Anyone surprised at this?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by CSM, Aug 30, 2006.

  1. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Defense Department
    August 30, 2006

    DoD Statement On Inaccurate Mischaracterization


    Secretary Rumsfeld spoke Tuesday to the American Legion Convention in Salt Lake City. The complete text can be found at www.defenselink.mil.

    The AP report of the speech seriously mischaracterized Secretary Rumsfeld’s remarks. Relevant portions of the Secretary’s remarks are as follows:

    “1919 was the beginning of period where, over time, a very different set of views would come to dominate public discourse and thinking in the West.

    “Over the next decades, a sentiment took root that contended that -- if only the growing threats that had begun to emerge in Europe and Asia could be accommodated, then the carnage and destruction of then-recent memory of World War I could be avoided. It was a time when a certain amount of cynicism and moral confusion set in among the western democracies. . . .

    “I recount this history because we face similar challenges in efforts to confront the threat of a new type of fascism. Today another enemy -- a different kind of enemy -- has also made clear its intentions -- with attacks in places like New York, Washington, D.C., Bali, London, Madrid, and Moscow. But some seem not to have learned history’s lessons.

    “We need to consider the following questions:

    *With the growing lethality and increasing availability of weapons, can we truly afford to believe that somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?

    *Can folks really continue to think that free countries can negotiate a separate peace with terrorists?

    *Can we truly afford the luxury of pretending that the threats today are simply “law enforcement” problems, rather than fundamentally different threats, requiring fundamentally different approaches? And

    *Can we truly afford to return to the destructive view that America – not the enemy – is the real source of the world’s troubles?

    “These are central questions of our time. And we must face them honestly. . . .

    “In every army, there are occasionally bad actors – the ones who dominate the headlines today – who don’t live up to the standards of their oath and of our country.

    “But you also know that they are a very, very small percentage of the hundreds of thousands of honorable men and women in all theaters in this struggle who are serving with humanity, and decency and courage in the face of continuous provocation.

    “And that is important in this “long war,” where any moral or intellectual confusion about who and what is right or wrong can weaken the ability of free societies to persevere. . . . ”

    The Associated Press reported as follows in part:

    “Rumsfeld Lashes Out at Bush’s Critics” by Robert Burns, AP Military Reporter.

    “Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Tuesday the world faces ‘a new type of fascism’ and likened critics of the Bush administration’s war strategy to those who tried to appease the Nazis in the 1930’s.”

    “In unusually explicit terms, Rumsfeld portrayed the administration’s critics as suffering from ‘moral and intellectual confusion’ about what threatens the nation’s security.”

    Clearly the AP report misrepresented the Secretary’s remarks. The Department has asked for a correction from the Associated Press.

    The full text of Secretary Rumsfeld’s entire speech is available on the Defense Department web site at www.defenselink.mil. More information is available at the DoD Office of Public Affairs at 703-697-5131.
     
  2. musicman
    Offline

    musicman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,171
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +533
    Sadly, no - I'm not a bit surprised. I find interesting the use of the term, "mischaracterization". What the AP has done here is an attempt to present events in a way other than that in which they actually occurred. My unabashed dictionary defines this as "lying". Lying is what the MSM/DNC do. I believe they do this instinctively - reflexively. They absolutely cannot stop themselves - even when their asses are being busted on it DAILY. Keep up the good work, guys; you consign yourselves to irrelevance more determinedly with every "scoop".
     
  3. nt250
    Offline

    nt250 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,013
    Thanks Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +72

Share This Page