CDZ Another Question for Gun Owners

[Pumpkin Row]

So, are you now trying to argue that nobody has to defend themselves ever?

You arrived at THAT conclusion from sitting on a toilet bowl and grimacing a bit.

How often have YOU had to defend yourself with a military-style type of weapon? Come on, be just a tiny bit honest.

I came to that conclusion because you're advocating a ban on Assault Rifles, meaning criminals can use them and law-abiding citizens can't. You're essentially weakening citizens so they're easier targets for criminals.

People defend themselves a lot more often than you seem to think.

So, you're expecting a criminal (or the dreaded Federal black-booted thugs) to use assault weapons to invade your house....and you're ready to fight thwm off with YOUR assault rifle.....is THAT the scenario your sick mind is envisioning?

I fail to see how that's sick. It's logical. If a thug felt like robbing someone, or just killing a person or people, then they'd want a weapon like that. It's better to be prepared than to just assume it would never happen.

 

[DarkFury]

However the recent SCOTUS decision NOT to hear an anti assault weapons ban shows that the SCOTUS does not particularly care about assault weapons one way or the other.

So the states and cities are free to ban them if they wish.

As sane as that may sound, its a foolish errand.........You can ban all the gun purchases you may want in D.C. but a would be criminal from that city, just has to take a Metro ride to Virginia and buy all the guns he or she wants.

If you are a drug dealer just call Obama. He ships military grade FREE.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

You're far more likely to meet other criminals, especially on the Deep Web. Your scenario is invalid. Besides, this administration showed us that they're more than happy to provide criminals with weapons, no strings attached.

It would have easier and more honest if you just skipped the questions and admit that you have no fucking idea on how to answer them.....But, of course, you couldn't pass up yur moronic accusation of the dreaded Obama administration....What an asshole you must surely be.

You must have forgotten the Fast and Furious scandal. It's not an accusation, it's something that actually happened.

 

[DarkFury]

You're far more likely to meet other criminals, especially on the Deep Web. Your scenario is invalid. Besides, this administration showed us that they're more than happy to provide criminals with weapons, no strings attached.

It would have easier and more honest if you just skipped the questions and admit that you have no fucking idea on how to answer them.....But, of course, you couldn't pass up yur moronic accusation of the dreaded Obama administration....What an asshole you must surely be.

This IS the CDZ you know. She flags you she has you.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

If you are a drug dealer just call Obama. He ships military grade FREE.

Is that how you got your little bb guns?(what an asshole, and all the other morons who actually believe that bullshit.)

Again, the Fast and Furious scandal. Also, calling names? I see we're going for a mature, reasonable discussion here.

 

[DarkFury]

If you are a drug dealer just call Obama. He ships military grade FREE.

Is that how you got your little bb guns?(what an asshole, and all the other morons who actually believe that bullshit.)

It was proven Holder shipped guns to the drug cartel.

 

[nat4900]

It was proven Holder shipped guns to the drug cartel.

So, YOUR "rationale" is that Holder and Obama are now part of a drug cartel?? Just asking for reference sake.

 

[DarkFury]

It was proven Holder shipped guns to the drug cartel.

So, YOUR "rationale" is that Holder and Obama are now part of a drug cartel?? Just asking for reference sake.

THEY sold guns to a drug cartel.

 

[GaryDog]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

Thinking that a ban on assault weapons would somehow get them out of the hands of criminals, who by definition don't follow the law, is not common sense, it's lack thereof. The government in question would only be weakening the ability of citizens to defend themselves, while criminals would continue being able to use them. We've already had MANY stupid threads like this.

Nevermind that it's worked in every major industrialized country on earth. Except ours.

Cuz, you know. Murica.

 

[GaryDog]

So, are you now trying to argue that nobody has to defend themselves ever?

You arrived at THAT conclusion from sitting on a toilet bowl and grimacing a bit.

How often have YOU had to defend yourself with a military-style type of weapon? Come on, be just a tiny bit honest.

I came to that conclusion because you're advocating a ban on Assault Rifles, meaning criminals can use them and law-abiding citizens can't. You're essentially weakening citizens so they're easier targets for criminals.

People defend themselves a lot more often than you seem to think.

So, you're expecting a criminal (or the dreaded Federal black-booted thugs) to use assault weapons to invade your house....and you're ready to fight thwm off with YOUR assault rifle.....is THAT the scenario your sick mind is envisioning?

I fail to see how that's sick. It's logical. If a thug felt like robbing someone, or just killing a person or people, then they'd want a weapon like that. It's better to be prepared than to just assume it would never happen.

That's one take.

To play devil's advocate, when you have a loaded gun in your house you're 5x more likely to end up shooting a loved one or yourself than a home invader. So....there's that.

 

[oldsoul]

Other laws don't hinder the ability of citizens to defend themselves.

here is a right wing moron who must "defend" herself on a fucking daily basis....right nitwit?

Do you not understand the premise of the CDZ?

 

[oldsoul]

You're far more likely to meet other criminals, especially on the Deep Web. Your scenario is invalid. Besides, this administration showed us that they're more than happy to provide criminals with weapons, no strings attached.

It would have easier and more honest if you just skipped the questions and admit that you have no fucking idea on how to answer them.....But, of course, you couldn't pass up yur moronic accusation of the dreaded Obama administration....What an asshole you must surely be.

Can you explain to me how "shall not be infringed." is somehow unclear or even debatable?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

You're far more likely to meet other criminals, especially on the Deep Web. Your scenario is invalid. Besides, this administration showed us that they're more than happy to provide criminals with weapons, no strings attached.

It would have easier and more honest if you just skipped the questions and admit that you have no fucking idea on how to answer them.....But, of course, you couldn't pass up yur moronic accusation of the dreaded Obama administration....What an asshole you must surely be.

Can you explain to me how "shall not be infringed." is somehow unclear or even debatable?

Liberals don't believe in the constitution... or rights... or anything that isn't expansion of government.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So, are you now trying to argue that nobody has to defend themselves ever?

You arrived at THAT conclusion from sitting on a toilet bowl and grimacing a bit.

How often have YOU had to defend yourself with a military-style type of weapon? Come on, be just a tiny bit honest.

I came to that conclusion because you're advocating a ban on Assault Rifles, meaning criminals can use them and law-abiding citizens can't. You're essentially weakening citizens so they're easier targets for criminals.

People defend themselves a lot more often than you seem to think.

So, you're expecting a criminal (or the dreaded Federal black-booted thugs) to use assault weapons to invade your house....and you're ready to fight thwm off with YOUR assault rifle.....is THAT the scenario your sick mind is envisioning?

I fail to see how that's sick. It's logical. If a thug felt like robbing someone, or just killing a person or people, then they'd want a weapon like that. It's better to be prepared than to just assume it would never happen.

That's one take.

To play devil's advocate, when you have a loaded gun in your house you're 5x more likely to end up shooting a loved one or yourself than a home invader. So....there's that.

And my 3 decades of gun ownership show I am not likely to shoot anyone in my house so what's 5 times ZERO?

 

[oldsoul]

You're far more likely to meet other criminals, especially on the Deep Web. Your scenario is invalid. Besides, this administration showed us that they're more than happy to provide criminals with weapons, no strings attached.

It would have easier and more honest if you just skipped the questions and admit that you have no fucking idea on how to answer them.....But, of course, you couldn't pass up yur moronic accusation of the dreaded Obama administration....What an asshole you must surely be.

Can you explain to me how "shall not be infringed." is somehow unclear or even debatable?

Liberals don't believe in the constitution... or rights... or anything that isn't expansion of government.

That's not necessarily true of ALL liberals, but many, yes. The rest try to twist the constitution in an attempt to make it mean what they want.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

Thinking that a ban on assault weapons would somehow get them out of the hands of criminals, who by definition don't follow the law, is not common sense, it's lack thereof. The government in question would only be weakening the ability of citizens to defend themselves, while criminals would continue being able to use them. We've already had MANY stupid threads like this.

Nevermind that it's worked in every major industrialized country on earth. Except ours.

Cuz, you know. Murica.

I guess if you get REALLY high and then read the statistics, then they could say that.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Other laws don't hinder the ability of citizens to defend themselves.

here is a right wing moron who must "defend" herself on a fucking daily basis....right nitwit?

You're in the CDZ, dude.

 

[2aguy]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

That isn't even close to being true.......

In 2014 rifles of all kinds murdered 248 people....

Knives mirdered 1,567

The majority of all gun murder occurs with pistols...not rifles.

 

[2aguy]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

actually.....police chiefs appointed by anti gun politicians have been against rifles.....normal police are not...

 

[2aguy]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

France has banned rifles with detachable magazines and they are completely illegal...you can't buy them in gun stores, they don't have gun stores, you can't buy them at gun shows...they don't have gun shows........

Criminals and terrorists in France get fully automatic rifles and weapons easily......



Paris attacks highlight France's gun control problems

But in recent years a black market has proliferated. The number of illegal weapons has risen at a rapid rate – double-digit percentages – for several years, according to the National Observatory for Delinquency, a body created in 2003.

“In Marseille and the surrounding area almost all the score settling is carried out using weapons used in wars,” a police spokesman told Reuters after the Toulouse attacks, adding that Kalashnikovs were the weapon of choice: “If you don’t have a ‘Kalash’ you’re a bit of a loser.”