Are we undergoing global cooling?

[expat_panama]

We have mixed politics with science once again and the result is junk science.

In the past we mixed politics and science to make marijuana illegal. Junk science at its best.

Sessions Cites Junk Science to Shut Down Pot Research

Once again, a committed drug warrior ignores and blocks legitimate scientific research, then cites the fact that science hasn’t proven the drug ‘safe’ as his reason for doing so.

www.thedailybeast.com

tx fer the headsup

my thinking is that eventually this all should really come to light, maybe it's my consideration of our ever advancing civilization making right former wrongs.

 

[Crick]

​

By Dale Leuck March 17, 2018​

​

Data available in both text and csv formats at the NASA, GISS website have been routinely cited as indicative of global warming despite their known weaknesses. The three years 2015 through 2017 are widely reported as the three hottest years on record.​

​

Tony Heller, however, has demonstrated that tampering with data from the U.S. Climatology Network (USHCN) has created the illusion of much higher temperatures in reported data than in the original data, for the continental United States. This leads one to wonder how much not so widely known "adjustments" in GISS data have been responsible for similar results at a global level.​

​

The GISS data are updated around the middle of each month, and I have compared the January and March versions in figure 1, for the years 1881 through 2017. The data are smoothed over two years, in that, for example, the 1881 data point is the average of 1880 and 1881 and 2017 the average for 2016 and 2017. This is commonly done to make data more presentable, allowing movements to be more clearly discerned and to smooth out the effects of "abnormal" years...​

​

​

...any data set from only 1880, and inadequately covering the earth's surface area, does not provide a definitive answer to the question of "global warming" in terms of geological time of thousands of years, and representing the entirety of the Earth. But, as it has been the data set often referenced to substantiate global warming, one would have thought the substantially lower temperatures of the last many months would have merited highlighting in the mainstream media.​

Read more: Are we undergoing global cooling?

The data definitely show global cooling in a form I did see mentioned in the article. Instead of seeing new annual temperatures reaching new lows what we really have are past recorded temperatures plummeting year after year [from the article:

This has been also happening for temperatures farther back in history which also have been falling at an ever increasing rate:

Ministry Of Truth – Erasing The Medieval Warm Period. | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

Your reference sources here: Tony Heller, American Thinker, Real (sic) Climate Science, are simply pathetic. Here is temperature data from six different sources.

This adds the Japanese Meteorological Agency

 

[ding]

Your reference sources here: Tony Heller, American Thinker, Real (sic) Climate Science, are simply pathetic. Here is temperature data from six different sources.

View attachment 536800

This adds the Japanese Meteorological Agency

View attachment 536803

That includes the effect of urbanization. If you want to make an argument for CO2 you would need to post the rural temperature data. Ideally you would post them side by side to be fully transparent.

 

[ding]

​

By Dale Leuck March 17, 2018​

​

Data available in both text and csv formats at the NASA, GISS website have been routinely cited as indicative of global warming despite their known weaknesses. The three years 2015 through 2017 are widely reported as the three hottest years on record.​

​

Tony Heller, however, has demonstrated that tampering with data from the U.S. Climatology Network (USHCN) has created the illusion of much higher temperatures in reported data than in the original data, for the continental United States. This leads one to wonder how much not so widely known "adjustments" in GISS data have been responsible for similar results at a global level.​

​

The GISS data are updated around the middle of each month, and I have compared the January and March versions in figure 1, for the years 1881 through 2017. The data are smoothed over two years, in that, for example, the 1881 data point is the average of 1880 and 1881 and 2017 the average for 2016 and 2017. This is commonly done to make data more presentable, allowing movements to be more clearly discerned and to smooth out the effects of "abnormal" years...​

​

​

...any data set from only 1880, and inadequately covering the earth's surface area, does not provide a definitive answer to the question of "global warming" in terms of geological time of thousands of years, and representing the entirety of the Earth. But, as it has been the data set often referenced to substantiate global warming, one would have thought the substantially lower temperatures of the last many months would have merited highlighting in the mainstream media.​

Read more: Are we undergoing global cooling?

The data definitely show global cooling in a form I did see mentioned in the article. Instead of seeing new annual temperatures reaching new lows what we really have are past recorded temperatures plummeting year after year [from the article:

This has been also happening for temperatures farther back in history which also have been falling at an ever increasing rate:

Ministry Of Truth – Erasing The Medieval Warm Period. | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

It's not a surprise that they massage the data.

 

[expat_panama]

It's not a surprise that they massage the data.

Aw heck it's not "massaging", let's say it's more like putting our best foot forward...

 

[ding]

Aw heck it's not "massaging", let's say it's more like putting our best foot forward...

The end justifies the means.

 

[Old Rocks]

/----/ I asked Global Warmers for years what would they say if this happens. That's when I first learned I was a Nazi and a Denier.

I don't know about the former, but you are definitely the latter, as well as being bone ignorant on the subject.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I don't know about the former, but you are definitely the latter, as well as being bone ignorant on the subject.

/——/ What am I denying, that global warming is real, or a manipulation of data for political means like the article states?