Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Poor confused Frank, humiliating himself again by failing to understand the difference between how soot works on sea ice vs. land ice.
At the more southern latitudes where the soot-from-China falls, the sea ice melts out every year. The soot has no chance to build up. In the more northern latitudes, the sea ice is tumbling about, so there's no soot build up on the surface there either. Soot means jack for sea ice melt.
Greenland and other land-based ice-sheets, that's another story. That's further south, the glacial ice doesn't tumble. Over the years, the soot does build up on the ice pack and increases the melt. Scientists have only known this since forever. Good of Frank to join the party.
Dark Snow Project
meaning that the sunlight-absorbing soot likely caused greater melting of the Arctic ice cap during the winter."
And just what made that ocean warmer?
I'm a little foggy on the method by which atmospheric CO2 warmed the ocean 900M down. Can you enlighten me?
OK moron, why has the top 800M not warmed?
IN order for any warming to happen below 200M the upper levels must warm by a factor of 10X...
and there it is again!!!! Just as I stated!!!OK moron, why has the top 800M not warmed?
It has warmed. Hence the all-time record high sea surface temperatures.
2014 - The Highest Global Mean Sea Surface Temperatures Ever Recorded - SciTech Daily
So how is it you manage to get the basics so completely wrong every time? You're like a virtuoso at failing.
IN order for any warming to happen below 200M the upper levels must warm by a factor of 10X...
No. You're babbling your cult stupidity again.
Poor confused Frank, humiliating himself again by failing to understand the difference between how soot works on sea ice vs. land ice.
At the more southern latitudes where the soot-from-China falls, the sea ice melts out every year. The soot has no chance to build up. In the more northern latitudes, the sea ice is tumbling about, so there's no soot build up on the surface there either. Soot means jack for sea ice melt.
Greenland and other land-based ice-sheets, that's another story. That's further south, the glacial ice doesn't tumble. Over the years, the soot does build up on the ice pack and increases the melt. Scientists have only known this since forever. Good of Frank to join the party.
Dark Snow Project
meaning that the sunlight-absorbing soot likely caused greater melting of the Arctic ice cap during the winter."
So according to Frank's kook theory here, the winter sunlight in the arctic is melting the ice.
Yep, he actually put those words together. Winter. Sunlight. Arctic. Is there anyone not laughing out loud now?
Who wants to break the news to poor addled Frank? You know, that in the winter, there is no sunlight in the arctic.
frank,Poor confused Frank, humiliating himself again by failing to understand the difference between how soot works on sea ice vs. land ice.
At the more southern latitudes where the soot-from-China falls, the sea ice melts out every year. The soot has no chance to build up. In the more northern latitudes, the sea ice is tumbling about, so there's no soot build up on the surface there either. Soot means jack for sea ice melt.
Greenland and other land-based ice-sheets, that's another story. That's further south, the glacial ice doesn't tumble. Over the years, the soot does build up on the ice pack and increases the melt. Scientists have only known this since forever. Good of Frank to join the party.
Dark Snow Project
meaning that the sunlight-absorbing soot likely caused greater melting of the Arctic ice cap during the winter."
So according to Frank's kook theory here, the winter sunlight in the arctic is melting the ice.
Yep, he actually put those words together. Winter. Sunlight. Arctic. Is there anyone not laughing out loud now?
Who wants to break the news to poor addled Frank? You know, that in the winter, there is no sunlight in the arctic.
It's an article in Discovery you stupid Twat, that highlights how the AGWCult ignored reality in their models
It's an article in Discovery you stupid Twat, that highlights how the AGWCult ignored reality in their models
It's an article in Discovery you stupid Twat, that highlights how the AGWCult ignored reality in their models
So you're sticking to your claim that the winter sun is melting the Arctic, even though the Arctic barely sees any sun in the winter.
Good luck with that.
Also, it's "Discover Magazine", not "Discovery." And it's not a science journal. And nobody knows what the article actually said, since it's paywalled. Where did you copy your little excerpt from?
