Another Failed Presidency

Philobeado

Gold Member
Apr 8, 2009
566
174
178
Gulf of Mexico Coast, Texas
Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson.


In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China.
But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.


But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?
But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, is historically illiterate, and woefully small minded for the size of the task-- all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.


In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us--financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job. Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too.
Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.


Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.
American Thinker: Another Failed Presidency
 
I sure am glad these one term Presidents are so easy to pick out... Counting the days until he is sent packing...
 
I stopped reading the minute that no Republican was mentioned in the opening couple of statements. The fact that Dubya alone wasn't mentioned is showing the partisan of the article.

Calling LBJ a failed Presidency and Dubya's not is pure partisan hackery.
 
ah I love you fuckers that don't include the Scrub (or Shrub as the case might be) on failed Presidencies , christ even 41, his old man spend more time with Slick Willy than he did with his moron son
 
I stopped reading the minute that no Republican was mentioned in the opening couple of statements. The fact that Dubya alone wasn't mentioned is showing the partisan of the article.

Calling LBJ a failed Presidency and Dubya's not is pure partisan hackery.

nixon....third sentence....
 
nixon....third sentence....

Did you even bother to read the sentence? It was DEFENDING every single Republican.

Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, YET his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China.

George Bush Jr didn't fail so much as he was perceived to have been too much of a patrician while being uncomfortable with his more conservative allies. Yet George Bush Sr is still perceived as a man of uncommon decency, loyal to the enduring American character of rugged self-determination, free markets, and generosity. George W will eventually be treated more kindly by historians as one whose potential was squashed by his own compromise of conservative principles, in some ways repeating the mistakes of his father, while ignoring many lessons in executive leadership he should have learned at Harvard Business School

"Read my lips, no new taxes."

Read MY lips, this is hackery.
 
I'm not so sure Clinton should be a member of the "failed President" club. He taught us all some rather unique ways to store cigars...
 
Failed Presidency?

1. Entered office with the economy headed for depression. Inacted measures to halt and turnaround an economy in freefall

2. Dow Jones UP 40%, housing sales rebounding, manufacturing up, index of leading economic indicators up for fourth month in a row

3. Personally enacted steps to rebuild the failing relationships with foreign nations

4. Reinacted legislation protecting the environment

5. Started troop pullback from combat zones in Iraq. Accelerated attacks on Talliban

6. Reinstated funding for stem cell research

7. Initiated health care reform

8. Kept America safe longer than George Bush did

Not too shabby for just 8 months work. Imagine the accomplishments in 8 years?
 
obama does not care if he fails, he is only there to do as much damage as he possibly can, he wants to wreck this nation and he is on track to doing just that.
 
I stopped reading the minute that no Republican was mentioned in the opening couple of statements. The fact that Dubya alone wasn't mentioned is showing the partisan of the article.

Calling LBJ a failed Presidency and Dubya's not is pure partisan hackery.

Actually, your post in response is the pure partisan hackery.
 
ah I love you fuckers that don't include the Scrub (or Shrub as the case might be) on failed Presidencies , christ even 41, his old man spend more time with Slick Willy than he did with his moron son

Fact is, he won't be included. Get over it and move on. Only you flaming retards from the last 8 years think anything fo the sort, and obviously don't know jack about history beyond your own partisan, swiss cheese brains.
 
Historically, our greatest presidents have had two things in common...
1. They followed horrible presidents- Lincoln followed Buchannon, FDR followed Hoover, Reagan followed Carter. Obama follows Bush rated as the 39th of 43 presidents

2. They faced extreme challenges- Lincoln faced the Civil War, FDR faced a depression and WWII, Reagan faced the Cold War and the Carter recession. Obama comes in facing the worst recession in 70 years and wars on two fronts.

Obama has been in 8 months. During that time, he enacted economic measures to reverse an economy on the brink of collapse. Leading economic experts predict an end to the recesssion by late fall. Obama refocused the two wars, de-emphasizing the Iraq war and going after the Taliban in Afghanistan. After over 80 years of trying, the nation is on the verge of its first comprehensive health care plan.

Obama has alot of work remaining, but all signs point to a top 10 presidency
 
nixon....third sentence....

Did you even bother to read the sentence? It was DEFENDING every single Republican.

Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, YET his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China.

George Bush Jr didn't fail so much as he was perceived to have been too much of a patrician while being uncomfortable with his more conservative allies. Yet George Bush Sr is still perceived as a man of uncommon decency, loyal to the enduring American character of rugged self-determination, free markets, and generosity. George W will eventually be treated more kindly by historians as one whose potential was squashed by his own compromise of conservative principles, in some ways repeating the mistakes of his father, while ignoring many lessons in executive leadership he should have learned at Harvard Business School

"Read my lips, no new taxes."

Read MY lips, this is hackery.

From the horse's mouth, no less ....:eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top