Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by KittenKoder, Jun 4, 2009.
You aren't smart enough to be Cartman ... sorry.
Select any political topic on this board and I will successfully defeat you in a one-on-one debate about it. Until then, you just .
When your horn is worn out, I've got a spare....
When people decide to attempt to make flippant remarks, I simply hold them responsible for supporting them.
You don't pay much attention.
1. Cartman's intellect isn't in debate, so you would still not prove anything. He is an "evil genius" ... kinda like Dr. Evil on Austin Powers, great at destroying people's lives and ruining everything, but too stupid to get away with it.
2. You haven't been able to even keep up with my insults, how would you be able to debate against me? You can't see past the nose on your face enough to counter anything that is not a talking point.
I can see that ... LOL ... awesome pick.
...then there shouldn't have been a basis for comparison anyway on this board.
Your "insults" aren't funny. You're the person who doesn't hear the silence in the room after each and every one of their jokes.
That's rather laughable. I have no qualms about admitting that I'm the most politically extreme individual on this board, which should already indicate to you that I neither advance nor counter "talking points." And more than being one of the few anarchists on a conventional political message board, I'm one of only two people that I've encountered in the past year or so with sufficient knowledge of labor economics to identify the inefficiencies of a capitalist economic structure, which is my major point of focus.
As for yoou, you're not capable of acquiring new information, from what I've seen. No matter how many times an argument or some other evidence is repeated to you, you sullenly mumble that your original position is still right.
Really, do you have any scruples or non-talking points? I have respect of my own ideals to not spin on them, and no, not once have I been proven wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt on the few I don't change position on ... but yeah ... you've read ALL my posts and should know that already *eye roll*. Go back to downloading pics of Sarah Michelle Geller ... mmmkay?
"I challenge you to prove that" is far more effective than "I can run circles around you"
Your statement did nothing in the "holding responsible" category.
I suspect that you haven't read many of my posts; I always attempt to refer to empirical research to validate my comments and there's no pro-capitalists here who have been able to challenge my assessment from a labor economics perspective, which is why everyone runs away when I mention monopsony power or oligopsony.
I don't know or care who Sarah Michelle Geller is, though I suspect it's merely another joke of yours destined to fall flat on its face. That said, the fact that the idea of downloading pics of her originated in your mind and not mine tells us more about you than you'd care to reveal...
Separate names with a comma.