Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When will the right admitt that unfettered markets have failed to produce what they claim they would produce all though history?
When will the right admitt that unfettered markets have failed to produce what they claim they would produce all though history?
That's rather like asking when compulsive liars will tell the begin telling the truth, isn't it?
Most people claiming the mantle of convervatism or Randianism, have to very selectively avoid the study of American history which unmasks the lies upon which their pernicious philosophies are based.
It was the policies of Harding and Coolidge that kept the 1920's depression from getting worse, not Hoover.
Hoover was not president but was instrumental in putting these policies in place.It was the policies of Harding and Coolidge that kept the 1920's depression from getting worse, not Hoover.
Hoover was not president but was instrumental in putting these policies in place.It was the policies of Harding and Coolidge that kept the 1920's depression from getting worse, not Hoover.
They did not cause the Depression of the 1930s, although we can always count on Leftwinger for a handy lie.
how validating that you can't comprehend simple statements in english, but aim to judge my wherewithal to debate.I am not sure you are capable of engaging in debate here.... your presumptions dont abide with basic econ or follow logic, whatsoever...... It is basic economics 101...
Paragraph 1: What does this have to do with anything? What does it even mean?
GDP is the single metric of recession, rabbi. again, your frail grasp of the very basics of economics is core to your subscribing to fools logic on the topic.Paragraph 2: What does GDP have to do with anything? On that view the more money the federal government spends the higher our GDP, the more wealth we have. We can spend ourselves into prosperity. This has worked real well for the Greeks and the state of California, right?
yes, it leaves them less money for equipment. they're ruined; after all, they struggle to afford the shit.Paragraph 3: Oracle buys equipment based on the projected economic return of that equipment. Lots of things go into that calculation, including cost of financing. If they are paying out more money for health insurance and carbon credits that leaves them less money for equipment. Pretty simple, eh?
one thing is for sure, rabbi. oracle does not factor taxes or health insurance into their procurement decisions.you are a comedian. try per-capita GDP out, or any other such measurement of economic efficiency, then let me know where china stands. there is a correlation between these economies' standards of living, labor standards, distribution of wealth, per-unit efficiency and currency value ..and their subordinate dependence on our consumption to fuel their growth.Paragraph 4: Developed and developing countries are defined in part, but only in part, by rates of growth. There are plenty of other measures. But by any measure the Chinese, Singaporeans, Indians, and other countries with lower tax rates have stronger economies than we do now.
When will the right admitt that unfettered markets have failed to produce what they claim they would produce all though history?
That's rather like asking when compulsive liars will tell the begin telling the truth, isn't it?
Most people claiming the mantle of convervatism or Randianism, have to very selectively avoid the study of American history which unmasks the lies upon which their pernicious philosophies are based.
Please point out where this occurs. The Great Depression was prolonged by Roosevelt's interventionist policies. The recession of 1920 didn't become worse largely because of the laissez faire policies of Hoover. The expected depression of 1949-1950 likewise didnt happen because Congress refused to renew New Deal policies.
These are all facts. There is nothing selective about them.
Go read the quotes of republicans when the 1993 bill was passed.
It was all doom and gloom , then reality came to pass and they lied to claim the results.
That's rather like asking when compulsive liars will tell the begin telling the truth, isn't it?
Most people claiming the mantle of convervatism or Randianism, have to very selectively avoid the study of American history which unmasks the lies upon which their pernicious philosophies are based.
Please point out where this occurs. The Great Depression was prolonged by Roosevelt's interventionist policies. The recession of 1920 didn't become worse largely because of the laissez faire policies of Hoover. The expected depression of 1949-1950 likewise didnt happen because Congress refused to renew New Deal policies.
These are all facts. There is nothing selective about them.
that is all bullshit. "the expected depression.."
if you want to drop names, rabbi, one name lands clearly in favor of editec's argument and personifies objectivist conservatism's role in bringing about and exacerbating the great depression. you've selected a lot of history around this figure, taking care to draw partisan bias along the way. tax cuts: check. no bailouts: check. no monetization: check. no flinch toward government expenditure: check. recession turned depression: check...no further ado..
andrew mellon
Please point out where this occurs. The Great Depression was prolonged by Roosevelt's interventionist policies. The recession of 1920 didn't become worse largely because of the laissez faire policies of Hoover. The expected depression of 1949-1950 likewise didnt happen because Congress refused to renew New Deal policies.
These are all facts. There is nothing selective about them.
that is all bullshit. "the expected depression.."
if you want to drop names, rabbi, one name lands clearly in favor of editec's argument and personifies objectivist conservatism's role in bringing about and exacerbating the great depression. you've selected a lot of history around this figure, taking care to draw partisan bias along the way. tax cuts: check. no bailouts: check. no monetization: check. no flinch toward government expenditure: check. recession turned depression: check...no further ado..
andrew mellon
Do you doubt that everyone expected a recession after WW2, just like we have had one after every major war?
If so you're a bigger fool than I thought.
that is all bullshit. "the expected depression.."
if you want to drop names, rabbi, one name lands clearly in favor of editec's argument and personifies objectivist conservatism's role in bringing about and exacerbating the great depression. you've selected a lot of history around this figure, taking care to draw partisan bias along the way. tax cuts: check. no bailouts: check. no monetization: check. no flinch toward government expenditure: check. recession turned depression: check...no further ado..
andrew mellon
Do you doubt that everyone expected a recession after WW2, just like we have had one after every major war?
If so you're a bigger fool than I thought.
there was a recession after WWII, dumbass. you said depression, anyhow. then you say something about 'bigger fool'; i'd let you hold on to that honor.
No one knew this more than FDR himself. His key advisers were frantic at the possibility of the Great Depression's return when the war ended and the soldiers came home. The president believed a New Deal revival was the answerand on Oct. 28, 1944, about six months before his death, he spelled out his vision for a postwar America. It included government-subsidized housing, federal involvement in health care, more TVA projects, and the "right to a useful and remunerative job" provided by the federal government if necessa
so FDR wasn't dead in 49-50? why do you bother, rabbi? you've not made a cogent argument yet.
