Antifa Explained

[antifa]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Dear antifa
Don't forget free speech for the Klan and the White Nationalist.

Ray Hill is one liberal activist who has defended free speech consistently,
even has his name on the historic lawsuit against the City of Houston
that successfully defended the right of the KKK to march publicly in the streets of Houston.

He teaches the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinksy, and recently held a 3 hour workshop
at a local university on how to be more effective in activism.

He is one of the few who lives up to the philosophy you cite above.
Defending free speech for everyone means defending it for us.
And this includes the Klan and people we disagree with.

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

I dunno, liberals must be getting the discount rate.

Eugene Debs was sentenced to 10 years in prison for anti-war speech.
Phil Donahue was fired from msnbc for anti-war speech.
Anyone opposing for-profit wars are beaten and taken to jail.

Let's not forget who the fascist are.

 

[BrokeLoser]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Dear antifa
Don't forget free speech for the Klan and the White Nationalist.

Ray Hill is one liberal activist who has defended free speech consistently,
even has his name on the historic lawsuit against the City of Houston
that successfully defended the right of the KKK to march publicly in the streets of Houston.

He teaches the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinksy, and recently held a 3 hour workshop
at a local university on how to be more effective in activism.

He is one of the few who lives up to the philosophy you cite above.
Defending free speech for everyone means defending it for us.
And this includes the Klan and people we disagree with.

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

 

[Godboy]

Facism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

Learn the definition and then quit being a fucking weirdo.

It's obvious that you didn't watch the video.

It's obvious that you don't even know the definition of thing thing you claim you are fighting.

If you watch the video you will see it does a pretty good job of explain what Antifa is fighting.

Do you believe there is such a thing as institutional racism in the U.S.?
Do you believe there is a way to avoid a civil war with the alt-right?

Institutional racism.....no.....
the alt right is another made up term you guys use as a boogey man......it's just the replacement for neocons........another group that you guys predicted doom from.

Dear buckeye45_73
one example of "institutionalized racism":
the difference in response when a "white woman" is missing and reported in the news
vs. when a "black woman" is reported as missing. There's even a website for
"Black and Missing" to address the disparity in public response and support.

More people relate to white people as an "individual"
but see "black people" as a collective group not as individuals.
(Someone else brought up issues with "individualism" as the key to
understanding white biases that favor whites, while classing minorities as a group and devaluing them.)

I believe this comes from a cultural difference. In a mediation training workshop I took through
a nonprofit group, the issue came up about cultural difference in communication patterns:
People from European backgrounds and culture tended to follow a LINEAR way of communicating
and making agreements by holding people INDIVIDUALLY responsible; while people from
Asian, Latino and African American backgrounds tended to process decisions relatively,
in relation to others or collectively as a family or community, holding interests of others equally or above oneself.
So this affects how we process information, either focusing "individually" or "collectively/holistically."

To deal with response to crime, that's why the "community-based" model of crime prevention
has helped improve relations with communities and to reduce crime.

Missing persons who make the news are rare. About 100,000 go missing each year and maybe 5 or 6 of them make national headlines. All races get a bad deal when they go missing.

 

[Godboy]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Dear antifa
Don't forget free speech for the Klan and the White Nationalist.

Ray Hill is one liberal activist who has defended free speech consistently,
even has his name on the historic lawsuit against the City of Houston
that successfully defended the right of the KKK to march publicly in the streets of Houston.

He teaches the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinksy, and recently held a 3 hour workshop
at a local university on how to be more effective in activism.

He is one of the few who lives up to the philosophy you cite above.
Defending free speech for everyone means defending it for us.
And this includes the Klan and people we disagree with.

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

 

[antifa]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Dear antifa
Don't forget free speech for the Klan and the White Nationalist.

Ray Hill is one liberal activist who has defended free speech consistently,
even has his name on the historic lawsuit against the City of Houston
that successfully defended the right of the KKK to march publicly in the streets of Houston.

He teaches the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinksy, and recently held a 3 hour workshop
at a local university on how to be more effective in activism.

He is one of the few who lives up to the philosophy you cite above.
Defending free speech for everyone means defending it for us.
And this includes the Klan and people we disagree with.

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Dear antifa
Don't forget free speech for the Klan and the White Nationalist.

Ray Hill is one liberal activist who has defended free speech consistently,
even has his name on the historic lawsuit against the City of Houston
that successfully defended the right of the KKK to march publicly in the streets of Houston.

He teaches the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinksy, and recently held a 3 hour workshop
at a local university on how to be more effective in activism.

He is one of the few who lives up to the philosophy you cite above.
Defending free speech for everyone means defending it for us.
And this includes the Klan and people we disagree with.

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

“Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.“
Haha...that’s some funny shit...what are those scrawny little professional gamers living in mommy’s garage really gonna do?
All I’ve seen is filthy little Antifa fucks getting their asses beat. Remember that stupid little carpet munching hippie whore that got punched in the face? hahaha

 

[emilynghiem]

Dear antifa
Don't forget free speech for the Klan and the White Nationalist.

Ray Hill is one liberal activist who has defended free speech consistently,
even has his name on the historic lawsuit against the City of Houston
that successfully defended the right of the KKK to march publicly in the streets of Houston.

He teaches the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinksy, and recently held a 3 hour workshop
at a local university on how to be more effective in activism.

He is one of the few who lives up to the philosophy you cite above.
Defending free speech for everyone means defending it for us.
And this includes the Klan and people we disagree with.

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

No antifa
The court system replaced the duel.
And because the court system is monopolized by lawyers and judges paying each other off politically,
that's where we lost free speech and the right to petition.

The best way I've seen to restore free speech, due process and right to petition to redress grievances is
* mediation to reach consensus so all parties interests are included and protected equally
* conflict resolution to either agree on policies and solutions, or agree to separate jurisdiction and have separately paid programs
* proportional representation by party, where whole groups can govern themselves under the policies of their choice, according to their beliefs,
and allow other groups to do the same, so they don't impose their conflicting beliefs on each other or through govt on anyone else who disagrees

NONE of these methods involve physical punching or violence.
The worst that would happen is verbal bullying and venting back and forth
which is part of FREE SPEECH.

You don't need to get physically violent to exercise free speech.
Usually it's when free speech fails that it turns physical.

With inclusive forums for mediation and conflict resolution, where nobody is judged or excluded
for expressing their beliefs verbally, this allows conflicts to be resolved peacefully without resorting to physical bullying to coerce anyone.

 

[antifa]

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

No antifa
The court system replaced the duel.
And because the court system is monopolized by lawyers and judges paying each other off politically,
that's where we lost free speech and the right to petition.

The best way I've seen to restore free speech, due process and right to petition to redress grievances is
* mediation to reach consensus so all parties interests are included and protected equally
* conflict resolution to either agree on policies and solutions, or agree to separate jurisdiction and have separately paid programs
* proportional representation by party, where whole groups can govern themselves under the policies of their choice, according to their beliefs,
and allow other groups to do the same, so they don't impose their conflicting beliefs on each other or through govt on anyone else who disagrees

NONE of these methods involve physical punching or violence.
The worst that would happen is verbal bullying and venting back and forth
which is part of FREE SPEECH.

You don't need to get physically violent to exercise free speech.
Usually it's when free speech fails that it turns physical.

With inclusive forums for mediation and conflict resolution, where nobody is judged or excluded
for expressing their beliefs verbally, this allows conflicts to be resolved peacefully without resorting to physical bullying to coerce anyone.

Emily, I don't need the courts to protect me. That's the difference between a real conservative and a fake conservative who is dependent on the taxpayer to solve all their problems. Street justice is poetic and much more affective than government.

 

[antifa]

I am a proponent of free speech. It is the fascists who burn books.

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

“Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.“
Haha...that’s some funny shit...what are those scrawny little professional gamers living in mommy’s garage really gonna do?
All I’ve seen is filthy little Antifa fucks getting their asses beat. Remember that stupid little carpet munching hippie whore that got punched in the face? hahaha

Wow, a fascist is proud to post a pic of another fascist punching a woman. That's more proof you are deplorable.

 

[emilynghiem]

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

No antifa
The court system replaced the duel.
And because the court system is monopolized by lawyers and judges paying each other off politically,
that's where we lost free speech and the right to petition.

The best way I've seen to restore free speech, due process and right to petition to redress grievances is
* mediation to reach consensus so all parties interests are included and protected equally
* conflict resolution to either agree on policies and solutions, or agree to separate jurisdiction and have separately paid programs
* proportional representation by party, where whole groups can govern themselves under the policies of their choice, according to their beliefs,
and allow other groups to do the same, so they don't impose their conflicting beliefs on each other or through govt on anyone else who disagrees

NONE of these methods involve physical punching or violence.
The worst that would happen is verbal bullying and venting back and forth
which is part of FREE SPEECH.

You don't need to get physically violent to exercise free speech.
Usually it's when free speech fails that it turns physical.

With inclusive forums for mediation and conflict resolution, where nobody is judged or excluded
for expressing their beliefs verbally, this allows conflicts to be resolved peacefully without resorting to physical bullying to coerce anyone.

Emily, I don't need the courts to protect me. That's the difference between a real conservative and a fake conservative who is dependent on the taxpayer to solve all their problems. Street justice is poetic and much more affective than government.

Dear antifa that's not what I am saying.
I agree with you that we the people invoke the laws directly ourselves.

What does apply to people like you and me who recognize we invoke authority of law ourselves,
is that we lose our free speech when we censor the free speech of others.
We lose our free exercise of religion when we oppress the same of others.
We lose our right to petition to redress grievances when we deny this right to others.

Likewise, we DEFEND free speech when we defend this right for everyone equally.
We DEFEND and enforce the right to redress grievances when we practice it.
We DEFEND due process and the right of defense when we respect this for ourselves equally as others.

That's why I was warning in a previous message
NOT to violate the due process of others, because that hurts everyone.

If our goal is to defend equal justice for all people, then we should respect
due process and not punish or judge anyone without following that process.

What I have seen from experience, antifa, is when people are confronted
with the wrongs, they naturally seek to correct themselves. Thus the need for punishment
becomes void. They take responsibility to fix their own problems because people have pride and free will.
They want to be in charge. So when you give and respect them for taking that responsibility, they do so.

This is why I promote redressing grievances directly between people, antifa.
And yes I agree with you, totally, that if we all did this, we'd end the need for courts.
The courts at most would "rubber stamp" agreements that the people make amongst ourselves.

We resolve our own conflicts, then we don't need courts or govt stepping in to settle our conflicts for us.

I totally believe we need to take back this power that we have as inherent in our human nature.
We become dependent on govt when we can't resolve our own conflicts.
But who says we can't?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Then you aren't ANTIFA, who actively and violently opposes free speech.

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

“Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.“
Haha...that’s some funny shit...what are those scrawny little professional gamers living in mommy’s garage really gonna do?
All I’ve seen is filthy little Antifa fucks getting their asses beat. Remember that stupid little carpet munching hippie whore that got punched in the face? hahaha

Wow, a fascist is proud to post a pic of another fascist punching a woman. That's more proof you are deplorable.

She looked like a violent little tranny...no way to know if she was a man or woman. I would have smashed “its” punk ass too.
Are you sure you know and understand the definition of "deplorable"?
You know those filthy un-American pieces of shits, those gamers that live in moms converted garage...you know, those Antifa clowns?
So tell me please....who's deplorable?

de·plor·a·ble
dəˈplôrəb(ə)l/
adjective

1. deserving strong condemnation.
   "the deplorable conditions in which most prisoners are held"
   synonyms: disgraceful, shameful, dishonorable, unworthy, inexcusable, unpardonable, unforgivable; More
   • shockingly bad in quality.
     "her spelling was deplorable"
     synonyms: lamentable, regrettable, unfortunate, wretched, atrocious, awful, terrible, dreadful, diabolical; More

 

[antifa]

There is a price to pay for hate speech.

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

No antifa
The court system replaced the duel.
And because the court system is monopolized by lawyers and judges paying each other off politically,
that's where we lost free speech and the right to petition.

The best way I've seen to restore free speech, due process and right to petition to redress grievances is
* mediation to reach consensus so all parties interests are included and protected equally
* conflict resolution to either agree on policies and solutions, or agree to separate jurisdiction and have separately paid programs
* proportional representation by party, where whole groups can govern themselves under the policies of their choice, according to their beliefs,
and allow other groups to do the same, so they don't impose their conflicting beliefs on each other or through govt on anyone else who disagrees

NONE of these methods involve physical punching or violence.
The worst that would happen is verbal bullying and venting back and forth
which is part of FREE SPEECH.

You don't need to get physically violent to exercise free speech.
Usually it's when free speech fails that it turns physical.

With inclusive forums for mediation and conflict resolution, where nobody is judged or excluded
for expressing their beliefs verbally, this allows conflicts to be resolved peacefully without resorting to physical bullying to coerce anyone.

Emily, I don't need the courts to protect me. That's the difference between a real conservative and a fake conservative who is dependent on the taxpayer to solve all their problems. Street justice is poetic and much more affective than government.

Dear antifa that's not what I am saying.
I agree with you that we the people invoke the laws directly ourselves.

What does apply to people like you and me who recognize we invoke authority of law ourselves,
is that we lose our free speech when we censor the free speech of others.
We lose our free exercise of religion when we oppress the same of others.
We lose our right to petition to redress grievances when we deny this right to others.

Likewise, we DEFEND free speech when we defend this right for everyone equally.
We DEFEND and enforce the right to redress grievances when we practice it.
We DEFEND due process and the right of defense when we respect this for ourselves equally as others.

That's why I was warning in a previous message
NOT to violate the due process of others, because that hurts everyone.

If our goal is to defend equal justice for all people, then we should respect
due process and not punish or judge anyone without following that process.

What I have seen from experience, antifa, is when people are confronted
with the wrongs, they naturally seek to correct themselves. Thus the need for punishment
becomes void. They take responsibility to fix their own problems because people have pride and free will.
They want to be in charge. So when you give and respect them for taking that responsibility, they do so.

This is why I promote redressing grievances directly between people, antifa.
And yes I agree with you, totally, that if we all did this, we'd end the need for courts.
The courts at most would "rubber stamp" agreements that the people make amongst ourselves.

We resolve our own conflicts, then we don't need courts or govt stepping in to settle our conflicts for us.

I totally believe we need to take back this power that we have as inherent in our human nature.
We become dependent on govt when we can't resolve our own conflicts.
But who says we can't?

Emily, don't take this personal but you are looking for utopia. I live in the real world where there are consequences for hate speech. Anyone who thinks they have the right to spew hate in public has to accept the consequence.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Facism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

Learn the definition and then quit being a fucking weirdo.

It's obvious that you didn't watch the video.

It's obvious that you don't even know the definition of thing thing you claim you are fighting.

If you watch the video you will see it does a pretty good job of explain what Antifa is fighting.

Do you believe there is such a thing as institutional racism in the U.S.?
Do you believe there is a way to avoid a civil war with the alt-right?

Institutional racism.....no.....
the alt right is another made up term you guys use as a boogey man......it's just the replacement for neocons........another group that you guys predicted doom from.

Dear buckeye45_73
one example of "institutionalized racism":
the difference in response when a "white woman" is missing and reported in the news
vs. when a "black woman" is reported as missing. There's even a website for
"Black and Missing" to address the disparity in public response and support.

More people relate to white people as an "individual"
but see "black people" as a collective group not as individuals.
(Someone else brought up issues with "individualism" as the key to
understanding white biases that favor whites, while classing minorities as a group and devaluing them.)

I believe this comes from a cultural difference. In a mediation training workshop I took through
a nonprofit group, the issue came up about cultural difference in communication patterns:
People from European backgrounds and culture tended to follow a LINEAR way of communicating
and making agreements by holding people INDIVIDUALLY responsible; while people from
Asian, Latino and African American backgrounds tended to process decisions relatively,
in relation to others or collectively as a family or community, holding interests of others equally or above oneself.
So this affects how we process information, either focusing "individually" or "collectively/holistically."

To deal with response to crime, that's why the "community-based" model of crime prevention
has helped improve relations with communities and to reduce crime.

Well I think there is a difference, white people tend to be more individualistic....but blacks have been taught to be part a group and it hurts them. Identity politics is really really good for democrats....really really bad for the groups they represent. It goes into the process of "acting white" which is one of the worst things a black can do....unfortunately it's also the way for them to improve....things like good English, education, getting a job.....those are considered acting white by a large percentage of the black population.


and I do think that ties into news broadcasts....first it's not like the news business is ultra conservative, it's usually the other way.....and the reason why people don't care.....is because the people in that community don't care....some do, but the vast majority do not......again I think it comes to the value of the group as well as the culture that is in the inner cities where people focus more on them and less on the community

 

[MindWars]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

You are a brainwashed you have been taught to believe what you do; by a bunch of communist asses. Learn history maybe those dots can come together for you.

These teachers of communism are smarter than you will ever be and any other ANTIFA idiot.
's called you are victims of PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE and it was done brainwashing you fools.

Know who is sitting next to Obama probably not.

 

[MindWars]

I have a theory for "contact" with Antifa.

It involves doses of .308 to their heads. Sorry dude that's here, it is what it is. You hitched your horse to the wrong wagon.

More proof of why we are needed.

"Antifa Saved Their Lives": Report from Clergy at Charlottesville - It's Going Down

 

[Godboy]

There isn't a price to pay when speech is free, but as I said, ANTIFA doesn't believe in free speech. Thank you for proving my point.

When government got rid of the duel, they also got rid of free speech. Antifa is bringing the duel back so if you want to talk shit in public, you risk getting a bloody face.

No antifa
The court system replaced the duel.
And because the court system is monopolized by lawyers and judges paying each other off politically,
that's where we lost free speech and the right to petition.

The best way I've seen to restore free speech, due process and right to petition to redress grievances is
* mediation to reach consensus so all parties interests are included and protected equally
* conflict resolution to either agree on policies and solutions, or agree to separate jurisdiction and have separately paid programs
* proportional representation by party, where whole groups can govern themselves under the policies of their choice, according to their beliefs,
and allow other groups to do the same, so they don't impose their conflicting beliefs on each other or through govt on anyone else who disagrees

NONE of these methods involve physical punching or violence.
The worst that would happen is verbal bullying and venting back and forth
which is part of FREE SPEECH.

You don't need to get physically violent to exercise free speech.
Usually it's when free speech fails that it turns physical.

With inclusive forums for mediation and conflict resolution, where nobody is judged or excluded
for expressing their beliefs verbally, this allows conflicts to be resolved peacefully without resorting to physical bullying to coerce anyone.

Emily, I don't need the courts to protect me. That's the difference between a real conservative and a fake conservative who is dependent on the taxpayer to solve all their problems. Street justice is poetic and much more affective than government.

Dear antifa that's not what I am saying.
I agree with you that we the people invoke the laws directly ourselves.

What does apply to people like you and me who recognize we invoke authority of law ourselves,
is that we lose our free speech when we censor the free speech of others.
We lose our free exercise of religion when we oppress the same of others.
We lose our right to petition to redress grievances when we deny this right to others.

Likewise, we DEFEND free speech when we defend this right for everyone equally.
We DEFEND and enforce the right to redress grievances when we practice it.
We DEFEND due process and the right of defense when we respect this for ourselves equally as others.

That's why I was warning in a previous message
NOT to violate the due process of others, because that hurts everyone.

If our goal is to defend equal justice for all people, then we should respect
due process and not punish or judge anyone without following that process.

What I have seen from experience, antifa, is when people are confronted
with the wrongs, they naturally seek to correct themselves. Thus the need for punishment
becomes void. They take responsibility to fix their own problems because people have pride and free will.
They want to be in charge. So when you give and respect them for taking that responsibility, they do so.

This is why I promote redressing grievances directly between people, antifa.
And yes I agree with you, totally, that if we all did this, we'd end the need for courts.
The courts at most would "rubber stamp" agreements that the people make amongst ourselves.

We resolve our own conflicts, then we don't need courts or govt stepping in to settle our conflicts for us.

I totally believe we need to take back this power that we have as inherent in our human nature.
We become dependent on govt when we can't resolve our own conflicts.
But who says we can't?

Emily, don't take this personal but you are looking for utopia. I live in the real world where there are consequences for hate speech. Anyone who thinks they have the right to spew hate in public has to accept the consequence.

YOU and ANTIFA are spewing hate, literally. Going by your method, people should be shooting you guys on sight.

 

[antifa]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

You are a brainwashed you have been taught to believe what you do; by a bunch of communist asses. Learn history maybe those dots can come together for you.

These teachers of communism are smarter than you will ever be and any other ANTIFA idiot.
's called you are victims of PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE and it was done brainwashing you fools.

Know who is sitting next to Obama probably not.

The irony of a fascist telling anyone to learn history. There are plenty of alternative facts in history. It takes a lot of time and cognition to separate the wheat from the chaff.

 

[Godboy]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

You are a brainwashed you have been taught to believe what you do; by a bunch of communist asses. Learn history maybe those dots can come together for you.

These teachers of communism are smarter than you will ever be and any other ANTIFA idiot.
's called you are victims of PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE and it was done brainwashing you fools.

Know who is sitting next to Obama probably not.

The irony of a fascist telling anyone to learn history. There are plenty of alternative facts in history. It takes a lot of time and cognition to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Fascism doesn't exist in the US. Are you STILL ignorant of its definition?

 

[Doc1]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

You are a brainwashed you have been taught to believe what you do; by a bunch of communist asses. Learn history maybe those dots can come together for you.

These teachers of communism are smarter than you will ever be and any other ANTIFA idiot.
's called you are victims of PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE and it was done brainwashing you fools.

Know who is sitting next to Obama probably not.

The irony of a fascist telling anyone to learn history. There are plenty of alternative facts in history. It takes a lot of time and cognition to separate the wheat from the chaff.

You don't anything about history, nor true Fascism. All you're trying to do is justify your own fascism.

 

[antifa]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

You are a brainwashed you have been taught to believe what you do; by a bunch of communist asses. Learn history maybe those dots can come together for you.

These teachers of communism are smarter than you will ever be and any other ANTIFA idiot.
's called you are victims of PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE and it was done brainwashing you fools.

Know who is sitting next to Obama probably not.

The irony of a fascist telling anyone to learn history. There are plenty of alternative facts in history. It takes a lot of time and cognition to separate the wheat from the chaff.

You don't anything about history, nor true Fascism. All you're trying to do is justify your own fascism.

Sheldon Wolin wrote about inverted fascism. Give the class a summary of what inverted fascism is.