Tech_Esq
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
here is who represents the illegals.
The illegal aliens are represented by a well-funded, radical open-borders group Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)that refers to the U.S. governments immigration enforcement effort as racist and xenophobic.
MALDEF, which claims there is no distinction between legal and illegal immigrants, has sued a state to obtain free public education for illegal aliens and various public colleges nationwide for denying illegal immigrants admission. After the 2001 terrorist attacks the group led a large-scale protest campaign against a federal crackdown on airport workers with immigration violations, claiming it harmed the civil rights of Latinos.
I don't believe there is a constitutional basis for their claim. It's a shame that this man has gotten caught in their litigious crossfire.
By the way, here is a possible inadvertent outcome from this suit. In Florida, and several other states, though I'm not sure where Arizona falls, if a person trespasses on your property, and you have a reasonable belief that they mean you harm, you can shoot them, and you have legal immunity from prosecution.
It would be ironic if this had the result of encouraging ranchers in Arizona to SHOOT illegals, rather than rounding them up for ICE.
I think in most states, if you are not in your domicile, you have a "duty to retreat". However, if you are in your house there is typically no such duty, but there is a parity/distance issue. In other words, if the guy has a bat, you can't shoot him 50 feet away. The theory being that he can't strike a deadly blow against you from 50 feet away. Now, anywhere from 5-15 feet, blast away Dirty Harry.
The common law is rife with "spring gun" cases from the 1600s. As you might imagine the impoverished wretches of 17th century England liked to do a bit of thieving and a common method was to break into the backyard of the house where you would be out of sight, then break in. So, the wise rich folk with stuff to steal used to set a spring gun inside the back gate to shoot house breakers. Well, enough got shot that they decided that might not be good public policy so they outlawed it.
Using deadly force to protect "property" is tricky business and usually not allowed. That is unless you work for the government and the property belongs to Uncle Sugar.