Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,401
- 2,180
Wait.
You think fossils are bones, don't you?
LEAVES have fossils, you flaming moron.
Leaves have imprints, keep the insults to a minimum please this is the CDZ..
Out of my league? I gave you facts Cooks 97 percent number was bogus and clearly debunked..
All you gave me were your "feelings" your "belief" of the AGW cult...
Look at the thread title it's obvious you vote your "feelings" regardless of facts.
No, it was not "clearly debunked", it was "clarified" by the authors. You're choosing to read "debunked" because you have an emotional reaction to anyone who mentions climate change and attributes human activity as a cause.
Clarified by its authors, What the heck are you talking about have a link?
Yeah, yours. They took issue with the core theme of their own research, not whether or not they "believed" in human-caused climate change. Moreover, the study proved that the more expertise each paper contained regarding climate science, the more likely they were to agree that humans cause the vast majority of it.
Seriously you are making stuff up as you go.
Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims