Anyone Worried About Manmade Climate Change and Carbon Footprints Will No Doubt Embrace This

[Weatherman2020]

Lower cost advanced Nuclear power could dominate future US energy.

For Mother Gaia!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

CO2 is the most dangerous thing in nature........we're all gonna die.
But nuclear is worse......we're all gonna die.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Embrace the atom, faggots.

 

[SSGT Bags]

CO2 is the most dangerous thing in nature........we're all gonna die.
But nuclear is worse......we're all gonna die.

No CO2, no plants - DOY!

 

[skookerasbil]

Screw that

 

[Sunsettommy]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

 

[Old Rocks]

In the '50's nuclear power was sold on the premise that it would be so cheap that we wouldn't even meter it. And it was going to be failsafe. It is and was neither. So, if you want to show me a new nuclear reactor, build it first, have it up and running, and then we can compare costs. Otherwise, we have been bit once. Solar and wind are safe, are presently the cheapest form of generation, and have no waste products comparable to nuclear.

 

[SSGT Bags]

In the '50's nuclear power was sold on the premise that it would be so cheap that we wouldn't even meter it. And it was going to be failsafe. It is and was neither. So, if you want to show me a new nuclear reactor, build it first, have it up and running, and then we can compare costs. Otherwise, we have been bit once. Solar and wind are safe, are presently the cheapest form of generation, and have no waste products comparable to nuclear.

Solar kills insects, wind kills birds.
Now, talk to me about protecting the environment.

 

[sparky]

It'll come down to $$$ per KW

~S~

 

[TheOldSchool]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

Why?

 

[sparky]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

Why?

Because the same group pointing to the wrath of climate science , also points outthe flaws of nuke energy

Check out the Union of Concerned Scientists and their take on GE's Mark reactor

~S~

 

[Sunsettommy]

In the '50's nuclear power was sold on the premise that it would be so cheap that we wouldn't even meter it. And it was going to be failsafe. It is and was neither. So, if you want to show me a new nuclear reactor, build it first, have it up and running, and then we can compare costs. Otherwise, we have been bit once. Solar and wind are safe, are presently the cheapest form of generation, and have no waste products comparable to nuclear.

It was made more expensive by ecoloonies lawsuits and bad politicians.

 

[Sunsettommy]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

Why?

It appears you and others have nothing to sell here...................................

 

[Sunsettommy]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

Why?

Because the same group pointing to the wrath of climate science , also points outthe flaws of nuke energy

Check out the Union of Concerned Scientists and their take on GE's Mark reactor

~S~

Modern Nuclear plant design is so much better than it was in the early 1980's.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

Why?

It appears you and others have nothing to sell here...................................

It appears that you are a triggered snowflake

 

[Sunsettommy]

It will be interesting to see what warmists think of this development.

Why?

It appears you and others have nothing to sell here...................................

It appears that you are a triggered snowflake

Yup you have nothing to say in this thread after all.

At least I made a few short statements about Nuclear energy.

I live right next door to a large Nuclear Reactor, that runs 11 months of the year.