Are liberals becoming terrorists?

[NewGuy]

DK, you are scaring me.

Are we starting to think more alike?

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by NewGuy
DK, you are scaring me.

Are we starting to think more alike?

no reason to be scared my constitutionalist friend. We've always thought alike on a number of issues, we're just completely different on others.

 

[KLSuddeth]

gee, its a world gone mad.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
no reason to be scared my constitutionalist friend. We've always thought alike on a number of issues, we're just completely different on others.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
any of them that allow corporations to hire and maintain illegals.
any of them that allow corporations to pay a fine of 50% from whatever ill gotten gains they made off a criminal action.

note that this applies to both democrats and republicans so if you were trying to point out a partisanship, you would be wrong.



when we pacify ourselves with the notion of justice being served by allowing an individual, or corporation, to pay only a percentage of ill gotten gains through a fine, then we're not enforcing the law, we're just pointing our finger and saying 'don't get caught next time'.

enforce the corporate laws or its not socialism we'll be facing, but fascism.

They are being enforced. Nothing's 100%. Sadly, utopia is not really an option.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
DK, you are scaring me.

Are we starting to think more alike?

I don't know, I've always questioned your agenda here on the site. Yes, revolution is the only answer. Sounds like commie talk to me. Only a commie would want to revolt against the government providing the most rights to it's citizens in human history.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I don't know, I've always questioned your agenda here on the site. Yes, revolution is the only answer. Sounds like commie talk to me. Only a commie would want to revolt against the government providing the most rights to it's citizens in human history.

I guess you refer to our founders as well.

Nice talk from a "conservative".

Methinks you have rectal cranial inversion regarding history and government.

If you think I am a "commie" maybe you ought to define it for us.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
I guess you refer tou our founders as well.

They were really being oppressed. We have a lot of freedoms,

Nice talk from a "conservative".

It's odd you choose a period of war to start with your revolutionary bullshit. Libs always start talking that way when they're out of power. When in power, they're all about spreading government and government dependancy. You're only functioning to split the conservative vote between the logical choice and some nut.

Methinks you have rectal cranial inversion regarding history and government.

If you think I am a "commie" maybe you ought to define it for us.

Methinks you're wrong.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
They were really being oppressed. We have a lot of freedoms,

It's odd you choose a period of war to start with your revolutionary bullshit. Libs always start talking that way when they're out of power. When in power, they're all about spreading government and government dependancy. You're only functioning to split the conservative vote between the logical choice and some nut.


Methinks you're wrong.

I think you have shown what a phoney you are.

People are "Commies" when they want a revolution because of abuse of power and REPUBLICANS are in office.

When the DEMOCRATS are in office, it is ok.

You are a two-faced socialist by your own definition of moral relativity.

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
They were really being oppressed. We have a lot of freedoms,

obviously alot more than the constitution and bill of rights ever intended

It's odd you choose a period of war to start with your revolutionary bullshit. Libs always start talking that way when they're out of power. When in power, they're all about spreading government and government dependancy. You're only functioning to split the conservative vote between the logical choice and some nut.

I'm not surprised that you would consider all negativity towards the republican party to be anything other than 'liberal'. why is it you can only think in binary?

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
why is it you can only think in binary?

Only 2 fingers, maybe?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
I think you have shown what a phoney you are.

People are "Commies" when they want a revolution because of abuse of power and REPUBLICANS are in office.

When the DEMOCRATS are in office, it is ok.

You are a two-faced socialist by your own definition of moral relativity.

No. i'm quite authentic.


Libs talk of revolution even when they're free, to subjugate others to their mob rule. Conservatives employ revolution to break from the hold of mob rule. See the difference? Probably not.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
No. i'm quite authentic.


Libs talk of revolution even when they're free, to subjugate others to their mob rule. Conservatives employ revolution to break from the hold of mob rule. See the difference? Probably not.

Constitutionalists talk of revolution when whoever is in power is corrupt and holding a nation hostage by keeping the Constitution in suspension.

You wouldn't understand that.

You disregard rules in favor of feel good social labels.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
Constitutionalists talk of revolution when whoever is in power is corrupt and holding a nation hostage by keeping the Constitution in suspension.

You wouldn't understand that.

You disregard rules in favor of feel good social labels.

Our constitution is hardly in suspension. You know what? Screw the gitmo detainees!

And you have the inability to choose the proper battle at the proper time. Your misplaced focus is alarming.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Our constitution is hardly in suspension. You know what? Screw the gitmo detainees!

And you have the inability to choose the proper battle at the proper time. Your misplaced focus is alarming.

I fight the battle WHENEVER and WHEREVER it presents its self.

You DO like your social labels. You didn't even adress that point.

The root word of socialism is social.

Have a nice day.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
I fight the battle WHENEVER and WHEREVER it presents its self.

You DO like your social labels. You didn't even adress that point.

The root word of socialism is social.

Have a nice day.

You need to prioritize; this administration is a friend of the American people. The root word of jackass is ass. Go forth and prosper!

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
You need to prioritize; this administration is a friend of the American people. The root word of jackass is ass. Go forth and prosper!

My prorities must dictate higher level than yours.

I place corruption of our Constitutional structure above pretty touchy feely party labels and feel good tax breaks.

I dont care who is in which office. Evil is evil.

The time is never wrong to right wrongs.

The root word of jackass IS ass. You are correct.

Try getting off of yours and fixing what is wrong instead of playing with the rebate cheque you have been purchased with.

:cof:

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
My prorities must dictate higher level than yours.

Yes. They must.

I place corruption of our Constitutional structure above pretty touchy feely party labels and feel good tax breaks.

See. From my perspective you place high faluting, purist notions of constitutional strictness, above practical political considerations.

I dont care who is in which office. Evil is evil.

I agree. Bush ain't evil.

The time is never wrong to right wrongs.

During a war is not the time to tear down our government. There are wrong times for some things.

The root word of jackass IS ass. You are correct.

Try getting off of yours and fixing what is wrong instead of playing with the rebate cheque you have been purchased with.

:cof:

What is wrong newguy? Police asking for ID rampantly? The refusal of others to acknowledge that "THis is a christian nation"?

 

[NewGuy]

See. From my perspective you place high faluting, purist notions of constitutional strictness, above practical political considerations.

In other words, the law is only the law when RWA wants it to be.

Moral relativity again.

-The basis of socialism.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Originally posted by NewGuy
In other words, the law is only the law when RWA wants it to be.

Moral relativity again.

-The basis of socialism.

No. i'm saying the degree to which we've varied from the constitution is not too alarming to me at this point. Sue me.