Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because anti-white racism is mainstream and institutionalized, dipshit.How could anyone be racist against white people?
You ever met a democrat?
The only thing they hate more than individual liberty, is white people.
You know you're not the representative of all white people, right, UnC?
This a very strange forum at various times.
Quite a few white people(not all) post regularly that they are "superior" to non whites, and that if not "for them" the world would generally be a 3rd world cesspool....there are some here who make that claim and they can contruct an intelligent sentence, let alone save the rest of us poor wretched souls who were cursed at birth by not being born white.
Then the same ones will often state that "democrats hate them, blacks hate them, liberals hate them"...etc, etc, then they say that "blacks play the part of victims, more often than any other demographic".
What a burden it must be to carry such a plethora of conflicting emotions.
Blacks do play victim, just debate one and count how long before the because of slavery thing comes out, no body as even seen a slave for centuries.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is far more victimhood here about "anti white" sentiment in this forum than there is about slavery.
Absolutely asinine ideas are being thrown around by enormous numbers of American blacks. All it takes is for a black guy to get shot by a white person, or cop of any race, and the looneytunes are up in arms, and ready to riot.
The we have the almost as asinine public officials (gutless cowards) who are perfectly OK with charging an obviously innocent person (non-black) with murder or manslaughter, to avoid rioting .
You see where this is going ? Actually, it has already gone there >>
1. George Zimmerman & Trayvon Martin
2. Darren Wilson & Michael Brown
3. Daniel Pantaleo & Eric Garner
4. 6 Baltimore cops & Freddie Gray
5. Timothy Loehmann & Tamar Rice
6. Betty Shelby & Terrence Crutcher
7. Michael Slager & Betty Shelby
Despite clear evidence of justifiable homicide, large numbers of blacks, egged on by unscrupulous black “leaders”, like Ray Owens, pastor of Metropolitan Baptist Church -- Tulsa’s largest predominantly black congregation -in the Betty Shelby case, innocent cops and citizens with CCW permits are being railroaded because of pandering to anti-white, anti-police hysteria. There cannot and will not be an end to all this racial, paranaoic lunacy, as long as irresponsible public official keep throwing their police and gun owners under the bus, to appease the masses of the racially deranged.
Prosecutors have got to stand up to the Obamas, the Sharptons, Ray Owenss, and other race hustler provocateurs, and assess shooting cases correctly. They need to judge them as self-defense, when that is what they are (ex. Zimmerman, Wilson, Shelby), and assess other cases properly, according to the circumstances, not to loudmouth instigators and mindless mobs.
If the rioters do come out in full force, then they should be met with greater force by the police and National Guard, who should be heavily armed, ready to deal, and take whatever action is necessary, to stop that rioting. Instances like we’ve seen in Ferguson, MO, Baltimore, MD, and other places are a national disgrace, they are idiocy, and should never be allowed to happen again.
Now that Obama is finally (and thankfully) gone, no longer do government officials like Jay Nixon and Stephanie Rawlings have to worry about DOJ civil rights lawsuits, and the insurmountable costs of fighting them. No excuses any more.
You are just mad because he annihilated what little argument that YOU had.For every 1 white female gaining from affirmative action, there's likely 1000 who are harmed by it by virtue of the white male husbands, fathers and sons being discriminated against by it. And this is an enormous number >> the largest number of people (Whites), who have been victim of the most amount of discrimination (AA), of any group, in any 56 year period (1961-2017), in American history.No. YOU arent. It is not rocket science to figure out that as the most prosperous beneficiaries of AA that white females have propelled many white families into dual income success.
You are too young and far too stupid and lazy to recall or research the era when even they were not typically placed in executive or managerial positions.
You prefer to portray the "poor, maligned white male' as a sacrificial lamb.
False argument. No facts to support your nonsense.
You are projecting your own failure onto the majority of white males.
Your sob story is because of your own inadequacy
He didn't even have to mention the number of white girls who grow up disadvantaged because their father couldn't get into the school he qualified for, and had to settle on a lower paying job.
Affirmative Action even fucks over white women when it supposedly helps them the most, much less what it does to white men.
Because anti-white racism is mainstream and institutionalized, dipshit.You ever met a democrat?
The only thing they hate more than individual liberty, is white people.
You know you're not the representative of all white people, right, UnC?
This a very strange forum at various times.
Quite a few white people(not all) post regularly that they are "superior" to non whites, and that if not "for them" the world would generally be a 3rd world cesspool....there are some here who make that claim and they can contruct an intelligent sentence, let alone save the rest of us poor wretched souls who were cursed at birth by not being born white.
Then the same ones will often state that "democrats hate them, blacks hate them, liberals hate them"...etc, etc, then they say that "blacks play the part of victims, more often than any other demographic".
What a burden it must be to carry such a plethora of conflicting emotions.
Blacks do play victim, just debate one and count how long before the because of slavery thing comes out, no body as even seen a slave for centuries.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is far more victimhood here about "anti white" sentiment in this forum than there is about slavery.
There is no bureaucracy fighting against anti-white racism, so that means it is only getting worse year to year.
Black people can't even fathom the shit that a white person has to go through if they live in a "diverse" area.
I don't expect a racist asshole like you to care, I was merely explaining why you have everything so ass backwards.Because anti-white racism is mainstream and institutionalized, dipshit.You know you're not the representative of all white people, right, UnC?
This a very strange forum at various times.
Quite a few white people(not all) post regularly that they are "superior" to non whites, and that if not "for them" the world would generally be a 3rd world cesspool....there are some here who make that claim and they can contruct an intelligent sentence, let alone save the rest of us poor wretched souls who were cursed at birth by not being born white.
Then the same ones will often state that "democrats hate them, blacks hate them, liberals hate them"...etc, etc, then they say that "blacks play the part of victims, more often than any other demographic".
What a burden it must be to carry such a plethora of conflicting emotions.
Blacks do play victim, just debate one and count how long before the because of slavery thing comes out, no body as even seen a slave for centuries.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is far more victimhood here about "anti white" sentiment in this forum than there is about slavery.
There is no bureaucracy fighting against anti-white racism, so that means it is only getting worse year to year.
Black people can't even fathom the shit that a white person has to go through if they live in a "diverse" area.
Poor little maligned white kid. My heart bleeds for you.
I don't expect a racist asshole like you to care, I was merely explaining why you have everything so ass backwards.Because anti-white racism is mainstream and institutionalized, dipshit.This a very strange forum at various times.
Quite a few white people(not all) post regularly that they are "superior" to non whites, and that if not "for them" the world would generally be a 3rd world cesspool....there are some here who make that claim and they can contruct an intelligent sentence, let alone save the rest of us poor wretched souls who were cursed at birth by not being born white.
Then the same ones will often state that "democrats hate them, blacks hate them, liberals hate them"...etc, etc, then they say that "blacks play the part of victims, more often than any other demographic".
What a burden it must be to carry such a plethora of conflicting emotions.
Blacks do play victim, just debate one and count how long before the because of slavery thing comes out, no body as even seen a slave for centuries.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is far more victimhood here about "anti white" sentiment in this forum than there is about slavery.
There is no bureaucracy fighting against anti-white racism, so that means it is only getting worse year to year.
Black people can't even fathom the shit that a white person has to go through if they live in a "diverse" area.
Poor little maligned white kid. My heart bleeds for you.
So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"I'm not angry and I certainly dont need to argue, little guy.
His self pitying tantrums like yours are worth little more than a laugh.
There is ample information out there that supports the fact that white females have prospered more than any other demographic from AA.
If you are currently being raised in a dual income household and there is a white female manager or executive in that household, it is doubtful that she would have held that position prior to the era of AA.
You and your cartoon pal should try using Google, it is your friend.
So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"I'm not angry and I certainly dont need to argue, little guy.
His self pitying tantrums like yours are worth little more than a laugh.
There is ample information out there that supports the fact that white females have prospered more than any other demographic from AA.
If you are currently being raised in a dual income household and there is a white female manager or executive in that household, it is doubtful that she would have held that position prior to the era of AA.
You and your cartoon pal should try using Google, it is your friend.
The main point is about who has suffered because of AA, and that is whites. >> ALL whites including women (wives, daughters, mothers of white male AA victims).
The reason there isn't anarchy is because white people have been deracialized.So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"I'm not angry and I certainly dont need to argue, little guy.
His self pitying tantrums like yours are worth little more than a laugh.
There is ample information out there that supports the fact that white females have prospered more than any other demographic from AA.
If you are currently being raised in a dual income household and there is a white female manager or executive in that household, it is doubtful that she would have held that position prior to the era of AA.
You and your cartoon pal should try using Google, it is your friend.
The main point is about who has suffered because of AA, and that is whites. >> ALL whites including women (wives, daughters, mothers of white male AA victims).
Your ignorance astounding. White females have displaced white males in managerial and executive positions at a far greater rate than any other demographic, and you are arrogant and dumb enough to attribute this totally to wholesale failure on the part of "EVERY OTHER" demographic? Because "you say so" makes it fact?
That is a ludicrous assumption that is not supported by a single fact or study that you can produce.
If there were "hundreds of thousands" if not "millions" of white people impacted by the placement of non whites in the work place there would be anarchy in the streets. Why is that not the case now?
Even a simpleton like you should realize that the resson is white families have prospered substantially due the wave of success of generated for white females through AA.
How many white female executives have ascended the ranks more quickly between the decades of the 70's though the 90's versus the 60's?
Try looking up and posting something of sustance instead of pulling made up numbers out of your ass.
White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -
Thanks for proving the OP's point....
The point is you "tough guys" are wimpy assholes and cry babies ...all the Alpha Male shit you all talk about is Bull shit ...you all are Punks who can dish out but whine when its served to you ...fuck off weakling wimp- we are not going to ever be Politically correct with Trump supporting shit heads LOL go ahead and cry LolThanks for proving the OP's point....
The reason there isn't anarchy is because white people have been deracialized.So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"I'm not angry and I certainly dont need to argue, little guy.
His self pitying tantrums like yours are worth little more than a laugh.
There is ample information out there that supports the fact that white females have prospered more than any other demographic from AA.
If you are currently being raised in a dual income household and there is a white female manager or executive in that household, it is doubtful that she would have held that position prior to the era of AA.
You and your cartoon pal should try using Google, it is your friend.
The main point is about who has suffered because of AA, and that is whites. >> ALL whites including women (wives, daughters, mothers of white male AA victims).
Your ignorance astounding. White females have displaced white males in managerial and executive positions at a far greater rate than any other demographic, and you are arrogant and dumb enough to attribute this totally to wholesale failure on the part of "EVERY OTHER" demographic? Because "you say so" makes it fact?
That is a ludicrous assumption that is not supported by a single fact or study that you can produce.
If there were "hundreds of thousands" if not "millions" of white people impacted by the placement of non whites in the work place there would be anarchy in the streets. Why is that not the case now?
Even a simpleton like you should realize that the resson is white families have prospered substantially due the wave of success of generated for white females through AA.
How many white female executives have ascended the ranks more quickly between the decades of the 70's though the 90's versus the 60's?
Try looking up and posting something of sustance instead of pulling made up numbers out of your ass.
White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -
If a politician so much as talks about the legitimate interests of white people, they are immediately called a "racist" that is "pandering" to "white grievances".
No advancement of white women could ever make up for the hit to the white family's income and well being that is caused by white male displacement.
The point is that you are pushing normal, intelligent suburbanites into the position that they literally need to be tough and manly to be able survive with any kind of dignity(which they took for granted before, like every individual initially does). In the battle between you pathetic, feminine omegas and normal white people, you will demolished very easily.The point is you "tough guys" are wimpy assholes and cry babies ...all the Alpha Male shit you all talk about is Bull shit ...you all are Punks who can dish out but whine when its served to you ...fuck off weakling wimp- we are not going to ever be Politically correct with Trump supporting shit heads LOL go ahead and cry LolThanks for proving the OP's point....
White people have been deracialized, dipshit. Marginal and mediocre non-whites(like you)literally flourish as a result of this "leveled playing field".The reason there isn't anarchy is because white people have been deracialized.So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"I'm not angry and I certainly dont need to argue, little guy.
His self pitying tantrums like yours are worth little more than a laugh.
There is ample information out there that supports the fact that white females have prospered more than any other demographic from AA.
If you are currently being raised in a dual income household and there is a white female manager or executive in that household, it is doubtful that she would have held that position prior to the era of AA.
You and your cartoon pal should try using Google, it is your friend.
The main point is about who has suffered because of AA, and that is whites. >> ALL whites including women (wives, daughters, mothers of white male AA victims).
Your ignorance astounding. White females have displaced white males in managerial and executive positions at a far greater rate than any other demographic, and you are arrogant and dumb enough to attribute this totally to wholesale failure on the part of "EVERY OTHER" demographic? Because "you say so" makes it fact?
That is a ludicrous assumption that is not supported by a single fact or study that you can produce.
If there were "hundreds of thousands" if not "millions" of white people impacted by the placement of non whites in the work place there would be anarchy in the streets. Why is that not the case now?
Even a simpleton like you should realize that the resson is white families have prospered substantially due the wave of success of generated for white females through AA.
How many white female executives have ascended the ranks more quickly between the decades of the 70's though the 90's versus the 60's?
Try looking up and posting something of sustance instead of pulling made up numbers out of your ass.
White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -
If a politician so much as talks about the legitimate interests of white people, they are immediately called a "racist" that is "pandering" to "white grievances".
No advancement of white women could ever make up for the hit to the white family's income and well being that is caused by white male displacement.
You have got to be joking.
White males are not "victims".
They still represent the vast majority of middle and upper management positions in the work force, even after factoring in the ascencion of white females due to AA, as well as the occasional black or hispanic.
Throughout the history of this country right up to the present, the law makers of this land have been "entitled" white males, so for you to state that "white people have been "deracialized" is nothing but comical nonsense,
Now that the playing field has been lawfully leveled to an extent, what has happened is that the marginal/mediocre lot of white males who by default were not left behind before, are now irrelevant and have to compete fairly without favoritism, and now they are experiencing what women and minorities have for numerous generations.
White people have been deracialized, dipshit. Marginal and mediocre non-whites(like you)literally flourish as a result of this "leveled playing field".The reason there isn't anarchy is because white people have been deracialized.So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"I'm not angry and I certainly dont need to argue, little guy.
His self pitying tantrums like yours are worth little more than a laugh.
There is ample information out there that supports the fact that white females have prospered more than any other demographic from AA.
If you are currently being raised in a dual income household and there is a white female manager or executive in that household, it is doubtful that she would have held that position prior to the era of AA.
You and your cartoon pal should try using Google, it is your friend.
The main point is about who has suffered because of AA, and that is whites. >> ALL whites including women (wives, daughters, mothers of white male AA victims).
Your ignorance astounding. White females have displaced white males in managerial and executive positions at a far greater rate than any other demographic, and you are arrogant and dumb enough to attribute this totally to wholesale failure on the part of "EVERY OTHER" demographic? Because "you say so" makes it fact?
That is a ludicrous assumption that is not supported by a single fact or study that you can produce.
If there were "hundreds of thousands" if not "millions" of white people impacted by the placement of non whites in the work place there would be anarchy in the streets. Why is that not the case now?
Even a simpleton like you should realize that the resson is white families have prospered substantially due the wave of success of generated for white females through AA.
How many white female executives have ascended the ranks more quickly between the decades of the 70's though the 90's versus the 60's?
Try looking up and posting something of sustance instead of pulling made up numbers out of your ass.
White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -
If a politician so much as talks about the legitimate interests of white people, they are immediately called a "racist" that is "pandering" to "white grievances".
No advancement of white women could ever make up for the hit to the white family's income and well being that is caused by white male displacement.
You have got to be joking.
White males are not "victims".
They still represent the vast majority of middle and upper management positions in the work force, even after factoring in the ascencion of white females due to AA, as well as the occasional black or hispanic.
Throughout the history of this country right up to the present, the law makers of this land have been "entitled" white males, so for you to state that "white people have been "deracialized" is nothing but comical nonsense,
Now that the playing field has been lawfully leveled to an extent, what has happened is that the marginal/mediocre lot of white males who by default were not left behind before, are now irrelevant and have to compete fairly without favoritism, and now they are experiencing what women and minorities have for numerous generations.
If white people weren't deracialized this country would not exist the way that it does today. There sure as fuck wouldn't be an anticipation of the day that white people become a minority.
Which makes it even more retarded to believe that racially aware white people would allow themselves to become a minority in the only countries in which we are a majority.White people have been deracialized, dipshit. Marginal and mediocre non-whites(like you)literally flourish as a result of this "leveled playing field".The reason there isn't anarchy is because white people have been deracialized.So what if white females prospered more than any other demographic from AA ? All that shows is the other demographics have chosen other pursuits (drug dealing, robbery, prostitution, etc) than what we call "prosper"
The main point is about who has suffered because of AA, and that is whites. >> ALL whites including women (wives, daughters, mothers of white male AA victims).
Your ignorance astounding. White females have displaced white males in managerial and executive positions at a far greater rate than any other demographic, and you are arrogant and dumb enough to attribute this totally to wholesale failure on the part of "EVERY OTHER" demographic? Because "you say so" makes it fact?
That is a ludicrous assumption that is not supported by a single fact or study that you can produce.
If there were "hundreds of thousands" if not "millions" of white people impacted by the placement of non whites in the work place there would be anarchy in the streets. Why is that not the case now?
Even a simpleton like you should realize that the resson is white families have prospered substantially due the wave of success of generated for white females through AA.
How many white female executives have ascended the ranks more quickly between the decades of the 70's though the 90's versus the 60's?
Try looking up and posting something of sustance instead of pulling made up numbers out of your ass.
White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -
If a politician so much as talks about the legitimate interests of white people, they are immediately called a "racist" that is "pandering" to "white grievances".
No advancement of white women could ever make up for the hit to the white family's income and well being that is caused by white male displacement.
You have got to be joking.
White males are not "victims".
They still represent the vast majority of middle and upper management positions in the work force, even after factoring in the ascencion of white females due to AA, as well as the occasional black or hispanic.
Throughout the history of this country right up to the present, the law makers of this land have been "entitled" white males, so for you to state that "white people have been "deracialized" is nothing but comical nonsense,
Now that the playing field has been lawfully leveled to an extent, what has happened is that the marginal/mediocre lot of white males who by default were not left behind before, are now irrelevant and have to compete fairly without favoritism, and now they are experiencing what women and minorities have for numerous generations.
If white people weren't deracialized this country would not exist the way that it does today. There sure as fuck wouldn't be an anticipation of the day that white people become a minority.
White pepple ARE a minority on this planet, you stupid fuck.
Your issue is that they no longer can relegate minorities on this soil to second class citizenship without reprecussions.
So sit and stew and churn over your outrage over the fact that NOW is your reality...deal with it.
Which makes it even more retarded to believe that racially aware white people would allow themselves to become a minority in the only countries in which we are a majority.White people have been deracialized, dipshit. Marginal and mediocre non-whites(like you)literally flourish as a result of this "leveled playing field".The reason there isn't anarchy is because white people have been deracialized.Your ignorance astounding. White females have displaced white males in managerial and executive positions at a far greater rate than any other demographic, and you are arrogant and dumb enough to attribute this totally to wholesale failure on the part of "EVERY OTHER" demographic? Because "you say so" makes it fact?
That is a ludicrous assumption that is not supported by a single fact or study that you can produce.
If there were "hundreds of thousands" if not "millions" of white people impacted by the placement of non whites in the work place there would be anarchy in the streets. Why is that not the case now?
Even a simpleton like you should realize that the resson is white families have prospered substantially due the wave of success of generated for white females through AA.
How many white female executives have ascended the ranks more quickly between the decades of the 70's though the 90's versus the 60's?
Try looking up and posting something of sustance instead of pulling made up numbers out of your ass.
White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -
If a politician so much as talks about the legitimate interests of white people, they are immediately called a "racist" that is "pandering" to "white grievances".
No advancement of white women could ever make up for the hit to the white family's income and well being that is caused by white male displacement.
You have got to be joking.
White males are not "victims".
They still represent the vast majority of middle and upper management positions in the work force, even after factoring in the ascencion of white females due to AA, as well as the occasional black or hispanic.
Throughout the history of this country right up to the present, the law makers of this land have been "entitled" white males, so for you to state that "white people have been "deracialized" is nothing but comical nonsense,
Now that the playing field has been lawfully leveled to an extent, what has happened is that the marginal/mediocre lot of white males who by default were not left behind before, are now irrelevant and have to compete fairly without favoritism, and now they are experiencing what women and minorities have for numerous generations.
If white people weren't deracialized this country would not exist the way that it does today. There sure as fuck wouldn't be an anticipation of the day that white people become a minority.
White pepple ARE a minority on this planet, you stupid fuck.
Your issue is that they no longer can relegate minorities on this soil to second class citizenship without reprecussions.
So sit and stew and churn over your outrage over the fact that NOW is your reality...deal with it.
White people ARE deracialized, that IS the reality NOW.
The GI Bill was affirmative action for white folk, really devastated american society didn't it.ByHow could anyone be racist against white people?
1. supporting Affirmative Action (for starters)
2. by claiming that Betty Shelby's shooting of Terrence Crutcher was racist (when it clearly was not)
3. etc, etc.
