Arctic Temps 2°-6°C Warmer Than Today With 4.5 Fewer Months Of Sea Ice Coverage 2,000 Years Ago

[miketx]

Nobody knows jack shit about the ice 2000 years ago.
9000 years, LMAO!

Actually there are sufficient evidence, the main problem is RESOLUTION of the data as it is all PROXY based data, which depending on the chosen proxy, have different measured resolution levels to base their research on.

That is why errors bars usually get bigger the further into the past you go.

There is no data for 2000 years ago.

There is data going back MILLIONS of years,

BullSHIT!

I never said they are instrumental data, it is PROXY data which we have a lot of.

Total bullshit.

 

[skookerasbil]

Over the past 10 years people have learned much about things the "climate science" industry never wanted you to know about, like MWP. It's one of the reasons that since 2006 people have become less and less interested in climate change. CNN doesn't even run stories on climate change anymore due to lack of Interest. Now you have stories like this that are getting out there thus kicking snow in the face of the climate crusaders.

 

[Old Rocks]

Warmists focus on a short time frame, usually 1979 onward to whine about low sea ice cover in the Arctic, which is why they look foolish when the REST of the Holocene gets brought up.

No Tricks Zone

Arctic Temps 2°-6°C Warmer Than Today With 4.5 Fewer Months Of Sea Ice Coverage 2,000 Years Ago

By Kenneth Richard on 26. April 2018

EXCERPT:

Arctic Sea Ice Extent Higher During 1954-2001
Than Almost Any Period In The Last 9,000 Years

During the Roman Warm Period ~2,000 years ago, sea levels were significantly higher than they are now. Modern coastlines are 2 miles down from where they were during the Roman invasion of Britain in 43 AD, strongly implying that surface air temperatures were much warmer ~2,000 years ago compared to today.

LINK

Nobody knows jack shit about the ice 2000 years ago.
9000 years, LMAO!

Actually there are sufficient evidence, the main problem is RESOLUTION of the data as it is all PROXY based data, which depending on the chosen proxy, have different measured resolution levels to base their research on.

That is why errors bars usually get bigger the further into the past you go.

There is no data for 2000 years ago.

And there is no evidence from your posts that your IQ is above room temperature. There is plenty of evidence as to sea levels and ice extent many tens of thousands of years in the past. Exactly as Tommy says, the error bars get a bit larger the further one goes into the past. However, even that is not as big of a problem as it seems. Since there are several proxies for each of these measurements, and each has an error bar that tends to be biased one way or the other, combining them narrows the total error bar. We have learned a lot in the past 50 years that I have been following this debate concerning a warming world and the causes of that warming.