Arctic Report Card: Update for 2012

[Trakar]

Published on Dec 5, 2012
Arctic Report Card: Update for 2012 - Tracking recent environmental changes, with 20 essays on different aspects of the environment, by a international team of 141 scientists from 15 different countries, with an independent peer-review organized by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme of the Arctic Council. More information and PDF of entire report at http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=O5h02Yc6lfA]Arctic Report Card 2012 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[ScienceRocks]

I don't like going against the scienific field. I'm a supporter of it but I'm someone that would like to see that slope line upwards somemore before being convinced!

 

[Trakar]

I don't like going against the scienific field. I'm a supporter of it but I'm someone that would like to see that slope line upwards somemore before being convinced!

Everyone has their own levels of personal understanding and acceptability on such issues, so long as you are basing your considerations and understandings of the evidences upon the published mainstream science, I see no reason that you shouldn't be encouraged to keep researching and investigating the issue until you feel confident in your own personal assessments. Good researches, please let me know if there is anything I can do to assist you in your efforts.

 

[westwall]

Published on Dec 5, 2012
Arctic Report Card: Update for 2012 - Tracking recent environmental changes, with 20 essays on different aspects of the environment, by a international team of 141 scientists from 15 different countries, with an independent peer-review organized by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme of the Arctic Council. More information and PDF of entire report at http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard

Arctic Report Card 2012 - YouTube

I love the statement "there were varied impacts on marine and terrestrial wildlife" implying that it was bad, bad, bad for the life up there, when in fact the opposite was true.

Charlatans...

 

[Old Rocks]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdAhIEWqHLc&feature=player_embedded]Sagan Lecture: B31H. The Race to Understand a Changing Planet - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Old Rocks]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAP6zkgUQY8&feature=player_embedded]B33G. Impacts of Extreme Climate Events and Disturbances on Carbon Dynamics I - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Old Rocks]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2Zznnse1jIM]C41D.* Dust and Black Carbon in the Cryosphere I - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Old Rocks]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FydJV_VKQM&feature=player_embedded]C43E. Climate Change and Cryospheric Systems I - YouTube[/ame]

Related real science from real scientists, not sputtering internet trolls.

And so much more here.

Video On-Demand Lectures and Sessions - AGU Fall Meeting 2012

 

[Trakar]

I love the statement "there were varied impacts on marine and terrestrial wildlife" implying that it was bad, bad, bad for the life up there, when in fact the opposite was true.

Charlatans...

What specific aspect of "there were varied impacts on marine and terrestrial wildlife" implies to you that changes were "bad, bad, bad for life up there?"