Are USMB LWers along with Politico Willing To Admit the Hitech Lynching of Cain?

The confidentiality agreement has been lifted, and STILL no one comes forward to say anything about Herman Cain's conduct. Meanwhile, the left wing rag Politico has run 90 STORIES smearing Cain demonstrating nothing but sleazy, racist, leftist tactics in an attempt to destroy a leading republican presidential contender because he's BLACK. The ugly, deeply rooted, racist roots of the democrat party are really rearing their nasty head on this one.

Cain accuser stands by sexual harassment complaint | Election 2012 - Home

Herman Cain accuser stands by complaint, won't go public - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

Politico publishes 90 stories on Cain scandal | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

You know, when trying to get even with someone, it's generally considered a good idea to fire in the direction of the actual perpetrator of the offense in question. Otherwise, you're firing blind.

Liberals didn't have squat to do with the story. It's the RNC who doesn't want Cain to win the nomination. And EVERY other GOP candidate, of course.


Look in the direction of Karl Rove. He has a LONG history of doing things like this.

Riiiight.

Like there's no motivation for a left wing hack to "get behind" an early smear campaign effort.

If they can help pick-off the opposition's possible nominees this early, then they can fight their preferred opposition-candidate somewhere down the road.

To the limited extent that it seems likely that a Republican or two is behind the present smear campaign, I don't mind agreeing with you. But even so, that doesn't rule out the prospect that a left wing Democratic might not be offering some behind the scenes assistance. If it can be seen as something of value to them, you can bet they'd do so. Gladly. And if they can then lay the "blame" solely (but inaccurately) at the doorstep of some GOP candidate or supporter, so much the better.

Liberals would save it for the general election, assuming Cain got that far.

Republicans are trying to keep Cain from getting that far. That's why it happened when it did.
 
So is Herb off the hook now Pale rider?

That's assuming he was ever "on" the hook, which I don't believe he was.

He hasn't slipped even a fraction of a percent in the polls. People can see this is nothing more than the lefty smear machine throwing shit against the wall to see if any of it will stick.

Funny how it's the same party that was telling us that Bubba Clinton dipping his cigar in Monica's twat while getting sucked off IN THE WHITE HOUSE and IN THE OVAL OFFICE just WASN'T ANY OF OUR BUSINESS. But now they're just EXPLODING with ANGER about nothing much more than a RUMOR, and now it IS OUR BUSINESS?

Mother fucking HYPOCRITES!!
 
Last edited:
Will the Right now apologize for all the times they ridiculed liberals for playing the race card?

Once the left stops leveling the false accusations that Republicans, Conservatives, Libertarians, and Teapartiers are more racist than any other group of people I will happily write a long apology thread on the USMB.

Until then the liberal racists are going to be made fun of for their false claims of racism and personal hypocricy on race whenever the opportunity arises
 
So is Herb off the hook now Pale rider?

That's assuming he was ever "on" the hook, which I don't believe he was.

He hasn't slipped even a fraction of a percent in the polls. People can see this is nothing more than the lefty smear machine throwing shit against the wall to see if any of it will stick.

Funny how it's the same party that was telling us that Bubba Clinton dipping his cigar in Monica's twat while getting sucked off IN THE WHITE HOUSE and IN THE OVAL OFFICE just WASN'T ANY OF OUR BUSINESS. But now they're just EXPLODING with ANGER about nothing much more than a RUMOR, and now it IS OUR BUSINESS?

Mother fucking HYPOCRITES!!

Herman Cain reports record fundraising day - BostonHerald.com

actually he broke a fundraising record this last week
 
So is Herb off the hook now Pale rider?

That's assuming he was ever "on" the hook, which I don't believe he was.

He hasn't slipped even a fraction of a percent in the polls. People can see this is nothing more than the lefty smear machine throwing shit against the wall to see if any of it will stick.

Funny how it's the same party that was telling us that Bubba Clinton dipping his cigar in Monica's twat while getting sucked off IN THE WHITE HOUSE and IN THE OVAL OFFICE just WASN'T ANY OF OUR BUSINESS. But now they're just EXPLODING with ANGER about nothing much more than a RUMOR, and now it IS OUR BUSINESS?

Mother fucking HYPOCRITES!!

Herman Cain reports record fundraising day - BostonHerald.com

actually he broke a fundraising record this last week

which is really sad.
 
You know, when trying to get even with someone, it's generally considered a good idea to fire in the direction of the actual perpetrator of the offense in question. Otherwise, you're firing blind.

Liberals didn't have squat to do with the story. It's the RNC who doesn't want Cain to win the nomination. And EVERY other GOP candidate, of course.


Look in the direction of Karl Rove. He has a LONG history of doing things like this.

Riiiight.

Like there's no motivation for a left wing hack to "get behind" an early smear campaign effort.

If they can help pick-off the opposition's possible nominees this early, then they can fight their preferred opposition-candidate somewhere down the road.

To the limited extent that it seems likely that a Republican or two is behind the present smear campaign, I don't mind agreeing with you. But even so, that doesn't rule out the prospect that a left wing Democratic might not be offering some behind the scenes assistance. If it can be seen as something of value to them, you can bet they'd do so. Gladly. And if they can then lay the "blame" solely (but inaccurately) at the doorstep of some GOP candidate or supporter, so much the better.

Liberals would save it for the general election, assuming Cain got that far.

Republicans are trying to keep Cain from getting that far. That's why it happened when it did.

Cain is the GOPs worst nightmare if they get stuck with him as a candidate. Dems would like nothing better than to get Romney and Perry out of the way in favor of an eminently beatable candidate

You think the upcoming caucus in socially conservative Iowa had anything to do with it?
 
Last edited:
So is Herb off the hook now Pale rider?

That's assuming he was ever "on" the hook, which I don't believe he was.

He hasn't slipped even a fraction of a percent in the polls. People can see this is nothing more than the lefty smear machine throwing shit against the wall to see if any of it will stick.

Funny how it's the same party that was telling us that Bubba Clinton dipping his cigar in Monica's twat while getting sucked off IN THE WHITE HOUSE and IN THE OVAL OFFICE just WASN'T ANY OF OUR BUSINESS. But now they're just EXPLODING with ANGER about nothing much more than a RUMOR, and now it IS OUR BUSINESS?

Mother fucking HYPOCRITES!!

You DO understand the concept of consent, don't you?

What's hypocritical is condemning Clinton for consensual sex and then defending Cain when there's a great deal of evidence that he sexually harassed much younger women in the workplace, especially when he was in a position of power over them.
 
So is Herb off the hook now Pale rider?

That's assuming he was ever "on" the hook, which I don't believe he was.

He hasn't slipped even a fraction of a percent in the polls. People can see this is nothing more than the lefty smear machine throwing shit against the wall to see if any of it will stick.

Funny how it's the same party that was telling us that Bubba Clinton dipping his cigar in Monica's twat while getting sucked off IN THE WHITE HOUSE and IN THE OVAL OFFICE just WASN'T ANY OF OUR BUSINESS. But now they're just EXPLODING with ANGER about nothing much more than a RUMOR, and now it IS OUR BUSINESS?

Mother fucking HYPOCRITES!!

You DO understand the concept of consent, don't you?

What's hypocritical is condemning Clinton for consensual sex and then defending Cain when there's a great deal of evidence that he sexually harassed much younger women in the workplace, especially when he was in a position of power over them.

What evidence? Gold diggers?
 
Let's see....

Cain worked for the Federal Reserve and was a lobbyist for the American Restaurant Association whose main goal is to eliminate the minimum wage.

While working at the NRA Cain sexually harasses three women so bad that the NRA has to pay one of them off with a year's salary to keep quiet.

Then Cain hires the smoking guy to run his campaign in spite of the fact that the smoking guy was banned from Wisconsin politics for illegal campaign funding.

Then the smoking guy starts Cain's campaign by taking money from a Koch brothers non profit which is a felony.

Then Cain quotes a Pokemon movie as his inspiration.

Then we discover that Cain's tax plan comes from the online game, the Sims.

Then Cain says it doesn't matter if he knows who is the president of "Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan" is.

In between all this Cain takes a month off from the campaign for a book tour.

I have a feeling that Cain is Palin'n us.

He's just in this to sell books.
 
i love when white supremacists use terms like 'high tech lynching'.

You mean like the racists over at Politico, your leftist rag?

Nobody on the planet is more racist than you leftists, and it's really on display here.

Nice try to lie and deflect though.

the thing is, politico is fairly conservative. that's why whatever republican who leaked the story used that site to do it.

tell us... do they use the term 'high tech lynching' on stormfront?

:thup:
 
You know, when trying to get even with someone, it's generally considered a good idea to fire in the direction of the actual perpetrator of the offense in question. Otherwise, you're firing blind.

Liberals didn't have squat to do with the story. It's the RNC who doesn't want Cain to win the nomination. And EVERY other GOP candidate, of course.


Look in the direction of Karl Rove. He has a LONG history of doing things like this.

Riiiight.

Like there's no motivation for a left wing hack to "get behind" an early smear campaign effort.

If they can help pick-off the opposition's possible nominees this early, then they can fight their preferred opposition-candidate somewhere down the road.

To the limited extent that it seems likely that a Republican or two is behind the present smear campaign, I don't mind agreeing with you. But even so, that doesn't rule out the prospect that a left wing Democratic might not be offering some behind the scenes assistance. If it can be seen as something of value to them, you can bet they'd do so. Gladly. And if they can then lay the "blame" solely (but inaccurately) at the doorstep of some GOP candidate or supporter, so much the better.

Liberals would save it for the general election, assuming Cain got that far.

Republicans are trying to keep Cain from getting that far. That's why it happened when it did.


That's not necessarily true.

A good forward thinking left winger might save it for later. That's a plausible option.

But a left winger MIGHT also (just as ligically) feel an incentive to use it now, to breed some good solid right wing in-fighting. Pick off the right wing candidates early on who might pose an eventual real threat. Get them to do it to each other.

This aint rocket science. Keeping the powder dry for future use is a wonderful notion, but so is using a little sprinkle of your powder now in order to get your political opponents to do your dirty work FOR you, on the cheap, nice and early.

How much more convenient would it be -- could it be -- than to get the RW opponents to PICK the very candidate whom you feel is the easiest to defeat down the road?

So, your read on it is plausible. Congrats.

But you aren't necessarily correct.
 
i love when white supremacists use terms like 'high tech lynching'.

You mean like the racists over at Politico, your leftist rag?

Nobody on the planet is more racist than you leftists, and it's really on display here.

Nice try to lie and deflect though.

the thing is, politico is fairly conservative. that's why whatever republican who leaked the story used that site to do it.

tell us... do they use the term 'high tech lynching' on stormfront?

:thup:
I've heard the censorship is actually pretty tight over there.
 

Similar threads

Forum List

Back
Top