Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Pfft... we are NOT number 2 polluter in the world. Get your facts straight.The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
I know we are doing things--I am talking to the jamokes on this thread who want to do nothing.Why do you assume we are doing nothing? .The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Do females fart more than males?What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Declaring that couples cannot have female babies?
Which of course is flat out lie. Nobody is for doing nothing.I know we are doing things--I am talking to the jamokes on this thread who want to do nothing.Why do you assume we are doing nothing? .The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Trump and his deregulation seems to be unravelling some of those efforts, though. So we need to pay attention.
Well..... Yeah.To say nothing of McDonalds.That's pretty much going to kill the International Tourist Business
MacDonalds uses airplanes?
No.Do females fart more than males?What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Declaring that couples cannot have female babies?
I disagree that the posters here are interested in doing something. But there's no sense quibbling about it.Which of course is flat out lie. Nobody is for doing nothing.I know we are doing things--I am talking to the jamokes on this thread who want to do nothing.Why do you assume we are doing nothing? .The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Trump and his deregulation seems to be unravelling some of those efforts, though. So we need to pay attention.
Mud, what has this got to do with the topic?No.Do females fart more than males?What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Declaring that couples cannot have female babies?
China doesn't have an issue with males. They need them. As workers and for their military.
Females are a different story, because without women you get no babies. Population control.
You are chasing a mirage whose purpose is not improvement of man's existance but for his enslavement. Tech is always improving in desire to outsell other guy. My brothers new HVAC system is twice as efficient as my 25 yr old one. As AI comes online I think it will continue to help discover means if efficiency. How many such improvements will go undiscovered if govt mandates sidetrack capital into inefficiencyI disagree that the posters here are interested in doing something. But there's no sense quibbling about it.Which of course is flat out lie. Nobody is for doing nothing.I know we are doing things--I am talking to the jamokes on this thread who want to do nothing.Why do you assume we are doing nothing? .The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Trump and his deregulation seems to be unravelling some of those efforts, though. So we need to pay attention.
So as long as you're talking to me, what do YOU want to do to reduce global warming, quickly and effectively?
Everything.Mud, what has this got to do with the topic?No.Do females fart more than males?What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Declaring that couples cannot have female babies?
China doesn't have an issue with males. They need them. As workers and for their military.
Females are a different story, because without women you get no babies. Population control.
Do females fart more than males?What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Declaring that couples cannot have female babies?
This is the face of Socialism....promising the world and delivering nothing but starvation and death. Even Charles Manson had avid fans, BTW.
Ocasio-Cortez: Fixing Global Warming Requires ‘Massive Government Intervention’
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she has no qualms about acknowledging a so-called “Green New Deal” will mean unprecedented governmental intrusion into the private sector. Appearing on NPR, she was asked if she’s prepared to tell Americans outright that her plans involve “massive government intervention.”
“As you know, congresswoman, one reason that people are politically conservative are skeptical of efforts to combat climate change is that it sounds to them like it requires massive government intervention, which they just don’t like,” Steve Inskeep asked. “Are you prepared to put on that table that, ‘Yes actually they’re right, what this requires is massive government intervention’?”
“It does, it does, yeah, I have no problem saying that,” Ocasio-Cortez quickly replied. “Why? Because we have tried their approach for 40 years. For 40 years we have tried to let the private sector take care of this. They said, ‘We got this, we can do this, the forces of the market are going to force us to innovate.’”
“Except,” she continued, “for the fact that there’s a little thing in economics called externalities. And what that means is that a corporation can dump pollution in the river and they don’t have to pay, but taxpayers have to pay.”
Despite her Green New Deal including plans to remake “every” building in the United States, impose Medicare-for-All, as well as a universal basic income, Ocasio-Cortez said her proposals are small compared to the crisis the world faces. [Her office posted an updated outline of the plan today.]
"Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us," she told NPR.
Ocasio-Cortez also suggested there are ways to pay for her plans besides taxes, although she did not specify what.
“It is just certainly a lot of money,” Inskeep said. “You don’t specify where it’s going to come from other than saying it will all pay for itself.”
“Yeah, I think the first move we need to do is kind of break the mistaken idea that taxes pay for 100 percent of government expenditure,” Ocasio-Cortez answered. “It’s just not how government expenditure works. We can recoup costs, but oftentimes you look at, for example, the GOP tax cut which I think was an irresponsible use of government expenditure, but government projects are often financed by a combination of taxes, deficit spending and other kinds of investments, you know, bonds and so on.”
“Well, I get that, but deficit spending is borrowing money that has to be paid back eventually through taxes,” Inskeep reminded the freshman lawmaker.
“Yeah, and I think — I think that is always the crux of it,” she said. “So when we decide to go into the realm of deficit spending, we have to do so responsibly. We ask is this an investment or is this actually going to pay for itself?”
The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
This is the face of Socialism....promising the world and delivering nothing but starvation and death. Even Charles Manson had avid fans, BTW.
Ocasio-Cortez: Fixing Global Warming Requires ‘Massive Government Intervention’
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she has no qualms about acknowledging a so-called “Green New Deal” will mean unprecedented governmental intrusion into the private sector. Appearing on NPR, she was asked if she’s prepared to tell Americans outright that her plans involve “massive government intervention.”
“As you know, congresswoman, one reason that people are politically conservative are skeptical of efforts to combat climate change is that it sounds to them like it requires massive government intervention, which they just don’t like,” Steve Inskeep asked. “Are you prepared to put on that table that, ‘Yes actually they’re right, what this requires is massive government intervention’?”
“It does, it does, yeah, I have no problem saying that,” Ocasio-Cortez quickly replied. “Why? Because we have tried their approach for 40 years. For 40 years we have tried to let the private sector take care of this. They said, ‘We got this, we can do this, the forces of the market are going to force us to innovate.’”
“Except,” she continued, “for the fact that there’s a little thing in economics called externalities. And what that means is that a corporation can dump pollution in the river and they don’t have to pay, but taxpayers have to pay.”
Despite her Green New Deal including plans to remake “every” building in the United States, impose Medicare-for-All, as well as a universal basic income, Ocasio-Cortez said her proposals are small compared to the crisis the world faces. [Her office posted an updated outline of the plan today.]
"Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us," she told NPR.
Ocasio-Cortez also suggested there are ways to pay for her plans besides taxes, although she did not specify what.
“It is just certainly a lot of money,” Inskeep said. “You don’t specify where it’s going to come from other than saying it will all pay for itself.”
“Yeah, I think the first move we need to do is kind of break the mistaken idea that taxes pay for 100 percent of government expenditure,” Ocasio-Cortez answered. “It’s just not how government expenditure works. We can recoup costs, but oftentimes you look at, for example, the GOP tax cut which I think was an irresponsible use of government expenditure, but government projects are often financed by a combination of taxes, deficit spending and other kinds of investments, you know, bonds and so on.”
“Well, I get that, but deficit spending is borrowing money that has to be paid back eventually through taxes,” Inskeep reminded the freshman lawmaker.
“Yeah, and I think — I think that is always the crux of it,” she said. “So when we decide to go into the realm of deficit spending, we have to do so responsibly. We ask is this an investment or is this actually going to pay for itself?”
AOC just had the wind taken out of her sails by Pelousi
Pelosi Kicks Ocasio-Cortez To The Curb
Democrats are finally beginning to understand why everybody else finds Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to be so insufferable.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) excluded democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) from serving on the new climate change committee on Thursday, as she announced the Democratic members who will serve on the committee.
The New York Post reports that Pelosi “threw some serious shade on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — denying her a coveted spot on a special panel on climate change and brushing off her Green New Deal.”
When asked about Ocasio-Cortez’s “Green New Deal” during an interview with Politico on Wednesday, Pelosi appeared to dismiss Ocasio-Cortez’s plan.
“It will be one of several or maybe many suggestions that we receive,” Pelosi said. “The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they’re for it, right?”
Pelosi Kicks Ocasio-Cortez To The Curb | Conservative Buzz
Do females fart more than males?What kind of "stuff" is China doing???The US is #2 C02 polluter in the world. China is #1 and they are already doing stuff to curb fossil fuel use. Are we supposed to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and do nothing? No emerging technologies are perfect. We have to try. It would be awesome, wouldn't it, to be able to get half our power from renewable resources? Deniers are standing in the way of something that would be great for our grandkids and their grandkids.
Declaring that couples cannot have female babies?
This is the face of Socialism....promising the world and delivering nothing but starvation and death. Even Charles Manson had avid fans, BTW.
Ocasio-Cortez: Fixing Global Warming Requires ‘Massive Government Intervention’
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she has no qualms about acknowledging a so-called “Green New Deal” will mean unprecedented governmental intrusion into the private sector. Appearing on NPR, she was asked if she’s prepared to tell Americans outright that her plans involve “massive government intervention.”
“As you know, congresswoman, one reason that people are politically conservative are skeptical of efforts to combat climate change is that it sounds to them like it requires massive government intervention, which they just don’t like,” Steve Inskeep asked. “Are you prepared to put on that table that, ‘Yes actually they’re right, what this requires is massive government intervention’?”
“It does, it does, yeah, I have no problem saying that,” Ocasio-Cortez quickly replied. “Why? Because we have tried their approach for 40 years. For 40 years we have tried to let the private sector take care of this. They said, ‘We got this, we can do this, the forces of the market are going to force us to innovate.’”
“Except,” she continued, “for the fact that there’s a little thing in economics called externalities. And what that means is that a corporation can dump pollution in the river and they don’t have to pay, but taxpayers have to pay.”
Despite her Green New Deal including plans to remake “every” building in the United States, impose Medicare-for-All, as well as a universal basic income, Ocasio-Cortez said her proposals are small compared to the crisis the world faces. [Her office posted an updated outline of the plan today.]
"Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us," she told NPR.
Ocasio-Cortez also suggested there are ways to pay for her plans besides taxes, although she did not specify what.
“It is just certainly a lot of money,” Inskeep said. “You don’t specify where it’s going to come from other than saying it will all pay for itself.”
“Yeah, I think the first move we need to do is kind of break the mistaken idea that taxes pay for 100 percent of government expenditure,” Ocasio-Cortez answered. “It’s just not how government expenditure works. We can recoup costs, but oftentimes you look at, for example, the GOP tax cut which I think was an irresponsible use of government expenditure, but government projects are often financed by a combination of taxes, deficit spending and other kinds of investments, you know, bonds and so on.”
“Well, I get that, but deficit spending is borrowing money that has to be paid back eventually through taxes,” Inskeep reminded the freshman lawmaker.
“Yeah, and I think — I think that is always the crux of it,” she said. “So when we decide to go into the realm of deficit spending, we have to do so responsibly. We ask is this an investment or is this actually going to pay for itself?”
This is the face of Socialism....promising the world and delivering nothing but starvation and death. Even Charles Manson had avid fans, BTW.
Ocasio-Cortez: Fixing Global Warming Requires ‘Massive Government Intervention’
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she has no qualms about acknowledging a so-called “Green New Deal” will mean unprecedented governmental intrusion into the private sector. Appearing on NPR, she was asked if she’s prepared to tell Americans outright that her plans involve “massive government intervention.”
“As you know, congresswoman, one reason that people are politically conservative are skeptical of efforts to combat climate change is that it sounds to them like it requires massive government intervention, which they just don’t like,” Steve Inskeep asked. “Are you prepared to put on that table that, ‘Yes actually they’re right, what this requires is massive government intervention’?”
“It does, it does, yeah, I have no problem saying that,” Ocasio-Cortez quickly replied. “Why? Because we have tried their approach for 40 years. For 40 years we have tried to let the private sector take care of this. They said, ‘We got this, we can do this, the forces of the market are going to force us to innovate.’”
“Except,” she continued, “for the fact that there’s a little thing in economics called externalities. And what that means is that a corporation can dump pollution in the river and they don’t have to pay, but taxpayers have to pay.”
Despite her Green New Deal including plans to remake “every” building in the United States, impose Medicare-for-All, as well as a universal basic income, Ocasio-Cortez said her proposals are small compared to the crisis the world faces. [Her office posted an updated outline of the plan today.]
"Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us," she told NPR.
Ocasio-Cortez also suggested there are ways to pay for her plans besides taxes, although she did not specify what.
“It is just certainly a lot of money,” Inskeep said. “You don’t specify where it’s going to come from other than saying it will all pay for itself.”
“Yeah, I think the first move we need to do is kind of break the mistaken idea that taxes pay for 100 percent of government expenditure,” Ocasio-Cortez answered. “It’s just not how government expenditure works. We can recoup costs, but oftentimes you look at, for example, the GOP tax cut which I think was an irresponsible use of government expenditure, but government projects are often financed by a combination of taxes, deficit spending and other kinds of investments, you know, bonds and so on.”
“Well, I get that, but deficit spending is borrowing money that has to be paid back eventually through taxes,” Inskeep reminded the freshman lawmaker.
“Yeah, and I think — I think that is always the crux of it,” she said. “So when we decide to go into the realm of deficit spending, we have to do so responsibly. We ask is this an investment or is this actually going to pay for itself?”
