Trying to tie intelligence to a persons political views is what is really stupid all that is needed to know this is common sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.
I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.
I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.
IF you subtract all socialism from America, what would you have left?
I guess you better define liberal. Socialism, which has failed so many times in the past, doesn't work and any intelligent person knows that eventually you run out of other peoples' money.
^^^^^^
thank you for proving the o/p's point.
there are many smart conservatives... i doubt anyone would say that antonin scalia or william f buckley is stupid.
there are many smart liberals... i doubt anyone would say that bill clinton or elizabeth warren is stupid.
and saying this president is stupid would be total hackery but that's a different subject.
however, if children are being taught we're socialist, or that there's no such thing as evolution or that the world is 6000 years old or that the president is "destroying the country", then they're uneducated and ignorant like the people teaching them, not necessarily stupid.
The majority of Barack Obama's most loyal demographic does not even graduate from High School.
Fail.
Actually, the REALITY is that Obama got the votes of well educated Americans, AND the poor. This study, along with numerous other "studies" cited here, proves NOTHING. Unless the children tested are followed for the next 30-50 YEARS, nothing can be drawn about future political beliefs.
Children raised by liberal parents are probably smarter because their parents have a great imagination.
There is a huge amount of info out there that indicates that liberals are more open minded and certainly tend to be better educated - for the simple reason that they value education.
The right itself is causing this. Its the right who says they don't want "elitist" educations, don't want schools, don't want well educated or well paid teachers.
The biggest problem with the uneducated right is that they not only vote, they have kids. They want kids in the US to have inferior educations. Its the right who wants our kids to cleans schools and pick produce just as its the right who want other countries to be better educated than our own kids. (I recently posted a link to an article stating that China graduates more science majors than the US graduates all kids. Typically, the rw's poo-poo'ed it.)
The rw's can change this IF THEY WANT TO.
Read the posts here ... They don't want to. They actually take great pride in not being university or college educated and want no part of that "elitist" stuff.
one of the leaders of the tea party here in burley Idaho son is the valedictorian of his class
and his next door cousin won the car tech contest in boise which awards a 44000 dollar schollie . He will be competing in Minnesota at the national contest.
sorta blows that pommies theory out the window
The majority of Barack Obama's most loyal demographic does not even graduate from High School.
Fail.
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?
Example: You believe this "study."
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?
Example: You believe this "study."
Did you find your press release yet, that Lauber's family claimed he wasn't gay? Or are you just another right wing liar?
Being a liberal, I encouraged my kids to challenge me, and hoped they'd learn to think for themselves. Sitting around the dinner table, nothing was out of bounds. Religion, politics, sexuality, pop culture, whatever, was discussed with respect. I never demanded that my kids held dogmatic beliefs. I wanted them to know how to think, and learn how to disagree with respect.
Did that make them more intelligent than those who demand dogmatic rigor? I don't know, but I did what I can. It's not like I'm Alan Keyes, who threw his 17 year old daughter out of the house because she found her sexual identity was homosexual.
So what your saying is that intelligent people grow up to believe absolutely nonsense like you Chris?
Example: You believe this "study."
Did you find your press release yet, that Lauber's family claimed he wasn't gay? Or are you just another right wing liar?
So You are going to believe the Washington post over the family?
This is a sign of "liberal intelligence"?