It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries. The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them. Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites. What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries? How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem? And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this? But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Anti-racist, or anti-white? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Who are they? Everybody doesn’t say that. I’d say you are stupid. What is the black problem? I think your psycho. There is no genocide against the white race. Again who are they? No, anti-racist means opposed to racists. Anti-white means opposed to whites. I suggest a dictionary.
B94, I said that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. IF you are not able to understand that words can be used differently than what it says in some dictionary then it is very hard for me to explain this to you. But it is just like the poster Tank wrote: "Diversity = Less White People" If you look up the word "diversity" in a dictionary it will not say "less white people." But if you hear some anti-white (anti-racist) speak, and says that the city is not diverse enough that means there are too many white people there. That was just one of many examples that anti-racist is always a code word for anti-white!
We don't need less white people. Europe and North America constitute less than 20% of the world's population because our population rates (excluding immigration) have stabilized. What we really need is for Asia, Africa and South America to do the same. China's one child policy should be adopted world wide. That'd be much better for world peace than any kind of forced diversity.
I just love when a point is lost because the person with the point turns it into EXACTLY what he is complaining about.
you cant stop the evolution of time etc....i would never consider interracial marriage or relationship of any kind....my son would not either....has nothing to do with black, mexicans, asians etc....just prefer he stay to his race....my nephew is going out with a vietnamese woman and has been for over 4 year we expect a marriage announcement anytime and will welcome her....my personal feelings do not rule the world...
You must read the entire post. I am saying that anti-racists want immigration into all white countries and they force immigration only into white countries. They demand integration and supports assimilation. The goal is a melting pot where all will be brown. They want a world without white people. And I am saying: what is someone wanted a world without black people? Would they be considered anti-racist or anti-black?
We can stop white genocide. At least you could say it is immoral! But it seems like you are anti-white and that you support a "melting pot" in white countries i.e. white genocide.