As Predicted, Democrats Using Ferguson Riots To Register Voters

Ferguson, Missouri, is a majority-black city governed mostly by whites. The mayor is white. The police chief is white. The police force is 94 percent white. Only one of its six city council members is black. These facts, as much as anything, have shaped the protests over the police shooting of Michael Brown. Ferguson, with a 67 percent black population, is a place where the largest community has little political voice.

Ferguson Missouri government Why is it so white

Michael Brown has forever changed the politics of Ferguson, Missouri. I applaud blacks for trying to register more black voters. All Americans should applaud them.
Yup, they'll be another Detroit overnight.

Translation: Blacks can't govern themselves; only whitey knows what's best for them.
You said it, I didn't.

Yes, you did say it. I just clarified your meaning.

Unfortunately there's some truth to it. What do you think would happen if blacks were to suddenly become law abiding citizens who actually worked for a living?

So you are saying that zero blacks are law abiding and zero percent work for a living..???:afro:
Democrats know they'll vote for a coke-head as long as he's black. They look at skin-color before anything else.
What do Republicans vote for.

Let me guess.......ummmmmmmm

White, male and christian
I don't think republicans really hate blacks, they just don't want them voting.
Republicans won't elect a black either

Be more than happy to see Rice or Carson in office. Or are they the wrong kind of negro? Ya racist fuck...
Wrong again. I just dont think a significant portion of the black community can act civil.

I know plenty of black people. I work with them, train with them, and have a couple in my family and they don't act the way you portray them to be.


Then explain Detroit...
I never said all blacks are like that. Thats the defense of the lying liberal.
I have a few black friends here in Houston and they dont act like that either.
But how do you explain all that do?
Why do you keep going on and on as if there were no white people in Detroit?

So you want to blame the absolute failure that detroit is on white people?
Detroit was destroyed by capitalists
 
Obama sent reps to Brown's funeral. Obama sent Sharpton and Holder to comfort and rally the black vote. Obama sent no one to the funeral of a General. Not too hard to figure out.
Sec Defense Hagel went to MG Greenes funeral
 
Ferguson, Missouri, is a majority-black city governed mostly by whites. The mayor is white. The police chief is white. The police force is 94 percent white. Only one of its six city council members is black. These facts, as much as anything, have shaped the protests over the police shooting of Michael Brown. Ferguson, with a 67 percent black population, is a place where the largest community has little political voice.

Ferguson Missouri government Why is it so white

Michael Brown has forever changed the politics of Ferguson, Missouri. I applaud blacks for trying to register more black voters. All Americans should applaud them.
Yup, they'll be another Detroit overnight.

Western civilization, which blacks cannot create nor sustain when left to their own devices, has eroded away in Detroit yet people continue to ignore the genetic realities behind Detroit's demise.
Yep...simply a puzzlement as to why black voters don't run in DROVES to the Republican Party.

No mystery at all...we dont go for giving people free shit just because. We'ed like you to put in a little effort first.
Unless they are corporations, right?

Corporations provide jobs. Me personally? I dont give a rats ass what losers do at this point because I'm done working.

More and more overseas jobs. And you guys just bend over and say "please sir, can I have another?"

Why are we losing jobs "overseas"?
What makes companies want to leave the u.s.?

Cheap labor.
 
Ferguson, Missouri, is a majority-black city governed mostly by whites. The mayor is white. The police chief is white. The police force is 94 percent white. Only one of its six city council members is black. These facts, as much as anything, have shaped the protests over the police shooting of Michael Brown. Ferguson, with a 67 percent black population, is a place where the largest community has little political voice.

Ferguson Missouri government Why is it so white

Michael Brown has forever changed the politics of Ferguson, Missouri. I applaud blacks for trying to register more black voters. All Americans should applaud them.
Yup, they'll be another Detroit overnight.

Translation: Blacks can't govern themselves; only whitey knows what's best for them.
You said it, I didn't.

Yes, you did say it. I just clarified your meaning.

Unfortunately there's some truth to it. What do you think would happen if blacks were to suddenly become law abiding citizens who actually worked for a living?

So you are saying that zero blacks are law abiding and zero percent work for a living..???:afro:
Democrats know they'll vote for a coke-head as long as he's black. They look at skin-color before anything else.
What do Republicans vote for.

Let me guess.......ummmmmmmm

White, male and christian
I don't think republicans really hate blacks, they just don't want them voting.
Republicans won't elect a black either

Be more than happy to see Rice or Carson in office. Or are they the wrong kind of negro? Ya racist fuck...
Wrong again. I just dont think a significant portion of the black community can act civil.

I know plenty of black people. I work with them, train with them, and have a couple in my family and they don't act the way you portray them to be.


Then explain Detroit...
I never said all blacks are like that. Thats the defense of the lying liberal.
I have a few black friends here in Houston and they dont act like that either.
But how do you explain all that do?
Why do you keep going on and on as if there were no white people in Detroit?

So you want to blame the absolute failure that detroit is on white people?
Detroit was destroyed by capitalists
It was destroyed by liberalism.
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
We already have that....

we call them "Red states"
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
Why don't Republicans set up their own "voting booths"?

at a riot? Why would anyone want to register voters at a race riot?

Because they know they can use it to keep a wedge between whites and blacks by using the good old "evil white racist" ploy.
It's very telling and sad in america when a campaign depends on whether or not it has the "minority" vote, rather than on the quality of the candidate.
Negroes couldn't care less who gets elected or what they stand for, just as long as they aren't white.
There is no point in continuing to try to reach out to them. They don't care. They will vote for whoever will further "their people's" goals which further works against white people because white people's tax dollars fund the majority of their socialist and entitlement programs.

obama knows this, too...Every time he/they talk about raising taxes he knows very well who the majority of taxpayers are and who it will affect the most.
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
We already have that....

we call them "Red states"

Give it up. Your distractions aren't "witty"..or "clever"..
 
And accept that kids get shot by the police.

Got it.:eusa_think:
Only a kid that robs a store and attacks a cop. They get what they deserve.

He wasn't shot close enough to be "attacking" a cop. Robbing a store does not get punished by immediate shooting on the spot, however much you may want it to be so.

Speaking of which, the video of Michael Brown in the store got released plenty fast. Why not photos and medical records of the supposed injuries from the "attack" on Officer Wilson?
 
Yet why do Democrats say that voter I.D. laws are racist?

Why has Eric Holder sued every state that tries to institute laws that require a picture I.D. to register or vote?

Probably because the ID laws effect minority voters the most. Gee, that wasn't difficult.

Here's the deal...and I'm using rough numbers. 22% of eligible voters don't have the photo ID required by some of the more restrictive ID states. The amount of voter fraud that would be stopped with these restrictive laws is less than 1%. When the number of voters that would be disenfranchised is less...or at least in single digits and much closer the fraud that would be stopped, I'm behind restrictive photo ID laws 100%.
Why do you think that?

Do you think being black means you're either too poor or too stupid to get a driver's license? That is exactly the implication here. Blacks need a picture I.D. to buy a pack of cigarettes or buy booze but it's racist to ask them for one when they go to the polls.

This is just another example of why Democrats are dishonest and their policies are inherently racist. Any fool could figure it out.
 
And accept that kids get shot by the police.

Got it.:eusa_think:
Only a kid that robs a store and attacks a cop. They get what they deserve.

He wasn't shot close enough to be "attacking" a cop. Robbing a store does not get punished by immediate shooting on the spot, however much you may want it to be so.

Speaking of which, the video of Michael Brown in the store got released plenty fast. Why not photos and medical records of the supposed injuries from the "attack" on Officer Wilson?
Because they have been purposely suppressed. I'm sure if the mainstream media wanted them leaked they'd be leaked to the public. Same thing with the Grand Jury findings. A decision has been made and the result has been suppressed because the governor needs time to plan for the riots that are expected after it becomes public.
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
We already have that....

we call them "Red states"
No, blue states. Idiot libtards.
 
And accept that kids get shot by the police.

Got it.:eusa_think:
Only a kid that robs a store and attacks a cop. They get what they deserve.

He wasn't shot close enough to be "attacking" a cop. Robbing a store does not get punished by immediate shooting on the spot, however much you may want it to be so.

Speaking of which, the video of Michael Brown in the store got released plenty fast. Why not photos and medical records of the supposed injuries from the "attack" on Officer Wilson?
The idiot agitaters got there faster.
 
Ferguson, Missouri, is a majority-black city governed mostly by whites. The mayor is white. The police chief is white. The police force is 94 percent white. Only one of its six city council members is black. These facts, as much as anything, have shaped the protests over the police shooting of Michael Brown. Ferguson, with a 67 percent black population, is a place where the largest community has little political voice.

Ferguson Missouri government Why is it so white

Michael Brown has forever changed the politics of Ferguson, Missouri. I applaud blacks for trying to register more black voters. All Americans should applaud them.
Yup, they'll be another Detroit overnight.

Translation: Blacks can't govern themselves; only whitey knows what's best for them.
You said it, I didn't.

Yes, you did say it. I just clarified your meaning.

Unfortunately there's some truth to it. What do you think would happen if blacks were to suddenly become law abiding citizens who actually worked for a living?

So you are saying that zero blacks are law abiding and zero percent work for a living..???:afro:
Democrats know they'll vote for a coke-head as long as he's black. They look at skin-color before anything else.
What do Republicans vote for.

Let me guess.......ummmmmmmm

White, male and christian
I don't think republicans really hate blacks, they just don't want them voting.
Republicans won't elect a black either

Be more than happy to see Rice or Carson in office. Or are they the wrong kind of negro? Ya racist fuck...
Wrong again. I just dont think a significant portion of the black community can act civil.

I know plenty of black people. I work with them, train with them, and have a couple in my family and they don't act the way you portray them to be.


Then explain Detroit...
I never said all blacks are like that. Thats the defense of the lying liberal.
I have a few black friends here in Houston and they dont act like that either.
But how do you explain all that do?
Why do you keep going on and on as if there were no white people in Detroit?

So you want to blame the absolute failure that detroit is on white people?
Detroit was destroyed by capitalists
It was destroyed by liberalism.
GM, Ford and Chrysler are run by liberals?
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
Why don't Republicans set up their own "voting booths"?

at a riot? Why would anyone want to register voters at a race riot?

Because they know they can use it to keep a wedge between whites and blacks by using the good old "evil white racist" ploy.
It's very telling and sad in america when a campaign depends on whether or not it has the "minority" vote, rather than on the quality of the candidate.
Negroes couldn't care less who gets elected or what they stand for, just as long as they aren't white.
There is no point in continuing to try to reach out to them. They don't care. They will vote for whoever will further "their people's" goals which further works against white people because white people's tax dollars fund the majority of their socialist and entitlement programs.

obama knows this, too...Every time he/they talk about raising taxes he knows very well who the majority of taxpayers are and who it will affect the most.
What race riot?
 
Democrats are about to get clobbered this November and their only recourse left is throwing out their fake race-card:



Al Franken Claims Republicans 'Don't Want Certain Americans to Vote' on Hmong TV
By P.J. Gladnick | September 1, 2014 | 10:15 A A
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Al Franken is currently attempting to present to the general public the image of someone who is willing to forge alliances with Republican senators as well as avoiding controversy by engaging in sweet corn filibusters when answering campaign questions. It is all part of his campaign strategy, along with refusing to debate his opponent, to run out the clock to election day.

However, when he thinks he can get away with it, Franken will pull out the race card and basically accuse Republicans of racism for supposedly wanting to suppress the vote of "certain Americans" as you can see at the 3:07 mark (and after the jump) in this Hmong TV video. In stark contrast to the genial and confident Franken which is being presented out in public, in the video he is bitterly divisive with an undertone of desperation:

al_franken.jpg




Let me tell you about getting out the vote. Now Republicans don't want you to get out the vote. They don't want Americans, they don't want certain Americans to vote. We had five conservative Supreme Court justices overturn the Voting Rights Act. Now this is an activist court. This is a conservative activist court. One hundred senators voted for the Voting Rights Act the last time it was passed. They overturned it and right away and right away states like North Carolina and Texas started going after people of color. They don't want you to vote. The vote is precious. So I need you to make sure that your friends register. That your friends get out to vote. We lose people in the midterms. A lot of our people vote in the presidentials and then don't vote in the midterms. And that's what happened in 2010. And that's why we had a government shutdown here in Minnesota and that's why we had a government shutdown in Washington. It is absolutely crucial that you turn people out to vote. Now the election is 68 days away. Now I know that many of you have jobs. Many of you have families. Ignore them.

And now here is the note of desperation from Franken:

Listen, seriously. I won by 312 votes. I won by 312 votes in the best year that the Democrats had in a generation....

So, Senator, why are you shamelessly playing the race card and accusing Republicans of suppressing the vote of "certain Americans?"

Hey, let me tell you about this sweet corn. It is so delicious that you can't stop at just one ear. And when you're done stuffing yourself with the sweet corn, try the walleye on a stick. Dripping with great taste. Then top it all off with chocolate chip cookies floating in a bottomless glass of ice cold milk and.....Al Franken Claims Republicans Don t Want Certain Americans to Vote on Hmong TV NewsBusters
 
They are purposely trying to mischaracterize the situation.

An analogy would be if white people set up a voter registration booth at a lynching of a negro criminal...
THEN the "progressives" would understand.

Setting up voting booths at the scene of a negro riot is a cynical ploy to exploit negro emotions.
Let them do it..Let them vote all black people in...

THIS is why we need to separate. The "diversity" experiment is a failure. Negroes don't want "equality". They don't want to assimilate....they want to displace white people.
Fine..let them have a couple of states to form their new africa. It can be entirely "black" run and governed. No white people to interfere.

..and they can pay their own way, too. No welfare or EBT from white people to fund their dysfunction....It's a "win-win" for both sides.
No more AA giving them jobs they aren't qualified for....No more quotas based on race...no more "racism" holding them back.
They can achieve everything they have ever aspired to...
Why don't Republicans set up their own "voting booths"?

at a riot? Why would anyone want to register voters at a race riot?

Because they know they can use it to keep a wedge between whites and blacks by using the good old "evil white racist" ploy.
It's very telling and sad in america when a campaign depends on whether or not it has the "minority" vote, rather than on the quality of the candidate.
Negroes couldn't care less who gets elected or what they stand for, just as long as they aren't white.
There is no point in continuing to try to reach out to them. They don't care. They will vote for whoever will further "their people's" goals which further works against white people because white people's tax dollars fund the majority of their socialist and entitlement programs.

obama knows this, too...Every time he/they talk about raising taxes he knows very well who the majority of taxpayers are and who it will affect the most.
What race riot?

go try to change the subject and create a distraction on someone else. It doesn't work on me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top