As predicted - Study shows Seattle $15 min wage result is less hours and 5000 less jobs

[hadit]

So, does this mean you're going to stop trying to call welfare something it is not?

Are you going to quibble about terms? There is no drug war clause. Abolish the drug war to promote the general welfare via social safety nets, right wingers.

You're babbling now, and hoping I'll forget that you admitted paying people for not working is welfare. Now you're trying to change the subject.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Providing for the general, not colonel or major welfare, is in our Constitution. A drug war is not. Whenever shall the right wing, understand the whole and entire, difference.

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

Are you going to quibble about terms? There is no drug war clause. Abolish the drug war to promote the general welfare via social safety nets, right wingers.

You're babbling now, and hoping I'll forget that you admitted paying people for not working is welfare. Now you're trying to change the subject.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Providing for the general, not colonel or major welfare, is in our Constitution. A drug war is not. Whenever shall the right wing, understand the whole and entire, difference.

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

 

[hadit]

You're babbling now, and hoping I'll forget that you admitted paying people for not working is welfare. Now you're trying to change the subject.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Providing for the general, not colonel or major welfare, is in our Constitution. A drug war is not. Whenever shall the right wing, understand the whole and entire, difference.

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

Providing for the general, not colonel or major welfare, is in our Constitution. A drug war is not. Whenever shall the right wing, understand the whole and entire, difference.

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

 

[hadit]

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

 

[hadit]

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

The repeal of prohibition led to vastly greater numbers of deaths from alcohol. You know that. It is for the better general welfare to prevent drug abuse.

 

[danielpalos]

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

The repeal of prohibition led to vastly greater numbers of deaths from alcohol. You know that. It is for the better general welfare to prevent drug abuse.

You are on the right wing wing; the general warfare on a for-profit basis seems, moral to y'all.

 

[hadit]

Wow, you don't even want to stay on the subject you brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

The repeal of prohibition led to vastly greater numbers of deaths from alcohol. You know that. It is for the better general welfare to prevent drug abuse.

You are on the right wing wing; the general warfare on a for-profit basis seems, moral to y'all.

Now I have to reel you back in because you're rambling. First you admitted that paying people to not work is welfare. If you're not careful, you're going to end up admitting that it would be for the general welfare to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

The greater glory of our republic and immortal souls are more important than right wing socialism on a national basis.

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

The repeal of prohibition led to vastly greater numbers of deaths from alcohol. You know that. It is for the better general welfare to prevent drug abuse.

You are on the right wing wing; the general warfare on a for-profit basis seems, moral to y'all.

Now I have to reel you back in because you're rambling. First you admitted that paying people to not work is welfare. If you're not careful, you're going to end up admitting that it would be for the general welfare to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am not the one resorting to appeals to emotion instead of economic forms of reason. Why do you believe solving simple poverty in our republic could ever be Bad, for any private sector?

 

[hadit]

It is for the general welfare of the country to prevent the abuse of drugs. Isn't the general welfare clause awesome? Speaking of which, you might want to put down the bong before answering, you're incoherent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

The repeal of prohibition led to vastly greater numbers of deaths from alcohol. You know that. It is for the better general welfare to prevent drug abuse.

You are on the right wing wing; the general warfare on a for-profit basis seems, moral to y'all.

Now I have to reel you back in because you're rambling. First you admitted that paying people to not work is welfare. If you're not careful, you're going to end up admitting that it would be for the general welfare to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am not the one resorting to appeals to emotion instead of economic forms of reason. Why do you believe solving simple poverty in our republic could ever be Bad, for any private sector?

Again, it is good for the general welfare to prevent drug abuse. Just say no.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

No, it isn't. You cannot prove it is, Because that would promote the general Badfare, not the general Welfare.

Prohibition was repealed as a Bad Idea, last millennium. Only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

The repeal of prohibition led to vastly greater numbers of deaths from alcohol. You know that. It is for the better general welfare to prevent drug abuse.

You are on the right wing wing; the general warfare on a for-profit basis seems, moral to y'all.

Now I have to reel you back in because you're rambling. First you admitted that paying people to not work is welfare. If you're not careful, you're going to end up admitting that it would be for the general welfare to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am not the one resorting to appeals to emotion instead of economic forms of reason. Why do you believe solving simple poverty in our republic could ever be Bad, for any private sector?

Again, it is good for the general welfare to prevent drug abuse. Just say no.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No; it is better to prevent the abomination of hypocrisy, simply for the greater glory of our republic and our immortal souls.

 

[P@triot]

The 'study' is skewed wishful thinking Bullshite. You can't or won't pay a fellow American a decent wage, either close your business, or don't open a business at all.

Watching you greedy, lazy left-wing lunatics deny reality is priceless...

Just in time for next week’s likely House vote on a federal $15 minimum wage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has come out with a caustic report on the consequences of the policy.

The report confirms what even liberal economists caution: A $15 minimum wage would “risk undesirable and unintended consequences” and lead to a survival-of-the-fittest labor market, where only the highest-skilled workers come out on top.

Forcing the free market to artificially inflate salaries beyond what a position is worth ends in catastrophic collapse like Venezuela. To cover the costs, everyone has to raise their prices. Which means the minimum wage worker is no further ahead. Which causes all of you leftists - who are completely ignorant of basic economics - to call for more minimum wage increases.

Here Are 6 Ways a New Report Devastates the $15 Minimum Wage

 

[Cellblock2429]

Are you going to quibble about terms? There is no drug war clause. Abolish the drug war to promote the general welfare via social safety nets, right wingers.

You're babbling now, and hoping I'll forget that you admitted paying people for not working is welfare. Now you're trying to change the subject.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Providing for the general, not colonel or major welfare, is in our Constitution. A drug war is not. Whenever shall the right wing, understand the whole and entire, difference.

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

/——/I’m still waiting for you libtards to open a business so we can see how much you overpay your employees.

 

[Cellblock2429]

You're babbling now, and hoping I'll forget that you admitted paying people for not working is welfare. Now you're trying to change the subject.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Providing for the general, not colonel or major welfare, is in our Constitution. A drug war is not. Whenever shall the right wing, understand the whole and entire, difference.

Paying people for not working is welfare. We agree on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol. good thing we have a General welfare clause that has to cover this and not a major welfare clause that can, "pass the buck".

Still trying to change the subject I see. Okay, since you clearly lost the last one. It is to the general welfare of the country to prevent drug abuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about the abomination of hypocrisy, for the greater glory of our Republic and our immortal souls?

/——/ What a load of hooey

 

[P@triot]

I’m still waiting for you libtards to open a business so we can see how much you overpay your employees.

Good news, Cellblock! You don’t have to wait. Check out this clown:

After the Sanders campaign was called out for not paying the $15 minimum wage that they demand others pay, they have now announced that they will have to cut the hours of their campaign team in order to be able to pay that wage.

Bwahahaha!!! If only the left understood basic economics.

Bernie Sanders campaign announces it will cut hours to pay staffers $15 minimum wage, prompting mockery