Aren't all gun control laws unconstitutional?

[M14 Shooter]

You don't have unlimited free speech rights
You don't have unlimited rights for pursuit of happiness
You don't have unlimited rights

In all of the cases where a right protected by the constitution has been limited, said limit was drawn where someone else was harmed or placed in a condition of clear, present and imminent danger.

How do you suppose this applies to limits on the right to keep and bear arms?

????!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahhaahahahhahaha
I don't see '''free speech'' on the list below

Ah. You do not have the capacity to meaningfully address the issue put to you.
Thanks.

you use the coward's way out--Mr Tough Guy
afraid to even discuss the issue--hahahahahahhahaha

Says he who did not even try to address anything I said.
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

 

[harmonica]

You don't have unlimited free speech rights
You don't have unlimited rights for pursuit of happiness
You don't have unlimited rights

In all of the cases where a right protected by the constitution has been limited, said limit was drawn where someone else was harmed or placed in a condition of clear, present and imminent danger.

How do you suppose this applies to limits on the right to keep and bear arms?

????!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahhaahahahhahaha
I don't see '''free speech'' on the list below

Ah. You do not have the capacity to meaningfully address the issue put to you.
Thanks.

you use the coward's way out--Mr Tough Guy
afraid to even discuss the issue--hahahahahahhahaha

Says he who did not even try to address anything I said.
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

run away coward
big tough guy M14 shooter

 

[M14 Shooter]

In all of the cases where a right protected by the constitution has been limited, said limit was drawn where someone else was harmed or placed in a condition of clear, present and imminent danger.

How do you suppose this applies to limits on the right to keep and bear arms?

????!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahhaahahahhahaha
I don't see '''free speech'' on the list below

Ah. You do not have the capacity to meaningfully address the issue put to you.
Thanks.

you use the coward's way out--Mr Tough Guy
afraid to even discuss the issue--hahahahahahhahaha

Says he who did not even try to address anything I said.
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

run away coward
big tough guy M14 shooter

I accept your concession of the point.
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

 

[justinacolmena]

My point is and forever will be that the bill of rights the first 10 are a directive to the federal government what it must do and forbids it from creating arbitrary laws restricting those rights.

My point is that the Bill of Rights is binding on all state & local government as well as federal. The Constitution does not allow that loophole for the Democratic Socialists' precious Town Hall to infringe our rights.

There is something very unsavory & anti-constitutional going on, called the City Hall Biometric Launch. It's a grand unified gun control database.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

You don't have unlimited free speech rights
You don't have unlimited rights for pursuit of happiness
You don't have unlimited rights

In all of the cases where a right protected by the constitution has been limited, said limit was drawn where someone else was harmed or placed in a condition of clear, present and imminent danger.

How do you suppose this applies to limits on the right to keep and bear arms?

????!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahhaahahahhahaha
I don't see '''free speech'' on the list below

Ah. You do not have the capacity to meaningfully address the issue put to you.
Thanks.

you use the coward's way out--Mr Tough Guy
afraid to even discuss the issue--hahahahahahhahaha
and I guess you're ready to quick draw on some badass criminal
hahahahhahahaha
you'd pee in your pants

As an outsider to this pissing match, I'm quite put off by it. But, I've been drawn into a few of them myself. What I'd like to know is if any of those of you who make posts like that have ever taken the challenge to PM and asked the guy you're arguing with to name the time and place?

The pissing matches are not informative, entertaining, or conducive to any kind of productive civil discourse. Honestly, there are people on these boards that I'd give my front seat in Hell if they would PM me and say name the time and place.

Unless you're going to do that, this Internet jockeying is a waste of time. A suggestion would be, rather than begin putting words into each other's mouths, you start out with a question: Did you mean to say...? That would make more people read the posts. But, really, some posts go for hundreds - sometimes thousands with the same points being made and people implying they'd like to take each other on. Hell, a face to face would resolve a lot; the meeting could be put on YouTube and it might be entertaining. It's just a thought.

 

[Slashsnake]

of course you have unlimited Free Speech but you might be arrested for causing a panic after you yell FIRE in a theatre where there is NO Fire .

no no--it's not free if you get arrested / fired from your job/lose $$$/etc
lot's have people have been fired for '''racist'' free speech
lot's of people have been fired for '''''free speech''''
or your pay/income is effected
free
/frē/
Learn to pronounce
adjective

1. 1.
   not under the control or in the power of another; able to act or be done as one wishes.
   "I have no ambitions other than to have a happy life and be free"
2. 2.
   not or no longer confined or imprisoned.
   "the researchers set the birds free"
   synonyms: on the loose, at liberty, at large; More

adverb

1. 1.
   without cost or payment.

Your employer cannot violate your right to free speech.

The First Amendment only applies to the government not the general public

As in the words "Congress shall pass no law...."

It's the same thing for any social media platform. Facebook etc has no obligation to provide you a venue to exercise your rights to free speech and cannot violate your right to free speech since you agreed to their terms of service when you signed up.

My problem with the government and courts is that they get to pick and choose which constitutional rights apply in the workplace. You either apply all or none... I vote for none. If you don't have a right to have a gun or free speech in the work place, the 14th amendment doesn't apply to the workplace either (such as sexual harassment laws, discrimination, etc.).

The Bill of Rights and U.S Constitution don't apply to private citizens and businesses, no exceptions. A workplace is free to apply their own sexual harassment and discrimination policies.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Aren't all gun control laws unconstitutional?

At the founding, all federal gun laws were unconstitutional.

Because the 14th Amendment is so broadly and clumsily written, now ALL gun laws are unconstitutional (or they should be, by any reasonable interpretation of the 14th).

 

[Porter Rockwell]

of course you have unlimited Free Speech but you might be arrested for causing a panic after you yell FIRE in a theatre where there is NO Fire .

no no--it's not free if you get arrested / fired from your job/lose $$$/etc
lot's have people have been fired for '''racist'' free speech
lot's of people have been fired for '''''free speech''''
or your pay/income is effected
free
/frē/
Learn to pronounce
adjective

1. 1.
   not under the control or in the power of another; able to act or be done as one wishes.
   "I have no ambitions other than to have a happy life and be free"
2. 2.
   not or no longer confined or imprisoned.
   "the researchers set the birds free"
   synonyms: on the loose, at liberty, at large; More

adverb

1. 1.
   without cost or payment.

Your employer cannot violate your right to free speech.

The First Amendment only applies to the government not the general public

As in the words "Congress shall pass no law...."

It's the same thing for any social media platform. Facebook etc has no obligation to provide you a venue to exercise your rights to free speech and cannot violate your right to free speech since you agreed to their terms of service when you signed up.

My problem with the government and courts is that they get to pick and choose which constitutional rights apply in the workplace. You either apply all or none... I vote for none. If you don't have a right to have a gun or free speech in the work place, the 14th amendment doesn't apply to the workplace either (such as sexual harassment laws, discrimination, etc.).

The Bill of Rights and U.S Constitution don't apply to private citizens and businesses, no exceptions. A workplace is free to apply their own sexual harassment and discrimination policies.

If only that were true. Bot sides of the political aisle try to tell employers who they can and cannot hire.

 

[elektra]

Arms, Armaments. Arms, weapons (of war), weaponry, firearms, guns, ordnance, cannon, artillery, munitions, instruments of war, war machines, military supplies.

We have a right by our creator, a right that government can not infringe, to own cannons and artillery.

Some idiot said that was written by imperfect humans, males (cause he knows perfect) that believed slavery was okay. Uh, History lesson needed!

The USA's creation by males, wrote a Declaration of Independence and Constitution that resulted in Slavery ending, largely, worldwide! Despite Democrats fighting a civil war to keep slavery!

Yes, those imperfect males ended slavery, I bet there are no African Americans willing to give their guns to the DemoRATs, who were the KKK and who opposed the Civil Rights Act of the 1960's!