Another Flop For The Warmists

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
What????

Another failed prediction????

Yup......oceans not warming as fast as claimed.


"Scientists acknowledge key errors in study of how fast the oceans are warming

A major study claimed the oceans were warming much faster than previously thought. But researchers now say they can’t necessarily make that claim.

Scientists behind a major study that claimed the Earth’s oceans are warming faster than previously thought now say their work contained inadvertent errors that made their conclusions seem more certain than they actually are."
Scientists acknowledge key errors in study of how fast the oceans are warming



See this?
"...their work contained inadvertent errors..."


Just as all those of us have been saying......the scam has lots of "intended errors."



Oh, well.....another foot-in-the-mouth for the warmists.

And there are dopes still defending the con game.
 
What????

Another failed prediction????

Yup......oceans not warming as fast as claimed.


"Scientists acknowledge key errors in study of how fast the oceans are warming

A major study claimed the oceans were warming much faster than previously thought. But researchers now say they can’t necessarily make that claim.

Scientists behind a major study that claimed the Earth’s oceans are warming faster than previously thought now say their work contained inadvertent errors that made their conclusions seem more certain than they actually are."
Scientists acknowledge key errors in study of how fast the oceans are warming



See this?
"...their work contained inadvertent errors..."


Just as all those of us have been saying......the scam has lots of "intended errors."



Oh, well.....another foot-in-the-mouth for the warmists.

And there are dopes still defending the con game.
And the research keeps being fudged year after year....Yet the religious fanatics will never pull their head out of their asses....God is smiling on the retarded liberals...

Untitled.jpg
 
We should be so lucky that these errors were inadvertent...



You appear to be suggesting that Rule #1 is in effect.....

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.


Next thing you'll be saying is there is gambling at "Rick's Café Américain"
 
About 10 different global warming so called scientists called out Governor Brown for linking global warming to wild fires...they told him that it would be impossible to link the two events and wish he would stop politicizing climate change....no surprise that there was no response from Brown's office....what a scumbag!
 
We should be so lucky that these errors were inadvertent...



You appear to be suggesting that Rule #1 is in effect.....

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.


Next thing you'll be saying is there is gambling at "Rick's Café Américain"

No, I am suggesting science should be able to give us reproducible mathematical models verified by other scientists. In climate science this seems to happen only when they are in peer review groups.
 
We should be so lucky that these errors were inadvertent...



You appear to be suggesting that Rule #1 is in effect.....

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.


Next thing you'll be saying is there is gambling at "Rick's Café Américain"
That is conservatives best action is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
 
There is no such thing as settled science.....no one knows if or why or how long or how short weather events will continue.....no one...if they tell you they do they are lying.....
 
We should be so lucky that these errors were inadvertent...



You appear to be suggesting that Rule #1 is in effect.....

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.


Next thing you'll be saying is there is gambling at "Rick's Café Américain"

No, I am suggesting science should be able to give us reproducible mathematical models verified by other scientists. In climate science this seems to happen only when they are in peer review groups.


"peer review" is as political as the scam itself.

'Scientists' know where the grant money comes from.
 
"peer review" is as political as the scam itself.

'Scientists' know where the grant money comes from.

Absolutely, you have to be approved to be on a peer review panel. Grant money is rarely spent to prove everything is already perfectly safe.
 

Forum List

Back
Top