Are liberal children more intelligent?

I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.

^^^^^^

thank you for proving the o/p's point.

there are many smart conservatives... i doubt anyone would say that antonin scalia or william f buckley is stupid.

there are many smart liberals... i doubt anyone would say that bill clinton or elizabeth warren is stupid.

and saying this president is stupid would be total hackery but that's a different subject.

however, if children are being taught we're socialist, or that there's no such thing as evolution or that the world is 6000 years old or that the president is "destroying the country", then they're uneducated and ignorant like the people teaching them, not necessarily stupid.
 
Last edited:
You'll notice that Chrissy hasn't stayed to defend his little "dump".

It is his M.O.

Post and run (for the nearest skirt he can get under that will hide and protect him).
 
I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.

IF you subtract all socialism from America, what would you have left?
 
I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.

^^^^^^

thank you for proving the o/p's point.

there are many smart conservatives... i doubt anyone would say that antonin scalia or william f buckley is stupid.

there are many smart liberals... i doubt anyone would say that bill clinton or elizabeth warren is stupid.

and saying this president is stupid would be total hackery but that's a different subject.

however, if children are being taught we're socialist, or that there's no such thing as evolution or that the world is 6000 years old or that the president is "destroying the country", then they're uneducated and ignorant like the people teaching them, not necessarily stupid.

You can do a lot better than Elizabeth Warren for smart liberals.
 
The majority of Barack Obama's most loyal demographic does not even graduate from High School.

Fail.

Actually, the REALITY is that Obama got the votes of well educated Americans, AND the poor. This study, along with numerous other "studies" cited here, proves NOTHING. Unless the children tested are followed for the next 30-50 YEARS, nothing can be drawn about future political beliefs.

Educated doesn't mean intelligent. Some liberal professors are simply indoctrinating students and not making them smarter. It all depends on who educated them and what they taught.
 
Yes they are, that's why people usually start out liberal and evolve to Conservative. You pretty much never hear someone shift from Conservative to liberal.

Now I'm talkin real conservative, not the neocon liberal lites like Mitt/Bush and a bunch of the wanabes on this very boards.

In fact most liberals I know are mostly Conservative it's just they can't stand the moron religious right and have fallin into the trap of thinking that makes them Liberal. Most liberals want more freedom and things like a balanced budget, low taxes and believe in the constitution.
 
There is a huge amount of info out there that indicates that liberals are more open minded and certainly tend to be better educated - for the simple reason that they value education.

The right itself is causing this. Its the right who says they don't want "elitist" educations, don't want schools, don't want well educated or well paid teachers.

The biggest problem with the uneducated right is that they not only vote, they have kids. They want kids in the US to have inferior educations. Its the right who wants our kids to cleans schools and pick produce just as its the right who want other countries to be better educated than our own kids. (I recently posted a link to an article stating that China graduates more science majors than the US graduates all kids. Typically, the rw's poo-poo'ed it.)

The rw's can change this IF THEY WANT TO.

Read the posts here ... They don't want to. They actually take great pride in not being university or college educated and want no part of that "elitist" stuff.

How many recent college graduates are out of work? There are many places to put blame on this, but that doesn't change the problem

Andrew Sum: The Nation's Recent College Graduates Face Significant Labor Market Problems

The cost of education is rising every year. My wife owes $16,000 dollars in student loans, that's after we've paid the monthly bill for 4 years, with very little interest. She received several scholarships and grants. I owe $10,000 in student loans. That is also very low interest and I've paid on those for 3 years. That's not counting what the G.I Bill paid. Books each semester can easily cost over 1,000 alone. I had a scince book once that when new was over $320, that's nothing more than gouging.

When a doctor graduates med school, some owe up to 200k in loans and after paying for those loans for the first 8 years of their career, make around the same as a waiter. Education costs are crippling, and it can cause elitism. When I graduated high school I had no hope of going to college. I had always been poor, clothes from thrift stores, shoes from wherever. After the military I was able to attend, but it didn't pay for everything.

Almost every college class I took, with the exception of math, was liberal biased. My wife had the same experience at a different university. There is a problem with this. If your opinion was different inside that classroom, it was best to keep it to yourself. This is not how people should be educated. No critical thinking skills are taught. Memorize, memorize... clear those facts. Memorize, memorize. Repeat.
 
one of the leaders of the tea party here in burley Idaho son is the valedictorian of his class
and his next door cousin won the car tech contest in boise which awards a 44000 dollar schollie . He will be competing in Minnesota at the national contest.

sorta blows that pommies theory out the window

What's the margin of error on your sample size of one?
 
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?

Example: You believe this "study."
 
Being a liberal, I encouraged my kids to challenge me, and hoped they'd learn to think for themselves. Sitting around the dinner table, nothing was out of bounds. Religion, politics, sexuality, pop culture, whatever, was discussed with respect. I never demanded that my kids held dogmatic beliefs. I wanted them to know how to think, and learn how to disagree with respect.

Did that make them more intelligent than those who demand dogmatic rigor? I don't know, but I did what I can. It's not like I'm Alan Keyes, who threw his 17 year old daughter out of the house because she found her sexual identity was homosexual.
 
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?

Example: You believe this "study."

Did you find your press release yet, that Lauber's family claimed he wasn't gay? Or are you just another right wing liar?
 
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?

Example: You believe this "study."

Did you find your press release yet, that Lauber's family claimed he wasn't gay? Or are you just another right wing liar?

So You are going to believe the Washington post over the family?

This is a sign of "liberal intelligence"?
 
Being a liberal, I encouraged my kids to challenge me, and hoped they'd learn to think for themselves. Sitting around the dinner table, nothing was out of bounds. Religion, politics, sexuality, pop culture, whatever, was discussed with respect. I never demanded that my kids held dogmatic beliefs. I wanted them to know how to think, and learn how to disagree with respect.

Did that make them more intelligent than those who demand dogmatic rigor? I don't know, but I did what I can. It's not like I'm Alan Keyes, who threw his 17 year old daughter out of the house because she found her sexual identity was homosexual.

If there is one thing that I can give to liberals is that they are open to ideas, but this in and of itself can be a dogma. When I first moved to San Francisco from the South, everyone would say stuff like "people are so open minded and accepting here", until you say you aren't a liberal and then they become just as dogmatic as the most staunch conservative.....
 
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?

Example: You believe this "study."

Did you find your press release yet, that Lauber's family claimed he wasn't gay? Or are you just another right wing liar?

So You are going to believe the Washington post over the family?

This is a sign of "liberal intelligence"?

You made the claim that the family did a press release claiming he wasn't gay. Where is it? I think you're just a liar. This is a sign of right wing dishonesty.
 

Forum List

Back
Top