Another Diplomatic Immunity Perv Walks

[Flanders]

United Nations headquartered in New York City makes it the freak capital of the world —— no country has as many freaks gathered in one place, and that does not count an army of degenerates servicing the freaks. Unfortunately, the freaks with diplomatic immunity can branch out:

A diplomat from Sudan was arrested for allegedly grinding against a woman on a Manhattan subway Monday — but the charges were dropped because he has diplomatic immunity, police sources said.

XXXXX​

The Sudanese Mission to the United Nations did not return calls or e-mail requests for comment.

Diplomat busted for grinding against woman on subway released thanks to immunity
By Tina Moore and Shawn Cohen
January 9, 2017 | 7:28pm

Diplomat busted for grinding against woman on subway released thanks to immunity​

Withdrawing from the UN is the ideal.

H. R. 1205 Is Looking Good

Until withdrawal is done, deny diplomatic immunity to everyone connected to the United Nations. Remember that United Nations diplomatic immunity is not the same as diplomatic immunity that attaches to foreign embassy personnel. Indeed, I always said that DI should only attach to ambassadors and their immediate families.

In fact, I would do away with diplomatic immunity altogether after the United Nations is history.

 

[WillowTree]

Time to head em up and move em out!

 

[Manonthestreet]

God help you if UN sends "peacekeepers" to your country

 

[westwall]

God help you if UN sends "peacekeepers" to your country

Yes indeed. Want to find sex slaves? Go to a UN regulated area. Below are a very few of the reports that have come out over the years. I used to work in UN areas and while there are some very, very good, and committed people, there are also some of the worst of the worst involved.

Bolkovac: 'UN tries to cover up peacekeeper sex abuse scandal' | Europe | DW.COM | 29.02.2016

Child sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers - Wikipedia

Report reveals shame of UN peacekeepers

Has the UN learned lessons of Bosnian sex slavery revealed in Rachel Weisz film?

 

[aris2chat]

United Nations headquartered in New York City makes it the freak capital of the world —— no country has as many freaks gathered in one place, and that does not count an army of degenerates servicing the freaks. Unfortunately, the freaks with diplomatic immunity can branch out:

A diplomat from Sudan was arrested for allegedly grinding against a woman on a Manhattan subway Monday — but the charges were dropped because he has diplomatic immunity, police sources said.

XXXXX​

The Sudanese Mission to the United Nations did not return calls or e-mail requests for comment.

Diplomat busted for grinding against woman on subway released thanks to immunity
By Tina Moore and Shawn Cohen
January 9, 2017 | 7:28pm

Diplomat busted for grinding against woman on subway released thanks to immunity​

Withdrawing from the UN is the ideal.

H. R. 1205 Is Looking Good

Until withdrawal is done, deny diplomatic immunity to everyone connected to the United Nations. Remember that United Nations diplomatic immunity is not the same as diplomatic immunity that attaches to foreign embassy personnel. Indeed, I always said that DI should only attach to ambassadors and their immediate families.

In fact, I would do away with diplomatic immunity altogether after the United Nations is history.

Modern diplomatic immunity might be detailed in 1961, but the principles go back to ancient times.

With or without the UN, they would exist, but I would like to see some reforms to them where the country is held responsible for reimbursement of some kind for crimes/mistakes their protected diplomats make.

 

[Flanders]

the principles go back to ancient times.

With or without the UN, they would exist,

To aris2chat: The UN —— AN ORGANIZATION —— has DI authority the ancients never conceived. Even the UN in 1945 never envisioned this:

Clinton control explains why the DoJ, and FBI directors like James Comey, will never indict a well-connected Democrat, and, by extension, never investigate anything that might uncover treason committed for the United Nations. Indeed, both agencies rolled over faster than two dollar whores when Taqiyya the Liar gave INTERPOL diplomatic immunity over American law enforcement.​

The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending-executive-order-12425

It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.

By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates—now operates—on American soil, its officers and property beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. . . this immunity and protection—and elevation above the US Constitution—afforded INTERPOL is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). INTERPOL provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice. . . Two critical matters are at play. One is an overall matter of sovereignty and the concept of the primacy of American laws above those of the rest of the world. But more recently a more overriding concern principally has been the potential—if not likely—specter of subjecting our Armed Forces to a hostile international body seeking war crimes prosecutions during the execution of an unpopular war. . .​

XXXXX​

In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama's Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans' 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.​

Wither Sovereignty
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009

ThreatsWatch.Org: PrincipalAnalysis: Wither Sovereignty​

A Cabal Of National Embarrassment

Or this:

Emails: Clinton Foundation exec sought diplomatic passport
By Katie Bo Williams - 09/01/16 03:58 PM EDT

Emails: Clinton Foundation exec sought diplomatic passport​

And this diplomatic passport (diplomatic immunity) took the prize:

Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s world came tumbling down when he made the move on a hotel maid in NYC. S-K’s biggest mistake was not putting his wife in charge of bimbo eruptions.

The story was delicious because Strauss-Kahn was the head of the IMF —— a specialized United Nations agency. He was also a Socialist who was in line to become France’s president.

Laissez-passer was the part that fascinated me about S-K’s legal problems in NYC when he surrendered his passport. Concerned New Yorkers felt better when he gave it up no matter what it is. Eventually, I learned that laissez-passer is French doublespeak for diplomatic passport? To be precise, a laissez-passer is an alternative travel document issued by the United Nations. I remember asking “Where do I get one?”

The more I learned the more I smelled a rat because a laissez-passer can be issued by an organization —— any organization. To make Strauss-Kahn give it up along with his passport gave laissez-passers a legitimacy they are not entitled to. Logically, the judge should have made Strauss-Kahn surrender his library card, too.

Just how much weight a government gives to a laissez-passer is another matter entirely. Adolf Eichmann escaped from Nazi Germany on a travel document issued by the International Red Cross. Argentina had no obligation to accept it but it did. Presumably, a little money changed hands.

The good Lord only knows how many corporate CEOs have one in their back pockets; nevertheless, who do you think has access to laissez-passers? The answer is big shots whether they be CEOs, or government officials fleeing from a failed government like Adolf Eichmann, or well-connected criminals. In short: They are nothing more than an escape hatch for the worst people in every country. Put it this way, every law-abiding American can get a passport, but how many Americans can get a “travel document” from the United Nations?

Question: How many Muslim terrorists have laissez-passers issued by the United Nations?

Parenthetically, the NY judge who lifted Strauss-Kahn’s laissez-passer made a big mistake. Had S-K been allowed to keep his laissez-passer he might have used it to jump bail. Jumping bail on a laissez-passer would have showed Americans exactly why those things should not be recognized as legal travel documents, at least not in this country.

After S-K returned to France he was accused of rape by French writer Tristane Banon. I do not recall how that turned out, but S-K’s publicity made Bill Clinton squirm because it reminded Americans of Juanita Broaddrick:​

Clinton Accuser's Story Aired
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 25, 1999

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused​

A little Clinton humor did surface in 2012 when Strauss-Kahn was first arrested for sleeping with working girls. S-K denied knowing that the women he slept with were prostitutes. His defense was that he did not know he was sleeping with prostitutes because the women were all naked at the time.

Not even Bill Clinton’s “IS” could top that story.​

Strauss-Kahn Topped Bill Clinton

 

[aris2chat]

the principles go back to ancient times.

With or without the UN, they would exist,

To aris2chat: The UN —— AN ORGANIZATION —— has DI authority the ancients never conceived. Even the UN in 1945 never envisioned this:

Clinton control explains why the DoJ, and FBI directors like James Comey, will never indict a well-connected Democrat, and, by extension, never investigate anything that might uncover treason committed for the United Nations. Indeed, both agencies rolled over faster than two dollar whores when Taqiyya the Liar gave INTERPOL diplomatic immunity over American law enforcement.​

The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending-executive-order-12425

It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.

By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates—now operates—on American soil, its officers and property beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. . . this immunity and protection—and elevation above the US Constitution—afforded INTERPOL is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). INTERPOL provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice. . . Two critical matters are at play. One is an overall matter of sovereignty and the concept of the primacy of American laws above those of the rest of the world. But more recently a more overriding concern principally has been the potential—if not likely—specter of subjecting our Armed Forces to a hostile international body seeking war crimes prosecutions during the execution of an unpopular war. . .​

XXXXX​

In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama's Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans' 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.​

Wither Sovereignty
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009

ThreatsWatch.Org: PrincipalAnalysis: Wither Sovereignty​

A Cabal Of National Embarrassment

Or this:

Emails: Clinton Foundation exec sought diplomatic passport
By Katie Bo Williams - 09/01/16 03:58 PM EDT

Emails: Clinton Foundation exec sought diplomatic passport​

And this diplomatic passport (diplomatic immunity) took the prize:

Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s world came tumbling down when he made the move on a hotel maid in NYC. S-K’s biggest mistake was not putting his wife in charge of bimbo eruptions.

The story was delicious because Strauss-Kahn was the head of the IMF —— a specialized United Nations agency. He was also a Socialist who was in line to become France’s president.

Laissez-passer was the part that fascinated me about S-K’s legal problems in NYC when he surrendered his passport. Concerned New Yorkers felt better when he gave it up no matter what it is. Eventually, I learned that laissez-passer is French doublespeak for diplomatic passport? To be precise, a laissez-passer is an alternative travel document issued by the United Nations. I remember asking “Where do I get one?”

The more I learned the more I smelled a rat because a laissez-passer can be issued by an organization —— any organization. To make Strauss-Kahn give it up along with his passport gave laissez-passers a legitimacy they are not entitled to. Logically, the judge should have made Strauss-Kahn surrender his library card, too.

Just how much weight a government gives to a laissez-passer is another matter entirely. Adolf Eichmann escaped from Nazi Germany on a travel document issued by the International Red Cross. Argentina had no obligation to accept it but it did. Presumably, a little money changed hands.

The good Lord only knows how many corporate CEOs have one in their back pockets; nevertheless, who do you think has access to laissez-passers? The answer is big shots whether they be CEOs, or government officials fleeing from a failed government like Adolf Eichmann, or well-connected criminals. In short: They are nothing more than an escape hatch for the worst people in every country. Put it this way, every law-abiding American can get a passport, but how many Americans can get a “travel document” from the United Nations?

Question: How many Muslim terrorists have laissez-passers issued by the United Nations?

Parenthetically, the NY judge who lifted Strauss-Kahn’s laissez-passer made a big mistake. Had S-K been allowed to keep his laissez-passer he might have used it to jump bail. Jumping bail on a laissez-passer would have showed Americans exactly why those things should not be recognized as legal travel documents, at least not in this country.

After S-K returned to France he was accused of rape by French writer Tristane Banon. I do not recall how that turned out, but S-K’s publicity made Bill Clinton squirm because it reminded Americans of Juanita Broaddrick:​

Clinton Accuser's Story Aired
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 25, 1999

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused​

A little Clinton humor did surface in 2012 when Strauss-Kahn was first arrested for sleeping with working girls. S-K denied knowing that the women he slept with were prostitutes. His defense was that he did not know he was sleeping with prostitutes because the women were all naked at the time.

Not even Bill Clinton’s “IS” could top that story.​

Strauss-Kahn Topped Bill Clinton

The overall DI needs a major minimization. I understand for the major diplomats but all the support staff and family or NGOs, no they should no all have the same, if they get any it should be limited.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Every thread is like "Something happened, Desolve it all"

This guy grinds on a chick?...Away with the UN
Dont like a news story?....Press is useless
Wall Street duped?....Regulations are pointless

Etc etc....You guys act like there is some instance of something somewhere that has a stellar record without a blemish. If there is one?....Kill the whole thing.

Why?

 

[Flanders]

Every thread is like "Something happened, Desolve it all".

Why?

To ClosedCaption: The answer is obvious. Dissolve it whenever it violates the U.S. Constitution, strengthens a priesthood, enforces global government, funds big government ideology, and legitimates Socialists dictating the behavior of law-abiding Americans. To be precise:

abate
abrogate
annihilate
annul
call off
cancel
destroy
disestablish
end
eradicate
erase
expunge
extinguish
extirpate
finish
inhibit
invalidate
kill
negate
nix
nullify
obliterate
overthrow
overturn
prohibit
put an end to
put the kibosh on
quash
repeal
repudiate
rescind
revoke
scrub
set aside
squelch
stamp out
subvert
supersede
suppress
terminate
undo
vacate
vitiate
void
wipe out
zap

 

[Flanders]

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gv012317dAPR20170123054537.jpg

Diplomatic Immunity for INTERPOL should go to the shredder with the first load:

The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425."

 

[leftwinger]

CC, don't worry. I feel stupid also, not only you. These threads make me tired......very tired. hang in there, kkk (no pun).

 

[Flanders]

Withdrawing from the UN is the ideal.

H. R. 1205 Is Looking Good

I wonder what this UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT would say if President Trump actually moves towards withdrawal:

European Union Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker says he will support U.S. states that want to secede from the union if President Donald Trump continues supporting Brexit. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)​

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/GettyImages-660487014-1280x720.jpg

EU president threatens to ‘break up’ US over Trump’s Brexit support
Tré Goins-Phillips

EU president threatens to 'break up' US over Trump’s Brexit​

 

[aris2chat]

considering the US pays most of the UN, it would probably go under

 

[bob5463]

considering the US pays most of the UN, it would probably go under

Does the US pay actually? The United Nations Debt: Who Owes Whom?,
They argue there is no debt as no debt can be claimed.

Are you guy aware that diplomatic immunity can also be purchased?
Have a look at a site selling diplomatic passports and there are many others where this once is coming from.