Another Dem Disaster Day: Dem Witnesses - No Bribery / Quid Pro Quo

What exact personal gain did the President receive from asking the Ukraine PM to look into Democrats colluding with former criminal Ukraine officials to target US citizens (Manafort & Trump) and to interfere in a US Presidential election, ensuring they would not do so again?

What exact personal gain did the President receive from asking the Ukraine PM to look into a former VP's videotaped confession of extorting the PM's predecessor to protect his son who was working for a notorious Ukraine criminal?

How has the President physically prevented grown adults from choosing to testify, except perhaps with the same legal tools wielded by former Presidents?

Show me the EXACT law that requires a President to testify in an Inquisition in which his Constitutional Rights have been trampled, where there is no crime, no evidence of crime, no whistleblower, no witnesses...and 'witnesses' SCHIFF has called have declared the accusations against the President are FALSE.

Show me the President's videotaped admission of guilt, like the one Biden gave.

Have a nice day, snowflake...

Try that once more, please. With honesty this time. Thanks.
Copy that - you have / offered NOTHING.

Your surrender is accepted.

Your claims about Biden and Burisma investigations and the firing of the prosecutor are false. You are lying. Try again. With honesty.
That's against Easy's nature.
 
Your claims about Biden and Burisma investigations and the firing of the prosecutor are false. You are lying. Try again. With honesty.
Your unsubstantiated, emotionally manipulated, liberal-media-parroting opinion means nothing. You can NOT dodge, though you are trying to, the questions asked of you that make or break this entire coup charade:

What exact personal gain did the President receive from asking the Ukraine PM to look into Democrats colluding with former criminal Ukraine officials to target US citizens (Manafort & Trump) and to interfere in a US Presidential election, ensuring they would not do so again?


D-Schiff declared the day before his coup proceedings began that he would protect the Bidens and the Democrats who collaborated with corrupt Ukrainian officials in an attempt to affect the 2016 election...yet his own 'witnesses' have testified that the only concerns over Conflicts of Interest / crimes regarding Ukraine was that of JOE BIDEN. Schiff's own 'witness' went on to say he thought the BIDENS need to be investigated.


What exact personal gain did the President receive from asking the Ukraine PM to look into a former VP's videotaped confession of extorting the PM's predecessor to protect his son who was working for a notorious Ukraine criminal?

Unlike with Barry & Joe, military aid was given to Ukraine. President Trump did not receive and cash / property / etc...Obama's failed Ukraine Ambassador prevented Ukraine from freely giving evidence of crimes committed by DEMOCRATS in 2016 to the DOJ. Democrats and Common Core snowflakes like yourself are demanding the nation believe a non-existent, un-named, unknown (if you believe Schiff), non-whistleblower who never witnessed anything over individuals who do have 1st-hand account knowledge - Morrison, Volker, President Trump, and the Ukraine PM, ALL OF WHOM SAY THE DEMOCRATS' ACCUSATIONS ARE FALSE!


How has the President physically prevented grown adults from choosing to testify, except perhaps with the same legal tools wielded by former Presidents?

NO!


Show me the EXACT law that requires a President to testify in an Inquisition in which his Constitutional Rights have been trampled, where there is no crime, no evidence of crime, no whistleblower, no witnesses...and 'witnesses' SCHIFF has called have declared the accusations against the President are FALSE.

D-Schiff can not answer this question because he KNOWS he is lying and can not successfully lie to over 400 LAWYERS - his peers - who know as well as he does that NO SUCH LAW EXISTS.


Show me the President's videotaped admission of guilt, like the one Biden gave.

YOU know there is no such videotaped confession made by President Trump while everyone has seen Biden's. You know there is no videotaped confession by the President, as Biden's, because - as Morrison & Volker made perfectly clear yesterday, THERE WAS NO PRESSURE, NO EXTORTION, NO BRIBERY, NO QUID PRO QHO, AND NO TREASON PERPETRATED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP.

Keep 'running to your Safe Space and dodging these questions, lil' snowflake!
 
That's against Easy's nature.
No one asked for a comment from the resident lying liberal ward of the Socialist Democrat Geriatric Alzheimer's-Suffering Pathological Liars Clinic...but since you butted in, YOUR TURN:

Show me the EXACT law that requires a President to testify in an Inquisition in which his Constitutional Rights have been trampled, where there is no crime, no evidence of crime, no whistleblower, no witnesses...and 'witnesses' SCHIFF has called have declared the accusations against the President are FALSE.

Show me the President's videotaped admission of guilt, like the one Biden gave.



---------------------

How old and mentally damaged do you have to be to choose to ignore the individuals who actually were involved with the phone call declaring what the Democrats / the proven liar Schiff is claiming is FALSE / a LIE and choosing to believe that a non-existent, un-named, Deep State non-whistleblower who did not witness anything, who according to Schiff worked with him and his staff before filing the complain but whose identity Schiff suddenly doesn't know? How old are you again? If you can't remember, that's to be expected....
 

Forum List

Back
Top