrender Monkey and JoJo did nothing to help Ukraine....you can't even lie well!!

And you cannot prove anything. It's all hyperbole that tells us absolutely nothing. You lose, because you never had a dog in this fight. You showed up here with nothing but a prayer hoping this was really about something. You provided us with nothing.

And you can't prove the article is not true except in your deluded mind and apparently in the other low 2 digit IQ freaks that make up our ABNORMALS....ROTFLMFAO!!!!

Please note BWK never has quoted any researched information to support his/her statements. No facts to back it up.

Post #23 is a link to the proof and the statute, that Trump committed multiple conspiracies.

~~~~~~
Your source of information? Perhaps Media Matters?

 

[Doc7505]

So foreign meddling in our election suddenly isn't an problem because it involved Hillary Clinton and no doubt the Podesta Brothers?...
Actually there are billing records proving Hillary paid Perkins -Coie to contact Fusion GPS for the Dossier. It took an act of Congress to get those records. She worked at hiding that info, as she always does. She has lots of experience with collusion.
If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

There is proof. The two Trump Tower meetings are proof of a conspiracy to use Russia in order to help Trump get elected.

Bs thats npt proof of anything moron

Post # 23 links the statute with the activity perfectly. It's a clear example of a conspiracy to attack the US in a presidential election. And if you think I am wrong, present the legal argument, or we will consider your no show a concession to the lawful facts.

Again where's your source of Information?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

In your dreams, baby!
See all those redacted data in Mueller's reports to court? Do you imagine that's all jay-walking and speeding matters?

It's Mueller Time!

Is that like Fitzmas?

 

[sealybobo]

Joe "The worlds dumbest politician and sexual abuser" Biden is going to have a Ukraine problem, too...

Biden’s Nepotism and Hypocrisy in Ukraine

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election - this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine's top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country's law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called "black ledger" files to U.S. media prompted Manafort's resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko's probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

You know what's funny? The Mueller report isn't even out yet and you are already declaring it's a nothing burger. How do you know what Mueller has learned?

Here's What May Happen When The Mueller Investigation Is Completed

Despite some indications that special counsel Robert Mueller could be wrapping up, there has been no official word from the Justice Department confirming that's so.

But the prospect for the end of the Russia investigation, or at least the end of this phase, has resurrected many questions about where the story stands and what could happen next.

Here's what you need to know.

What is Mueller investigating?
The president goes back and forth about what he accepts about Russia's election interference, but he has been consistent about calling the Mueller investigation a "hoax" or a "witch hunt," part of a conspiracy by disgruntled Justice Department insiders who are out to get him.

Trump says he didn't know in 2016, for example, that Russians were making overtures to people on his campaign, including one that resulted in a delegation meeting at Trump Tower with Trump's son Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his then-campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.

Skeptics argue it's implausible that Trump couldn't have known about the Russian outreach, including that meeting, and have pointed to the fact that one month after it took place, Trump asked Russia — "if you're listening" — to try to locate Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's missing emails.

Mueller's investigators have since established that Russian hackers redoubled their cyberattacks against Clinton that very day. So far it isn't clear whether there was any connection to Trump's comments or whether there were other ties with Trump.

When could we learn whether there was a connection?
There's no official word as to when the special counsel's office may conclude its work and, if it does, whether it might release findings other than those that have been included in the public court cases.

So Mueller's report might not be public?
Correct — and there might not even be a "report."

The Justice Department's regulations call for Mueller's office to give the attorney general a "confidential" report when he completes his work, but new Attorney General William Barr doesn't have to release it.

Other regulations call upon Barr to make certain notices to the House and Senate judiciary committees, but not for Barr to give them, or the public, the work product from Mueller.

Barr has said he supports the idea of making public a report from Mueller's office, consistent with regulations and the law. Democrats say they worry about Barr not making an unconditional commitment to release something.

Why haven’t any of you republicans responded to these facts?

 

[Doc7505]

Joe "The worlds dumbest politician and sexual abuser" Biden is going to have a Ukraine problem, too...

Biden’s Nepotism and Hypocrisy in Ukraine

After nearly three years and millions of tax dollars, the Trump-Russia collusion probe is about to be resolved. Emerging in its place is newly unearthed evidence suggesting another foreign effort to influence the 2016 election - this time, in favor of the Democrats.

Ukraine's top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country's law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the so-called "black ledger" files to U.S. media prompted Manafort's resignation from the Trump campaign and gave rise to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged Trump for the last two and a half years.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko's probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian's release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton's campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

~~~~~~
Indeed, indictments have been handed down to several people close to President Trump, yet to date note one indictment has been about "Collusion" with the Russians. Neither has the Mueller indicted Trump for any "Collusion" with Russia, or Russians. We do know from Politico.com going back to 2017 that documents show that Hillary and the Podesta Bros along with Manafort were conspiring with Ukrainian Oligarchs.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/19/paul-m...

WOW! Informant Ties Manafort-Tony Podesta-Hillary Clinton to Russia Collusion - www.independentsentinel.commanafort...

You know what's funny? The Mueller report isn't even out yet and you are already declaring it's a nothing burger. How do you know what Mueller has learned?

Here's What May Happen When The Mueller Investigation Is Completed

Despite some indications that special counsel Robert Mueller could be wrapping up, there has been no official word from the Justice Department confirming that's so.

But the prospect for the end of the Russia investigation, or at least the end of this phase, has resurrected many questions about where the story stands and what could happen next.

Here's what you need to know.

What is Mueller investigating?
The president goes back and forth about what he accepts about Russia's election interference, but he has been consistent about calling the Mueller investigation a "hoax" or a "witch hunt," part of a conspiracy by disgruntled Justice Department insiders who are out to get him.

Trump says he didn't know in 2016, for example, that Russians were making overtures to people on his campaign, including one that resulted in a delegation meeting at Trump Tower with Trump's son Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his then-campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.

Skeptics argue it's implausible that Trump couldn't have known about the Russian outreach, including that meeting, and have pointed to the fact that one month after it took place, Trump asked Russia — "if you're listening" — to try to locate Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's missing emails.

Mueller's investigators have since established that Russian hackers redoubled their cyberattacks against Clinton that very day. So far it isn't clear whether there was any connection to Trump's comments or whether there were other ties with Trump.

When could we learn whether there was a connection?
There's no official word as to when the special counsel's office may conclude its work and, if it does, whether it might release findings other than those that have been included in the public court cases.

So Mueller's report might not be public?
Correct — and there might not even be a "report."

The Justice Department's regulations call for Mueller's office to give the attorney general a "confidential" report when he completes his work, but new Attorney General William Barr doesn't have to release it.

Other regulations call upon Barr to make certain notices to the House and Senate judiciary committees, but not for Barr to give them, or the public, the work product from Mueller.

Barr has said he supports the idea of making public a report from Mueller's office, consistent with regulations and the law. Democrats say they worry about Barr not making an unconditional commitment to release something.

Why haven’t any of you republicans responded to these facts?

Indeed, we have responded with fact yet you and others like you fail to accept the truth. Even Politico.com and WAPO wrote about the conspiracy between Hillary, the Podesta Bros, Manafort and the Ukrainian Oligarchs back in 2016 - 2017.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump...

WOW! Informant Ties Manafort-Tony Podesta-Hillary Clinton to Russia Collusion - www.independentsentinel.commanafort..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/19/paul-m...

 

[22lcidw]

If there was any proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, Mueller and Weissman would have perp walked Trump out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave a long time ago to the delight of every Progressive and Deep State swamp rat in D.C.

In your dreams, baby!
See all those redacted data in Mueller's reports to court? Do you imagine that's all jay-walking and speeding matters?

It's Mueller Time!

Hey moron, ask yourself one question. If there were rock solid proof in Mueller's hands that Trump and Russia conspired to steal the election, why would Mueller sit on it all this time and allow Trump to continue as President? Seriously, answer that. if he knew something a year and half ago or even a year or six months, do you let someone who stole the election continue running the country? The answer is no. If Mueller did that, it would be dereliction of duty and could face charges himself. Mueller has nothing of substance or Trump would already have been forced to resign, be impeached or sitting in jail.

Because it has evolved into a RICO investigation, and there are hundreds of leads that need to be followed totallying seventeen different investigations into Trump. That is why there is no Mueller report yet. This is the largest criminal investigation of a sitting president in US history. 37 players have already been indicted, more to come, and none of these players have been acquitted.

False, try again. Did Mueller's investigation stop with the indictments that have been handed down? No. Can Mueller indict the President if he has hard proof of a crime and continue on with further investigation? Yes. In fact, it would be irresponsible to allow Trump to stay in the position under false pretenses. Indict and keep digging. The fact that this has not happened is pretty good indication that Mueller has squat. Sorry to burst your bubble, but you need to prepare yourself for that eventuality.

We are presently under a RICO investigation into Trump. It is way bigger than just Trump, because so many players around Trump's circle are involved with Russia. From my vantage point, we are just getting started. Russia is just one leg up for Trump that he used in his tool box to get where he has gotten. Others he surrounded himself with were already involved with the Russian Mafia.

And by the way, 37 indictments and no acquittals tells me you better be prepared. This is the biggest organized criminal venture of a sitting president in US history.

Unfortunately, the report won't tell us everything, because a ton of it is in the SDNY.

Tell me why Trump would run for President if this was true. So Trump would have to be part of the swamp or the destroyers of people are finding every wrong they can find on the true maverick and his people that was elected. The other maverick who is buried cost taxpayers trillions and trillions of dollars.