AP incorrectly claims scientists praise Gore's movie

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Little-Acorn, Jun 28, 2006.

  1. Little-Acorn
    Offline

    Little-Acorn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,345
    Thanks Received:
    2,021
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Ratings:
    +5,841
    Even seven-year-olds know better then to tell an obvious lie - it's far too easy to get caught. Looks like the AP has a lot of learnin' to do, to get up to that level.

    -------------------------------

    http://www.epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=257909

    AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE’S MOVIE

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    June 27, 2006

    The June 27, 2006 Associated Press (AP) article titled “Scientists OK Gore’s Movie for Accuracy” by Seth Borenstein raises some serious questions about AP’s bias and methodology.

    AP chose to ignore the scores of scientists who have harshly criticized the science presented in former Vice President Al Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth.”

    The AP article quotes Robert Correll, the chairman of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment group. It appears from the article that Correll has a personal relationship with Gore, having viewed the film at a private screening at the invitation of the former Vice President. In addition, Correll’s reported links as an “affiliate” of a Washington, D.C.-based consulting firm that provides “expert testimony” in trials and his reported sponsorship by the left-leaning Packard Foundation, were not disclosed by AP. See http://www.junkscience.com/feb06.htm

    The AP also chose to ignore Gore’s reliance on the now-discredited “hockey stick” by Dr. Michael Mann, which claims that temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere remained relatively stable over 900 years, then spiked upward in the 20th century, and that the 1990’s were the warmest decade in at least 1000 years. Last week’s National Academy of Sciences report dispelled Mann’s often cited claims by reaffirming the existence of both the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age. See Senator Inhofe’s statement on the broken “Hockey Stick.” (http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=257697 )

    Gore’s claim that global warming is causing the snows of Mt. Kilimanjaro to disappear has also been debunked by scientific reports. For example, a 2004 study in the journal Nature makes clear that Kilimanjaro is experiencing less snowfall because there’s less moisture in the air due to deforestation around Kilimanjaro.

    Here is a sampling of the views of some of the scientific critics of Gore:

    Professor Bob Carter, of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University in Australia, on Gore’s film:

    "Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."

    "The man is an embarrassment to US science and its many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science." – Bob Carter as quoted in the Canadian Free Press, June 12, 2006

    Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT, wrote:

    “A general characteristic of Mr. Gore's approach is to assiduously ignore the fact that the earth and its climate are dynamic; they are always changing even without any external forcing. To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is much worse.” - Lindzen wrote in an op-ed in the June 26, 2006 Wall Street Journal


    (Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
     
  2. acludem
    Offline

    acludem VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,500
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Missouri
    Ratings:
    +69
    Speaking of accuracy and bias...where do the words "All Scientists Praise Al Gore's Movie" appear anywhere in the AP article? I couldn't find them, which means unless someone else can, this renders this author's article as pure bullshit.

    I read the AP story, there was a group of scientists that praised Al's movie, the article was a short blurb about their report. It never said there wasn't a debate. It said that this particular group of scientists praised the movie. Where's the so-called bias?

    acludem
     
  3. Dr Grump
    Offline

    Dr Grump Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19,284
    Thanks Received:
    3,051
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    From the Back of Beyond
    Ratings:
    +4,227
    And considering the dude Bob Carter is a geologist, not a climatologist....
     
  4. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,894
    Thanks Received:
    2,071
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,782
    And considering the history of the world's climate is in rocks, not the sky.
     
  5. Dr Grump
    Offline

    Dr Grump Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19,284
    Thanks Received:
    3,051
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    From the Back of Beyond
    Ratings:
    +4,227
    It's in both. And that still doesn't make Carter a climatologist - you know, the folk who specialise in the, er, climate...:shocked:
     
  6. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,552
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,428
    I'm also kind of wondering who these other "scientists" are who don't think the vast majority of the scientific community is correct. You know, sometimes there's a little confusion between real science and science bought and paid for by Exxon/Mobil. :beer:
     
  7. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,894
    Thanks Received:
    2,071
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,782
    Its rediculous to suggest a geologist doesn't know anything about the history of climate and you know it. You're both just trying to debunk the point of the article. Have you even seen Al Gore's book? Its a fucking joke. Putting pics from the 1920s next to pics of today doesn't prove jack shit. I'm sure his movie is just an animated version of the same crap.
     
  8. Dr Grump
    Offline

    Dr Grump Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19,284
    Thanks Received:
    3,051
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    From the Back of Beyond
    Ratings:
    +4,227
    I'd still take the word of climatologists over a geologist...
     
  9. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Liberals would believe Pinnochio sporting a 10 foot nose if he said something they wanted to hear.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Oh yeah ... you mean like AL Gore?:dev3:
     

Share This Page