emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
wasn't about being inclusive.
Well Dante, if the language "loses" the audience and isn't inclusive,
how are we going to form solutions that include everyone?
Are we going to keep making laws that leave out whole sectors?
Are we only going to elect ONE party at a time that represents
and speaks to "half the nation" while taking turns leaving out the other half?
We at least should have a way to translate back and forth.
Even if there isn't just one "Esperanto" language that everyone
agrees to use, we should be able to translate concepts
and principles into terms that people can understand per group.
Then include all groups even if they don't speak or frame
information in the same format.