- Nov 29, 2008
- 25,786
- 11,295
- 940
No, see the sign, "Please do not f*** the children". It is already a very large problem.I'll have to visit some playgrounds and nursery schools and ask what their objections are...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, see the sign, "Please do not f*** the children". It is already a very large problem.I'll have to visit some playgrounds and nursery schools and ask what their objections are...
Depends on what the objections are to what policies.
Do those on the left find any merit to the Objection of those on the right to Obama's policies?
I do.
I've outlined my objections to the direction their HC solution seems to be taking, already.
They seem to be throwing money at the problem, without seriously changing any of the causes of the HC crises.
Also, I think that the escalation of troops strength in Afghanistan is likewise an unwise foreign policy.
What else?
Let's see...the credit card reforms didn't go far enough, either.
Also, as it regards the real estate crises? REwarding the banks which essantially caused the crises seems foolish.
Now as the RIGHT'S OBECTIONS to Obama's plans?
Their objections appear to me to be even dumber than Obama's policies.
And ALL of that deals with your right to personal freedom... which goes hand in hand with personal responsibility....
Everything you have in this thread that you support tries to take away that personal responsibility and place it on other citizens/taxpayers
YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO INFRINGE ON THE PERSONAL FREEDOM OF OTHERS TO HAVE THE GOVERNMENT GIVE YOU WANT YOU THINK YOU NEED OR WANT AT THE EXPENSE OF SOMEONE ELSE
You voluntarily agreed to house loan terms, you fucking live with it... you have bad enough credit that warrants a high credit card interest rate, tough shit and learn to better your credit... you want health care for your peace of mind and as a buffer to your fiscal well being, improve your job situation or earnings to fucking pay for it yourself....
Interesting it is as I feared. For the most part the thread only demonstrates that the left is deaf, dumb, and blind. We have outlined dozens of policy differences with Obama none of which have anything to do with the color of his skin. We have shown alternative solutions - solutions that unlike Obama's might actually solve the problem - and for our trouble been told that we shouldn't bother ourselves with such things but rather climb on board with solutions offered up, and not by Obama mind you but by the likes of Dingy Harry and Queen Nan, that are massively expensive, almost unimaginably complex, and will almost certainly do little to solve the problems they seek to address, but will almost certainly provide endless money for the Dem's two favorite constituencies Big Labor and trial Lawyers.
Give some concrete examples instead of generalizations and name calling, and we'll have a starting point for real debate.
Giving away borrowed cash that has to be payed back at a premium is follish.Interesting it is as I feared. For the most part the thread only demonstrates that the left is deaf, dumb, and blind. We have outlined dozens of policy differences with Obama none of which have anything to do with the color of his skin. We have shown alternative solutions - solutions that unlike Obama's might actually solve the problem - and for our trouble been told that we shouldn't bother ourselves with such things but rather climb on board with solutions offered up, and not by Obama mind you but by the likes of Dingy Harry and Queen Nan, that are massively expensive, almost unimaginably complex, and will almost certainly do little to solve the problems they seek to address, but will almost certainly provide endless money for the Dem's two favorite constituencies Big Labor and trial Lawyers.
Give some concrete examples instead of generalizations and name calling, and we'll have a starting point for real debate.
Well, how about this. The stimulus plan has stimulated nothing and it was the biggest hand out of cash to the public in history. The Cash for Clunkers actually stimulated the economy and it wa stopped ASAP.
Why did the stimulus not stimulate while the Cash for Clunkers did stimulate the economy? It's easy. A stimulus program stimulates SPENDING. SPENDING.
I don't know what the dim wits in Washington are trying to stimulate and I don't think they know either.
There. Now you have a starting point for your debate.
See.When you ask those on the right, "Which policies do you object to?", they just spout "blurbs".
Examples:
We want our country back.
We don't want his "(insert word - Marxists, Communist, Fascist) ways here in this country".
We don't want him apologizing to the world.
We don't like his diplomacy.
We don't want him spending our money on roads and bridges.
We don't want him taxing the rich.
We don't want government health care so stay away from our Medicare and Medicaid.
Republicans have made it clear, they will note vote for anything he supports. Not a one. Even when 65% of America supports something, they will not support it if it's what Obama wants.
Where are the honest Conservatives standing up against the radical fringe? There aren't any. The entire party is the radical fringe. "Let's hope for a military coup". "Terrorists need to set off a nuclear weapon inside the country". "Secession is an option".
There are more than just fringe, they are anti American 'traitors". Benedict Arnold's.
Interesting it is as I feared. For the most part the thread only demonstrates that the left is deaf, dumb, and blind. We have outlined dozens of policy differences with Obama none of which have anything to do with the color of his skin. We have shown alternative solutions - solutions that unlike Obama's might actually solve the problem - and for our trouble been told that we shouldn't bother ourselves with such things but rather climb on board with solutions offered up, and not by Obama mind you but by the likes of Dingy Harry and Queen Nan, that are massively expensive, almost unimaginably complex, and will almost certainly do little to solve the problems they seek to address, but will almost certainly provide endless money for the Dem's two favorite constituencies Big Labor and trial Lawyers.
I do.
I've outlined my objections to the direction their HC solution seems to be taking, already.
They seem to be throwing money at the problem, without seriously changing any of the causes of the HC crises.
Also, I think that the escalation of troops strength in Afghanistan is likewise an unwise foreign policy.
What else?
Let's see...the credit card reforms didn't go far enough, either.
Also, as it regards the real estate crises? REwarding the banks which essantially caused the crises seems foolish.
Now as the RIGHT'S OBECTIONS to Obama's plans?
Their objections appear to me to be even dumber than Obama's policies.
And ALL of that deals with your right to personal freedom... which goes hand in hand with personal responsibility....
Everything you have in this thread that you support tries to take away that personal responsibility and place it on other citizens/taxpayers
YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO INFRINGE ON THE PERSONAL FREEDOM OF OTHERS TO HAVE THE GOVERNMENT GIVE YOU WANT YOU THINK YOU NEED OR WANT AT THE EXPENSE OF SOMEONE ELSE
You voluntarily agreed to house loan terms, you fucking live with it... you have bad enough credit that warrants a high credit card interest rate, tough shit and learn to better your credit... you want health care for your peace of mind and as a buffer to your fiscal well being, improve your job situation or earnings to fucking pay for it yourself....
All very interesting but what does that screed have to do with anything I've posted?
Not a fucking thing.
Here's a thought...why not learn something about policies in question and then lecture us about why those policies don't jibe with your political theories?
It's doable, ya know.
Interesting it is as I feared. For the most part the thread only demonstrates that the left is deaf, dumb, and blind. We have outlined dozens of policy differences with Obama none of which have anything to do with the color of his skin. We have shown alternative solutions - solutions that unlike Obama's might actually solve the problem - and for our trouble been told that we shouldn't bother ourselves with such things but rather climb on board with solutions offered up, and not by Obama mind you but by the likes of Dingy Harry and Queen Nan, that are massively expensive, almost unimaginably complex, and will almost certainly do little to solve the problems they seek to address, but will almost certainly provide endless money for the Dem's two favorite constituencies Big Labor and trial Lawyers.
Republican solutions:
- Cut more taxes on the wealthy
- Trickle Down
- Blame the poor for their situation
- Negotiate your position...then vote NO
- Stall for more time
- Fear Monger
Yes we have seen their solutions and they destroyed this country
As for why the extreme left's policies do not "jibe" with mine... .simple.. they are against the standards set forth in the framing of this country.. they are infringing on the personal freedoms of the contributors for the benefit of the non-contributors in a wealth redistribution scheme for votes... for it is real easy to keep a voting base when you offer them shit at the expense of others... I.E. your and the left's stances on health care, credit card reform, mortgage bailouts, etc...
As for why the extreme left's policies do not "jibe" with mine... .simple.. they are against the standards set forth in the framing of this country.. they are infringing on the personal freedoms of the contributors for the benefit of the non-contributors in a wealth redistribution scheme for votes... for it is real easy to keep a voting base when you offer them shit at the expense of others... I.E. your and the left's stances on health care, credit card reform, mortgage bailouts, etc...
Complete and total right wing Bull Shit
Show where anything the Democrats have done violates the Constitution. The American public overwhelmingly voted out the republicans for their inept handling of the country. "We the People" have spoken and we do not want the failed policies of the republicans
Handouts to others at the expense of contributors.. inherently against the premise of the constitution...
Handouts to others at the expense of contributors.. inherently against the premise of the constitution...
Show me!
Wishing it to be so does not make it so...
Handouts to others at the expense of contributors.. inherently against the premise of the constitution...
Show me!
Wishing it to be so does not make it so...
Section. 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Note the fucking language you leftist entitlement junkie
The second part, is a limitation on what taxes are to pay for... not the term general welfare, not individual welfare.... it is for the country as a whole, not for anyone's sole individual benefit... you do NOT have the right spelled out ANYWHERE in the constitution that you are motherfucking entitled to one motherfucking cent of anyone else's earnings for your motherfucking personal responsibilities