Are McConnell and Graham bluffing on a quick end to an impeachment trial ??

yidnar

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2011
22,631
17,284
2,370
Inside your head.
they've both implied that the possible impeachment of Trump by the House is such a sham that it would be irresponsible to even have a serious trial in the Senate based on such an obvious bogus set of charges that are so partisan and political, that they would vote on impeachment put an end to this so called sham quickly if the House votes to impeach .....but will they ?? if that were to happen it would give fodder to the lying left and their left wing media comrades to say that Republicans are afraid of calling witnesses and having a trial ??? that they are covering for Trump ?? is that what the left wants ?? do dems really want Biden, Schiff, the whistle blower and others to be put under oath especially with the Durham investigation advancing into a criminal investigation ?? will the dems fall for the possible faint that the republicans in the Senate will shut impeachment down quickly ??? and is that what McConnell and Graham are hoping ??? and when and if the dems in the House do impeach the president they will not vote Quickly in the senate to put and end to it !! instead to the horror of the left the republican controlled Senate will indeed have a full trial and subpoena witnesses under oath and absolutely destroy the lefts credibility !! and i wouldnt be surprised if its Trump thats the master mind of this plan !! hes played the dems and the media like a fiddle for yrs ....are Trump and republican leaders secretly hoping the House votes to impeach ???
 
I personal think that the GOP should use Impeachment as a weapon to expose Corruption in The FBI and Democrat Party.
 
they've both implied that the possible impeachment of Trump by the House is such a sham that it would be irresponsible to even have a serious trial in the Senate based on such an obvious bogus set of charges that are so partisan and political, that they would vote on impeachment put an end to this so called sham quickly if the House votes to impeach .....but will they ?? if that were to happen it would give fodder to the lying left and their left wing media comrades to say that Republicans are afraid of calling witnesses and having a trial ??? that they are covering for Trump ?? is that what the left wants ?? do dems really want Biden, Schiff, the whistle blower and others to be put under oath especially with the Durham investigation advancing into a criminal investigation ?? will the dems fall for the possible faint that the republicans in the Senate will shut impeachment down quickly ??? and is that what McConnell and Graham are hoping ??? and when and if the dems in the House do impeach the president they will not vote Quickly in the senate to put and end to it !! instead to the horror of the left the republican controlled Senate will indeed have a full trial and subpoena witnesses under oath and absolutely destroy the lefts credibility !! and i wouldnt be surprised if its Trump thats the master mind of this plan !! hes played the dems and the media like a fiddle for yrs ....are Trump and republican leaders secretly hoping the House votes to impeach ???
Justice Roberts will put in place the federal rules of evidence and then rule on each piece the democrats wish to add. As each of their articles are torn to shreds and hearsay evidence discharged there will be nothing left to vote on. The Senate will vote to Acquit as there is no evidence of a crime as determined by the Constitution. It will be a stunning loss for democrats as they will never get to the point of calling any witness.

Justice Roberts has two potential avenues. One; Roberts can do summary judgment and send the impeachment letter back to the house to revisit and provide crimes. OR Two; Roberts can hand it to the Senate and have them vote to acquit on grounds of insufficient evidence of a crime. Either scenario would be a massive slap in the face to democrats..
 
dont you want an impeachment trial ??
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Kind of like your 3.5 year scam investigation and impeachment that started 19 min after inauguration when y'all said "let the impeachment begin"?
No, but thanks for the whiny question! Trials for impeachment only happen in the Senate. How odd that you guys are so obsessed with this topic, yet aren't in possession of the most basic of facts regarding it.
 
dont you want an impeachment trial ??
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Kind of like your 3.5 year scam investigation and impeachment that started 19 min after inauguration when y'all said "let the impeachment begin"?
No, but thanks for the whiny question!
Your a fucking loon that is dripping in hypocrisy.... What a loser...
 
dont you want an impeachment trial ??
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Kind of like your 3.5 year scam investigation and impeachment that started 19 min after inauguration when y'all said "let the impeachment begin"?
No, but thanks for the whiny question!
Your a fucking loon that is dripping in hypocrisy.... What a loser...
And the little bitch tantrums begin. It took you two posts.... personally, I would have bet the under on that one. Glad I didn't.
 
dont you want an impeachment trial ??
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Kind of like your 3.5 year scam investigation and impeachment that started 19 min after inauguration when y'all said "let the impeachment begin"?
No, but thanks for the whiny question!
Your a fucking loon that is dripping in hypocrisy.... What a loser...
And the little bitch tantrums begin. It took you two posts.... personally, I would have bet the under on that one. Glad I didn't.
Your child tantrums of "its ok if we do it but you cant" are so revealing...
 
they've both implied that the possible impeachment of Trump by the House is such a sham that it would be irresponsible to even have a serious trial in the Senate based on such an obvious bogus set of charges that are so partisan and political, that they would vote on impeachment put an end to this so called sham quickly if the House votes to impeach .....but will they ?? if that were to happen it would give fodder to the lying left and their left wing media comrades to say that Republicans are afraid of calling witnesses and having a trial ??? that they are covering for Trump ?? is that what the left wants ?? do dems really want Biden, Schiff, the whistle blower and others to be put under oath especially with the Durham investigation advancing into a criminal investigation ?? will the dems fall for the possible faint that the republicans in the Senate will shut impeachment down quickly ??? and is that what McConnell and Graham are hoping ??? and when and if the dems in the House do impeach the president they will not vote Quickly in the senate to put and end to it !! instead to the horror of the left the republican controlled Senate will indeed have a full trial and subpoena witnesses under oath and absolutely destroy the lefts credibility !! and i wouldnt be surprised if its Trump thats the master mind of this plan !! hes played the dems and the media like a fiddle for yrs ....are Trump and republican leaders secretly hoping the House votes to impeach ???
Justice Roberts will put in place the federal rules of evidence and then rule on each piece the democrats wish to add. As each of their articles are torn to shreds and hearsay evidence discharged there will be nothing left to vote on. The Senate will vote to Acquit as there is no evidence of a crime as determined by the Constitution. It will be a stunning loss for democrats as they will never get to the point of calling any witness.

Justice Roberts has two potential avenues. One; Roberts can do summary judgment and send the impeachment letter back to the house to revisit and provide crimes. OR Two; Roberts can hand it to the Senate and have them vote to acquit on grounds of insufficient evidence of a crime. Either scenario would be a massive slap in the face to democrats..

Add to that, according to Alan Dershowitz, that when the USSC took the Trump tax records case that obliterated the dems Article-2 for impeachment. That clearly showed the House that their subpoenas can be litrigated and do NOT have to be obeyed by the president. Nancy is just plain wrong when she called Trump's taking the House subpoenas to court "obstruction".
Here's hoping that Justice Roberts throws the impeachment case out without a trial.
That would be just too cool, and one for the history books.
 
dont you want an impeachment trial ??
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Kind of like your 3.5 year scam investigation and impeachment that started 19 min after inauguration when y'all said "let the impeachment begin"?
No, but thanks for the whiny question! Trials for impeachment only happen in the Senate. How odd that you guys are so obsessed with this topic, yet aren't in possession of the most basic of facts regarding it.
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
 
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Kind of like your 3.5 year scam investigation and impeachment that started 19 min after inauguration when y'all said "let the impeachment begin"?
No, but thanks for the whiny question!
Your a fucking loon that is dripping in hypocrisy.... What a loser...
And the little bitch tantrums begin. It took you two posts.... personally, I would have bet the under on that one. Glad I didn't.
Your child tantrums of "its ok if we do it but you cant" are so revealing...
Oops, you are confused again. Impeachment trials only happen in the Senate. As most non-retarded people know, the Republicans have the majority in the Senate. And for them to say they have already rendered their verdict before the trial begins is obviously unethical. No amount of bitchy crybabying on your part affects this obvious fact.
 
they've both implied that the possible impeachment of Trump by the House is such a sham that it would be irresponsible to even have a serious trial in the Senate based on such an obvious bogus set of charges that are so partisan and political, that they would vote on impeachment put an end to this so called sham quickly if the House votes to impeach .....but will they ?? if that were to happen it would give fodder to the lying left and their left wing media comrades to say that Republicans are afraid of calling witnesses and having a trial ??? that they are covering for Trump ?? is that what the left wants ?? do dems really want Biden, Schiff, the whistle blower and others to be put under oath especially with the Durham investigation advancing into a criminal investigation ?? will the dems fall for the possible faint that the republicans in the Senate will shut impeachment down quickly ??? and is that what McConnell and Graham are hoping ??? and when and if the dems in the House do impeach the president they will not vote Quickly in the senate to put and end to it !! instead to the horror of the left the republican controlled Senate will indeed have a full trial and subpoena witnesses under oath and absolutely destroy the lefts credibility !! and i wouldnt be surprised if its Trump thats the master mind of this plan !! hes played the dems and the media like a fiddle for yrs ....are Trump and republican leaders secretly hoping the House votes to impeach ???
Justice Roberts will put in place the federal rules of evidence and then rule on each piece the democrats wish to add. As each of their articles are torn to shreds and hearsay evidence discharged there will be nothing left to vote on. The Senate will vote to Acquit as there is no evidence of a crime as determined by the Constitution. It will be a stunning loss for democrats as they will never get to the point of calling any witness.

Justice Roberts has two potential avenues. One; Roberts can do summary judgment and send the impeachment letter back to the house to revisit and provide crimes. OR Two; Roberts can hand it to the Senate and have them vote to acquit on grounds of insufficient evidence of a crime. Either scenario would be a massive slap in the face to democrats..

Add to that, according to Alan Dershowitz, that when the USSC took the Trump tax records case that obliterated the dems Article-2 for impeachment. That clearly showed the House that their subpoenas can be litrigated and do NOT have to be obeyed by the president. Nancy is just plain wrong when she called Trump's taking the House subpoenas to court "obstruction".
Here's hoping that Justice Roberts throws the impeachment case out without a trial.
That would be just too cool, and one for the history books.
Throwing it out as baseless, without a vote, would be funny as hell! I would love to see a summary judgment in favor of the president and a rebuke letter sent to the house publically for their abuse of power. That would be a devastating blow to democrats. I guess there are three options... Who Knew?
 
dont you want an impeachment trial ??
"Trial"...?

Not an accurate description, when the jury renders their verdict before it even begins.
Like the Democrats did with their kangaroo court, beginning when Trump won the election???
No, sorry, but thanks for asking!
Then maybe the Republicans can simply state that someone they don't know told them that he heard Trump was innocent, and vote for acquittal...

After all, that would be CONCLUSIVE PROOF, according to the Democrats!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top