Another Way to Use Religion for Political Purposes

Your the one that runs away, when your claims become to ignorant even for your word games to hide.

Really?

Like this recent thread?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=50258&page=5

WE have been round this before, you moron. I have called right wing or conservative members of this board on bad , misleading or incorrect statements. You on the other hand have NEVER said one word EVER about any liberal poster, no matter how bad they get.

Lmao...Joyce and Lieberalism...thats it. I do hope you aren't claiming those two as conservative...they are fucking nutty.

By the way, you forgot to remind us again of how smart you are, maybe you should tell us your IQ and remind us of the classes you attend that a retard like me would never be able to get into.

Ok moron...when I say I am smarter than YOU I am talking to YOU. Unless you have Schizophrenia, that means I am talking to ONE individual. I know you can't stand to have anything represented correctly, but really, this is not an argument between me and "you all", its an argument between me and you.

And I gave this challenge to Bern as well...take the LSAT RGS. And see how you do. You don't need to tell me...you can just compare my score to yours and then re-think really whether you think its acceptable for me to think that I am smarter than you or not.
 
Really?

Like this recent thread?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=50258&page=5



Lmao...Joyce and Lieberalism...thats it. I do hope you aren't claiming those two as conservative...they are fucking nutty.



Ok moron...when I say I am smarter than YOU I am talking to YOU. Unless you have Schizophrenia, that means I am talking to ONE individual. I know you can't stand to have anything represented correctly, but really, this is not an argument between me and "you all", its an argument between me and you.

And I gave this challenge to Bern as well...take the LSAT RGS. And see how you do. You don't need to tell me...you can just compare my score to yours and then re-think really whether you think its acceptable for me to think that I am smarter than you or not.

Red State Rules, Gunny L, Kathieanne Alucard, Nevadamedic, to name a few, but hey I realize it looks better if you pretend otherwise.

And as we can all see from this post your an arrogant prick that thinks he is smarter then everyone else.
 
Red State Rules, Gunny L, Kathieanne Alucard, Nevadamedic, to name a few, but hey I realize it looks better if you pretend otherwise.

I've never seen you disagree with any of those people.

And as we can all see from this post your an arrogant prick that thinks he is smarter then everyone else.

Lmao....guess that means you won't be taking the challenge then, hey?
 
YouTube - skull bones & bush & kerry a WIN WIN for the ...
Skull and Bones, Bin laden family, who is Bush loyal to? I'm ...
2 min 43 sec -
[ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXqJ4sC6EGs[/ame]


YouTube - Bush and Kerry in Skull and Bones
Interview with Bush and Kerry regarding Skull and Bones ...
2 min 39 sec -
[ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pUogbYkoHc[/ame]

you people still believe you live in a two party state
 
My bad, I was using terms as I understood Bully to do, though they seemed 'off'. Secular: ActNow, Act Up, Answer all have followers that haven't a clue. As do the religious through Christian, Jewish, and Muslim entities.


So any and all political groups or movements that arent relgiious based are secular?

Maybe you could provide a defintion of the word "secular" so that we are at least at the same starting point.
 
So any and all political groups or movements that arent relgiious based are secular?

Maybe you could provide a defintion of the word "secular" so that we are at least at the same starting point.

What's the use of that, Ruby? Secular Americans are about as scarse as rocking horse shit!

Better to identify the one sectarian creed that all Americans agree on.

This single para succinctly summarizes the fundamental philosophy behind the affectatious arrogant drivel that our neocon non-coms here, and their gullible but garrulous groupies, spout.

As you have proven, the only Americans who disagree with Calvinism have left the country.

Calvinists also believe that “God’s divine providence [has] selected, elected, and predestined certain people to restore humanity and reconcile it with its Creator.”7 These “Elect” were originally thought to be the only people going to Heaven. To the Calvinists, material success and wealth was a sign that you were one of the Elect, and thus were favored by God. Who better to shepherd a society populated by God’s wayward children

Here, read it all and see why it is utterly useless trying to reason with these irredeemably programmed Golems of that bizarre off-shoot of the fascistic Jewish religion, American Calvinazism.

If anyone but a Koala* Calvinazi spouted the same barbaric bilge that these rat-bags regularly regurgitate in a secular setting, they would spend the rest of their days in a rubber room dressed in a back-to-front, long-sleeved canvas cardigan, that straps up at the back.

Sadly the miniscule sect of chardonnay socialists here will simply lament the Calvinazi’s socially accepted hate has more in common with our credulous cave-dwelling ancestors than with supposed progressive people, and leave it at that.

Whereas I maintain we must completely reverse the Calvinazi hate equation and pitilessly apply their own OT Biblical prescriptions for “sinners” to THEM.

In other words, A FINAL SOLUTION FOR SASSENACH SUCK-HOLING SOUPERS!

Only when all the pussy-whipped two-bob capitalists in the Republican Lite Partei, or DemockRATS, start towing Americhristians by the neck behind their pickup trucks, instead of poofters, will we be rid of Daddy Warbucks and his WASP Sergeants!

Heil Henderson!!


*a protected species
 
What's the use of that, Ruby? Secular Americans are about as scarse as rocking horse shit!

Better to identify the one sectarian creed that all Americans agree on.

This single para succinctly summarizes the fundamental philosophy behind the affectatious arrogant drivel that our neocon non-coms here, and their gullible but garrulous groupies, spout.

As you have proven, the only Americans who disagree with Calvinism have left the country.



Here, read it all and see why it is utterly useless trying to reason with these irredeemably programmed Golems of that bizarre off-shoot of the fascistic Jewish religion, American Calvinazism.

If anyone but a Koala* Calvinazi spouted the same barbaric bilge that these rat-bags regularly regurgitate in a secular setting, they would spend the rest of their days in a rubber room dressed in a back-to-front, long-sleeved canvas cardigan, that straps up at the back.

Sadly the miniscule sect of chardonnay socialists here will simply lament the Calvinazi’s socially accepted hate has more in common with our credulous cave-dwelling ancestors than with supposed progressive people, and leave it at that.

Whereas I maintain we must completely reverse the Calvinazi hate equation and pitilessly apply their own OT Biblical prescriptions for “sinners” to THEM.

In other words, A FINAL SOLUTION FOR SASSENACH SUCK-HOLING SOUPERS!

Only when all the pussy-whipped two-bob capitalists in the Republican Lite Partei, or DemockRATS, start towing Americhristians by the neck behind their pickup trucks, instead of poofters, will we be rid of Daddy Warbucks and his WASP Sergeants!

Heil Henderson!!


*a protected species


I am sure you are quite right, the laughs however are pure icing and its appreciated :)
 
My bad, I was using terms as I understood Bully to do, though they seemed 'off'. Secular: ActNow, Act Up, Answer all have followers that haven't a clue. As do the religious through Christian, Jewish, and Muslim entities.

Don't know anything about "ActNow" etc. Of course there are clueless people everywhere, but one thing I know for sure. If someone claims to believe in religion, there is something wrong with either their education or mental health.

I have not seen proof that even one of the worlds religions is actually correct. I don't care about reading up on religions much as its all bullshit, but figure if any major break throughs had been made I would have seen some article in Nature or such. If I'm wrong I'd love some expert on religion to update me with some proof. Guessing most people are doing what that Gunny dude is doing though, going along with it just in case? :rofl:
 
So any and all political groups or movements that arent relgiious based are secular?

Maybe you could provide a defintion of the word "secular" so that we are at least at the same starting point.

Thats basically the definition of secular...non-religious.
 
Thats basically the definition of secular...non-religious.

Correct:

sec·u·lar /ˈsɛkyələr/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[sek-yuh-ler] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things that are not regarded as religious, spiritual, or sacred; temporal: secular interests.
2. not pertaining to or connected with religion (opposed to sacred): secular music.
3. (of education, a school, etc.) concerned with nonreligious subjects.
4. (of members of the clergy) not belonging to a religious order; not bound by monastic vows (opposed to regular).
5. occurring or celebrated once in an age or century: the secular games of Rome.
6. going on from age to age; continuing through long ages.
–noun
7. a layperson.
8. one of the secular clergy.
 
Thats basically the definition of secular...non-religious.

Pretty silly to identify EVERYTHING that leaves religion out of the equation as a "group" and make statements that "secular groups" dont have a clue...that would cover such a WIDE range of groups that the statement couldnt possibly be accurate.
 
Pretty silly to identify EVERYTHING that leaves religion out of the equation as a "group" and make statements that "secular groups" dont have a clue...that would cover such a WIDE range of groups that the statement couldnt possibly be accurate.

Most generalizations are pretty silly. That one is no exception.
 
I am sure you are quite right, the laughs however are pure icing and its appreciated :)

What is funny - like watching a poor lunatic trying to plait his own shit is funny - is Americans imagining the rest of the world can’t wait to emulate their WASPish ways. Even if half their population has to perish in the process of the almost implausibly compassionate Americans carrying out their “Guard’s” Grand Commission.

I’m sure if those millions of half-starved former Sinic colonials - who had to die because they sinfully wanted to redistribute their common wealth per medium of anti-Christianity communism - could speak now, they would say it was well worth it for the opportunity their survivors might become grossly obese slobs shit-frightened of their own shadow!

I mean, who in their right mind, excluding Swedes, wouldn’t want to be like the know nothing Calvinazi lemmings that infest the USMB? :eusa_think:

I tell ya, Ruby, them thar Aye-rakees, and all the other Ay-rabs, are just like the cock-teasing teeny-bopper jail-bait who lead men on by dressin’ provocatively - in skimpy things like Mu-Mu's and form fitting overcoats! :eusa_drool: :eusa_drool:

They fairly torment a God-fearin’ man with their see-through oil wells, then wail (with secret delight!) when America smacks them about a bit and gives ‘em what they were really hoggin’ for from all get-go – Americanity!
 
Don't know anything about "ActNow" etc. Of course there are clueless people everywhere, but one thing I know for sure. If someone claims to believe in religion, there is something wrong with either their education or mental health.:

First of all moron.... your beliefs are your religion so you can include yourself on your list of the uneducated or mentally challenged ya dope...

Religion: a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:

Not to mention the fact being a follower(I assume by your name)of the "Religion of Darwinism" would make you a ring leader in stupidity, considering the fact that darwin himself said "to believe man evolved is itself absurd"...
 
That's funny, I've seen that tactic used before, "you're an atheist, you worship atheism, therefore you're religious!" And the Darwin one, "you worship evolution, you're religious!"

Religion: a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects

Beliefs Alucard, beliefs. Belief implies faith. Science thrives on doubt and uncertainty. It's not possible to worship "science" because science is a process, a human process, invented by humans to advance our knowledge.

I find it richly amusing when the religious amongst us point to the non-religious amongst us and accuse of being "religious". It's not offensive, just amusing. It's also a bit sad to see that some of us simply don't understand the difference. Follow your faith by all means Alucard, and others, but try to keep a clear mind.
 
That's funny, I've seen that tactic used before, "you're an atheist, you worship atheism, therefore you're religious!" And the Darwin one, "you worship evolution, you're religious!"

Religion: a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects

Beliefs Alucard, beliefs. Belief implies faith. Science thrives on doubt and uncertainty. It's not possible to worship "science" because science is a process, a human process, invented by humans to advance our knowledge.

I find it richly amusing when the religious amongst us point to the non-religious amongst us and accuse of being "religious". It's not offensive, just amusing. It's also a bit sad to see that some of us simply don't understand the difference. Follow your faith by all means Alucard, and others, but try to keep a clear mind.

According to some Religion is a process, a human process, invented by humans to control our societies.

And the claim one can not have a "belief" in science is ludicrous on its face.
 
According to some Religion is a process, a human process, invented by humans to control our societies.

And the claim one can not have a "belief" in science is ludicrous on its face.


Yea I just KNEW you wouldnt be able to keep a clear head! LOL.

Believing somthing that is based on reason and evidence is not at all the same thing as a belief system based on faith *faith meaning believing without need for evidence".
 
First of all moron.... your beliefs are your religion so you can include yourself on your list of the uneducated or mentally challenged ya dope...

Religion: a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:

Not to mention the fact being a follower(I assume by your name)of the "Religion of Darwinism" would make you a ring leader in stupidity, considering the fact that darwin himself said "to believe man evolved is itself absurd"...


How Ironic you call someone else a moron and then go on to make completely moronic statements. I guess the concept of irony is also beyond your grasp!
 
Yea I just KNEW you wouldnt be able to keep a clear head! LOL.

Believing somthing that is based on reason and evidence is not at all the same thing as a belief system based on faith *faith meaning believing without need for evidence".

Except it is still "belief", reread the quote in my post or the original post I got it from. He is insisting one can only belief something if faith is involved.

Now on a separate note, I can show that faith is involved in Science. Science uses educated guess work, based on assumptions, to create and "test" theories and hypothese. Faith occurs when one believes something with out absolute proof of it's existance. Happens all the time in science.

That they test the theories and such does not eliminate the core "faith" that A) the system used will work and B) Science will solve all problems.
 

Forum List

Back
Top